Friday, December 26, 2008

Dont Blame Bush if We Get Attacked When Obama Takes Over

If you want to pinpoint a flaw when Obama takes power on January 20, 2009, please take note of Biden's warning about a potential terrorist attack with in the next 6 months of an Obama presidency. We have seen a glimpse of trouble between Pakistan and India. Tensions are surmounting between these nuclear nations after the terrorist attack at a hotel in India.

Obama's policy with foreign policy matters and issues with counter-terrorism is weak. With warning threats of closing down Club Gitmo, it is just of the first of many widening problems Obama cannot ignore. So, if the USA gets attacked by terrorist, please don't go and blame on the Bush Administration. We haven't been attacked in 7 years since 9/11. Anything that occurs on Obama's watch is under the duty of that president in charge to be ultimately responsible for their blunders.

Keep in mind we are safe because of the policies set by the Bush Administration. Bush is responsible for reorganizing the entire intelligence community, taking the fight "head-on" on enemy soil, tightening terrorist communication surveillance, destroying the wall that prevented sharing of information between agencies, and creating the Department of Homeland Security. Bush increased the size of the TSA, Border Security, and increase inspectors to check shipping containers. I wrote in the past year that we have built hundreds of miles of a secured fence at our borders, double the size of our border patrol, and put billions of dollars in technology to prevent illegal aliens from crossing the borders. Its success has increased our deportation of many illegal aliens since last year and arrested more gang members, fugitives and terrorists who illegally crossed our borders. The result has been a historic reversal in illegal immigration, with no net increase in the illegal immigrant population in our country for the first time in decades.

Watch carefully how Obama runs this country. We do not live in a safe world. There are people out there who hate us and want us harmed. The success in preventing a terrorist attack has much more to do with being on the offensive. By intercepting terrorist communications overseas, taking the fight to the enemy abroad, and aggressively follow each potential lead to capture a terrorist are the gold standard that kept us safe for 7 years. Any deviation from this model will lead to a devastated effect. So, under an Obama Administration, if the USA encounters a terrorist attack, do not blame it on Bush. Rather, you can blame on Obama who diverted from the gold standard.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Hillary Clinton Problem with Bill Clinton and Blackwater

According to a list of 200,000 donors, former US president Bill Clinton has disclosed that Blackwater, a private security guard company to the US State Department in Iraq, gave $25,000 to the Clinton Library/Foundation.

Blackwater may be a thorn to soon to be Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. To refresh those who forgot, five Blackwater guards were charged with manslaughter over the shooting of 17 Iraqi civilians in September 2007.

This small contribution by Blackwater to the Clinton Library/Foundation may be insignificant, but every Liberal cheeseheads are in an uproar. Her confirmation could come under closer scrutiny over the appearance of conflict of interest over Blackwater and the foundation.

Right now, there is the strong possibility that Blackwater could lose its license to operate in Iraq. There is the possibility that Blackwater could get kicked out. That could cost Blackwater its contract to protect U.S. diplomats.

It will be up to Obama and Clinton to deal with the security situation of Iraq. The next secretary of state will make that call. Assuming Hillary Rodham Clinton is confirmed as Secretary of State, she will have the final say on whether Blackwater will keep its contract despite a deadly shooting last year.

This is something that caused Liberals to have a fit. It's because Liberals are afraid that Hillary will award Blackwaters contract to Halliburton. LOL.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

The Pope, The World Economic Crisis, and the True Meaning of Christmas

We are all human built with mortal flaws. We understand these flaws and accept them openly. But still, it annoys me when we take these human flaws for granted and blame a misfortune to something or someone else. It is like for a stubborn person not giving in to reality for a folly he/she believes to be true.

Taking stubbornness as an example of a human flaw, it takes an event to realize the obvious that the true answer is very simplistic.

Therefore, it was so nice for Pope Benedict XVI to remind us the true meaning of Christmas. Majority of us forget and take it for granted. If you ask the "man on the street" the first thought that comes in his/her head when they hear the word Christmas, many would say Santa, gifts, and Christmas tree before saying the birth of Jesus. It nothing to be embarrass about, but it reminds us that our humanity makes each one of us very unique.

I am so glad that Pope Benedict XVI pointed out another spin to the benefits of a worldwide economic recession. I pointed out in my past blog how the recession had its good points. But taking this worldwide, it has a bigger meaning that affects many of us.

This recession has made us see Christmas in a different light. As I said earlier, it takes an event to see the truth. While many would mean fewer Christmas presents, these tough times can give back the simplicity and solidarity to the true meaning of Christmas.

Pope Benedict expressed that the financial crisis has help people focus on the spiritual meaning of Christmas. And for those who don't understand the meaning of Christmas, ask any Christian worldwide as they will say it marks the birth of Jesus.

The simple message that Pope Benedict said is a perfect reflection to the authentic values that Christmas brings. Pope Benedict showed that this crisis has helped people rediscover about themselves that the birth of Jesus brings warmth, simplicity, friendship and solidarity. It shouldn't be fighting in the malls, dreading the long lines, and deciding to a complex obligation to visit relatives and family.

It's a shame that it takes a crisis for us to stand and reevaluate what is the real truth and that has always been there from the beginning. Like Jesus, we tend to forget HE is there and take HIM for granted until we need HIM. Since we are selfish and so self-absorbed in the complexities of life, just know that HE will never abandon you. All HE ask is very simple and doesn't take any effort and that is to remember what is the true meaning of Christmas and Easter.

Pope Benedict have stressed this in his sermons, but it seems it goes in one ear and out the other. Since the Holy Father has a deep understanding of Christianity, it would be logical that we aren't ready to accept its meaning. Ironically, it took a crisis for his message to be understood

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

We Need More Gay School and Gay Studies

Hey, I didn’t say it. I don’t support this ridiculous ideology, but the person that president-elect Obama nominated to be Education Secretary did. Yes, believe it or not, Arne Duncan, who was selected to join the cabinet as Secretary of Education and was a former executive officer of Chicago Public Schools, adamantly has supported specially designated high schools for gay, lesbian and transgendered teens.

At an October 2008 event at a Chicago location that Duncan designated for a gay school to be built, he said, "If you look at national studies, you see gay and lesbian students with high dropout rates...Studies show they are disproportionately homeless. I think there is a niche there we need to fill."

It is a scary thought that Duncan already has a curriculum in mind to be utilized as the model for a national program for educating gay teens. Did you know there is a school in Chicago that caters to gay youth? It is called the School for Social Justice Pride Campus and this is the school the Duncan will establish precedent for all future gay schools. The school open in 2010 with 600 students enrolled.

I do have a problem with this. In this current state of economy, this is a complete waste of our tax payer’s money to spend on something that is totally unnecessarily. I don’t think it is the role of the government to set a standard “gay” curriculum of courses that we should teach our children. Learning how to be gay, give oral sex, and receive anal sex is not a prerequisite to go college. This is something we should not encourage. I think it is the role of the parent to teach their children about sex education and not the government. Beside, it is immoral to encourage this type of lifestyle in this backward society. Supporters for gay education are a small percent of the population. Why does a minority rule the majority class? This is why I support home school education. If these families want gay schools, they should teach their children how to be gay then.

Just step back and look how ludicrous this form of education. Does this look normal? Please be honest! If this goes through, I would be completely ashamed of this country and what we have become. I want someone to tell me, with a straight face, how a gay school would over all improve the current state of our education.

Monday, December 15, 2008

I Hate John McCain Because He is an Idiot

Transcript from ABC’s “This Week” with host George Stephanopoulos and guest John McCain.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me switch to the politics of the Republican Party. You said, after the election, that Governor Palin has a bright future in your party. Does that mean that, if she does choose to run for president, she can count on your support?

MCCAIN: Oh, no. Listen, I have the greatest appreciation for Governor Palin and her family, and it was a great joy to know them. She invigorated our campaign. She was just down in Georgia and invigorated their campaign. But I can't say something like that. We've got some great other young governors. I think you're going to see the governors assume a greater leadership role in our Republican Party. Pawlenty, Huntsman...

STEPHANOPOULOS: But why not? (inaudible) she was the best person...

MCCAIN: Sure. Yes.

STEPHANOPOULOS: ... to succeed you if something had happened to you?

MCCAIN: But now we're in a whole election cycle. Have no doubt of my admiration and respect for her and my view of her viability, but at this stage, again...my corpse is still warm, you know?


The audacity of McCain being sexist is unfounded. This dumbass Senator from Arizona chose to support Sarah Palin to be his running mate, but will not support her if she ran for the presidency in 2012. Just read the transcript. It is quite obvious that RINOs try to retain their existence in Congress by piggy backing themselves with the Conservative base. This could lead conspiracy theorist to believe that RINOs were embedded into the Conservative Party by Democrats who want Conservatives to lose elections.

It was a mistake to support McCain because he ran a pitiful campaign, late in attacking his opponent, and weak in explaining his message. Screw with crossing party lines. Appeasing and going against the fundamental value of the Conservative base is just being a hypocrite. Just seeing RINOs favoring a moderate “middle-of-the-road” philosophy and pretending to be conservative only confuses the voters to lean Democrat. Look at the past two elections we had to see my point. This middle of the road “bullshit” only makes our Conservative cause difficult to maintain.

I blame McCain and his inept campaign people for losing this past election. Not only had this geezer fooled the American people that he could beat Obama, he made the entire Conservative movement look like idiots with his stupid middle-of-the-road message. By having McCain imply that Palin is not a good choice to run for the presidency, only solidifies my support for her even more. She speaks without stuttering. She is full of vigor, in tip-top shape, and charismatic like Reagan. She has demonstrates that deeds and actions speak louder than words. Not being spoiled by the cesspool of Washington politics and being an outsider, Palin shows that she cares about the country and not her own selfish interest. Besides, Palin is not afraid to express her passion against her opponent. That is why she called a “Pit Bull with Lipstick.”

The only way to bring Conservatives back into the mainstream is to get rid of McCain and his fellow RINOs out of Congress. These RINOs are a bunch of sorry asses!

(RINO = Republican In Name Only)

This Recession Does Have Its Positives

Okay, we are in a recession. Yes, there are severe implications that are associated being in one. Unfortunately, it does happen and when the business cycle improves, we come out of it better than before. Since people tend to look at the negative, they should be looking at the positives or be a little more optimistic. In the past months, have you noticed yourself drinking less and exercising more? Do you find yourself paying down your credit card debt? If you smoke, have you cut back? Have you been spending more time with your kids, and spending more time with your aging parents or grandparents? Have you lost weight? Does the air seem cleaner, the roads less crowded? Well, you are not dreaming. This is the atmosphere in being in a recession. I heard from some economist on FoxNews trying to rationalize that a slowing economy can actually help you live longer. He said it is just one of a few payoffs that might surprise many Americans who see this recession as an unrepaired disaster.

Whether or not you see the recession giving a positive response in a person life, there are direct improvements that we haven't seen for the past several years. I have mentioned in the past that this recession has been a life saver in terms with the price of gas. For the past several years, we have seen an artificial bombardment on the barrel of oil and the prices at the gas pumps, but now it has drastically toned down from its hype. From $147 per barrel of oil and $4.00 per gallon of gas, I am excited to see that this recession because the price of oil to drop to $48 per barrel and the price of gas $1.60 per gallon. I don't know about you, but I rely on my car a lot for my job. To see this pleasant sight at the gas pump is much to my liking. But still, I am not sitting on my laurels. We need to be dependent from foreign oil because this honeymoon may be short lived. If it took 4 months to see the price of oil and gas come down more to a comfortable level, I can imagine it can reverse course, just the same.

Beside the price of oil, did you know that many illegal aliens are leaving in droves back across the Mexican border? Based on a report by the Mexico's interior ministry, there are more than 1 million people returning back to Mexico in the past year. Do you know why? This recession caused job layoffs, no job opportunities, anti-immigrant sentiment and the crackdown on illegal immigrants. The best part is that these illegal aliens have no intention of returning back. How do I know that? That is because the Mexican consulate said there is a 25% increase of import tax exemptions applications by these illegal aliens to bring home their belongings. Hopefully, before they change their minds, we will have the borders secured once and for all.

Another positive not to point out is that US dollars aren't being sent across the border to support the Mexican economy. Last year, the illegal aliens sent $2 billion across to Mexico to their families. Ironically, this is a significant drop to what they have been sending in past years since 1996 when the Mexico's Central Bank began tracking.

Wow, imagine if we stop the flow of US dollar heading to Mexico by curbing illegal alien’s entrance into the United States ($2 billion) and end foreign oil dependence ($750 billion), the messiah should have enough money at his disposal to socialize this country with his nationalized agenda. But honestly, just stopping the influx of illegal aliens and drastically curb our oil dependence can help the working tax payer in a big way.

Blagojevich Should Tell Obama to Stick It Where the Sun Don't Shine

This Blagojevich scandal is reaching new heights. Now, the Democrats from all sides of the political spectrum either wants to impeach him or oust him from office due to mental deficiency. The fear the Blagojevich can nominate himself to the seat of the US Senate is scaring the living daylights to the Democratic base. I just don’t see the big deal. Blagojevich is getting the “royal shaft.” Why not let Blagojevich get even with the Democrats for throwing the Illinois Governor under the bus. I really like how Rush Limbaugh said it best.

Rush said, “I've been thinking about this. I think if Blago, if they don't pay him what he wants to resign, I have the perfect revenge who he should nominate, because the Senate cannot stop who he nominates. Alan Keyes. If Blagojevich really wants to stick it to Obama and these guys, nominate Alan Keyes. It doesn't matter that he doesn't live in Illinois. Hillary didn't live in New York, either.”

Let’s keep Blagojevich do what he does best. This is to exemplify the true meaning to be a Democrat in Capitol Hill.

Obamas Blagogate Will Lead to Eventual Impreachment

The latest scandal involving Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich or Blagogate will be a thorn in Barack Obama side. This will be equivalent to what Nixon had to Watergate. The pay to play Chicago politics will end the future presidency of Obama. Like the majority of politicians stemming from Illinois, whether Democrat or Republican, each one, including the messiah, are corrupted.

This scandal will not go away anytime soon. There are allegations of various Obama associates linked to this Blagojevich scandal. The very fabric of this nation could be torn apart as Obama made his 48 hr delayed plea that he had no direct discussions with Blagojevich over who would succeed him in the Senate. Well, Obama may not had direct talk to the governor, but his soon-to-be chief of staff did.

While Emanuel denies that any kind of deal was struck over Obama's preferred successor, it's obvious from taped conversations that he failed to report the offers to sell Obama's seat to the highest bidder to authorities. Even if Emanuel turned Blagojevich down flat, promising him nothing will only piss the governor off. Now, being caught "red-handed" by the Feds, Blagojevich has the opportunity to do the right thing and save his ass. He will do the Chicago way and squeal like a pig. I am curious of the names he will bring to public and I will be so delighted when he mentions the messiah's name.

If Obama fired US Attorney Pat Fitzgerald when the messiah takes power on Jan 20, 2008, you can bet your life that Republicans won't let the story die. Even the media knows this is too good of a story to pass up. The word "impeachment" would drive any journalist into a frenzy.

Unlike Reverend Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Father Pfleger and the case of Obama's birth records, Blagogate is here to stay until Obama gets impeached or destroys his political career.

While pundits for Obama pleads that the messiah should throw those involved in Blagogate under the bus, I say, "leave them there." It makes a good soap opera just like the OJ Simpson saga. As a matter of fact, Obama himself should end this presidential charade before it begins. The appearance of impropriety itself is enough to warrant an end to this lunacy that has been the Obama coronation.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Rahmbo is a Ballerina

Rahmbo is a Ballerina


It seems the scandals committed by Democrats are growing at an exponential rate. The latest juicy headline is Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel and his involvement with Blago-gate. While Democrats enjoy tormenting Republicans, and at times crucify them of their misdeeds, it is obvious that Democrats are unable to tolerate the heat.


As reported by ABC News:


[The president-elect’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, said today he won’t go to the Chicago presidential transition offices in order to avoid reporters trying to ask him whether he had contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama’s election.

Emanuel appeared “beet-red,” according to an ABC News cameraman who was invited inside by Emanuel to use his bathroom this morning.

“I’m getting regular death threats. You’ve put my home address on national television. I’m pissed at the networks. You’ve intruded too much,” Emanuel said, according to the cameraman.

A spokesman for Emanuel said he later showed up at the office, apparently able to sneak out of the house without being seen by reporters waiting to ask him questions.]



My first question immediately would be why did Rahmbo invite a cameraman to use his bathroom? Can you say, “Senator Craig?” LOL. But honestly, trying to ignore the press will only make matters worst. I thought this is the guy who used a steak knife and stabbed it into a table as he rattle off enemies (many Republicans included) that he wanted “DEAD.”

Come on, Rahmbo! I thought you are from the tough streets of Chicago. Oops! I forgot you were also a ballerina in the past.

Media Having A Field Day with Democrat Scandals

It seems apparent that all the attention is toward Obama and his Cabinet. The media hand picked Obama because he is headline news. From Obama’s questionable US citizenship to his association with radical friends, there is enough material to make 2009 the year the media makes a comeback. It doesn’t matter whether it is a Republican or Democrat. What matters is which party can give the best juicy story. That is why the mainstream media put Obama in office because the media knows Obama will not disappointing them. The same goes for the Democratic Party. This year alone the media went on a blitzkrieg with scandals highlighting the evening news. Since the media is dying out to extinction, their only solution for solvency is keeping the Democrats in power.

Here is the short list of stories the media is working on.


-Charles Rangel (D-NY) accused of failing to report $75,000 income from the rental of his villa in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (September 2008).

-William J. Jefferson (D-LA) in August 2005 the FBI seized $90,000 in cash from Jefferson's home freezer. He was re-elected in 2006. On June 4, 2007, Jefferson was indicted on 16 charges of corruption for accepting bribes from convicted businessman Vernan Jackson. Jefferson pled not guilty. His former Chief of Staff Brett Pfeffer has been sentenced to 84 months. On December 6, 2008, Jefferson lost his bid for reelection.

-Alabama Birmingham Mayor Larry Langford (D-AL) was arrested on December 1, 2008 by the FBI on a 101 count indictment alleging conspiracy, bribery, fraud, money laundering, and filing false tax returns in connection with a long-running bribery scheme.

-Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich (D-IL) was arrested by the FBI and charged with conspiracy to commit mail, wire fraud and solicitation of bribery. He was also accused of participating in several "Pay to Play" schemes, including attempting to sell President-elect Barack Obama's vacated U.S. Senate seat to the highest bidder (December 9, 2008).

-Michigan Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick (D-MI) with Chief-of-Staff Christine Beatty, fired two police officers for investigating claims that Kilpatrick had used his security unit to cover up their extramarital affairs and lied about it. He also used city funds for travel, and wild parties with his security team and strippers at his mansion. He was sentenced to 4 months in prison with 5 years probation. (2008)
-Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann (D-OH) resigns from the post of Attorney General because of a sex scandal and harassment with aides. He resigned on May 14, 2008. Ohio's three important newspapers had called for his resignation.

-Eliot Spitzer (D-NY) New York Governor - went through a prostitution service called Emperors Club VIP where he allegedly met with a prostitute in a Washington, D.C. hotel. He was linked to the prostitution ring by a wiretap of his cell phone. No charges were filed. (2008)

-John Edwards Senator (D-NC) Former 2008 Democratic Presidential candidate - admitted to an extramarital affair with Rielle Hunter while his wife was battling cancer, but denies that he fathered Hunter's child (August 8, 2008)

-Tim Mahoney (D-FL) Mahoney admitted in October 2008 of having an affair with congressional aide and later campaign staffer Patricia Allen. When Allen threatened to sue for sexual harassment Mahoney paid her $122,000. Mahoney is also under FBI investigation for preferential treatment he may have given to Martin County in the amount of $3.4 million in hurricane funds. Mahoney was seeking re-election, but lost the race.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Caylee Anthony's Mother Deserves the Death Penalty

The skeletal remains of a small child found in the woods has to be Caylee Anthony. This is the most heinous act against humanity. There is no remorse from the mother who done this. There is no excuse that mother doesn't end up with the death penalty. She deserves a botched up and painful execution.

Casey Anthony, the murderous mom, killed her 3 year old because the child was an inconvenience to her mother's active nightlife. I'm jumping the gun, but in this society where we judge before we hear the facts, all the evidences are pointing guilty. When there is a child's body in a garbage bag behind the woods of the child's grandparents house and there isn't any report of a missing child in the local area and a child's mother who is oblivious of the whereabouts her child, what do you think?

I am so outrage when I watch the timeline of Caylee Anthony disappearance on the news and Caylee's mother lying and acting as the victim of this despicable act of a premeditated murder. I really want to throw something at the television screen. It makes me sick.

The silver lining is that there will be closure to this story. I pray that Casey Anthony get the death penalty and I pray that I get the call to be a juror. This is no other way to dismiss what happened. The only way that justice won't be served would be the manipulation of the defense lawyer.

This will not be another OJ Simpson trail of the century. This will be a cut and clear closed case. Justice will be served and Casey Anthony will be condemned by her peers and by God our Father. I would be scared of the latter than the former.

This immoral society is of our own doing. If this idiotic mother felt what she did was moral and just, imagine how we trust our lives to those we don't know. See what I mean? We are seeing the decay of our society. The Liberal mind is selfish to its own needs. Trust has become a novelty. This ugly act of murder is beyond comprehension and I hope it makes us wanting to change our ways.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

If Iran Nukes Israel We Will Nuke Iran

For those who voted against Obama in the Nov. 4, 2008 election, you should be plenty scared that you didn't do enough to stop a man who has no experience to be president. For those who voted for Obama, you are idiots and I will tell you why?

The messiah stated boldly that it will offer Israel a "nuclear umbrella" against the threat of a nuclear attack by Iran. To simplify this to the naive layman, Obama said that if there is an attack on Israel by Tehran, it would result in a devastating U.S. nuclear response against Iran. Are you scared yet? Well, you should be!

This announcement by the Obama camp tells us some valuable information. This ultimatum only suggests there are signs that U.S. believes Iran will eventually acquire nuclear weapons. What other way could you had interpreted this?

This is how misguided and dangerous the Democrat party can be. They have never been strong on national security and foreign policy. Even soon-to-be Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had suggested the idea of a nuclear guarantee to Israel during her campaign for the Democratic Party's nomination for the presidency. That is why such responsibilities concerning the safety of this country should remain to the Republican Party. This just show how Obama is so inexperience with foreign policy matters. Obama deals his foreign policy just like playing poker. He, who could successfully bluffs first, wins the hand.

So, our national security and foreign affairs under Obama will be based on using the "nuclear option." That's real great (sarcasm). Now, the likelihood of a nuclear war is within our reach. Imagine this scenario. Iran nukes Israel. We nuke Iran. What do you think will happen next? We have toxic nuclear debris floating around the Middle East. Depending on the wind direction, this debris will be affecting neighboring countries. This will set precedence for future attacks using nuclear technology.

Let me tell you the "experience" of the new Secretary of State. With her infinite worldly wisdom, Hillary also proposed that the American nuclear umbrella should be extended to other countries in the region, like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. Of course, Hillary asked for one condition. That is if they agree to relinquish their own nuclear ambitions. That means the USA will police the world using the nuclear option. Does that mean we will increase our nuclear capability to protect our allies?

Returning back to the messiah, Obama said this week that he would "negotiate" with Iran to relinquish its nuclear program. If Iran refuses, Obama would act unilaterally to impose intense sanctions against Iran (Wow, that’s an original). The problem with this is that we have severe sanctions on Iran right now. What other sanctions can we impose on them? I guess Obama is blowing steam with empty threats. What a stupid rookie?

This proposal for a nuclear umbrella for Israel is absolutely ridiculous. It lacks credibility. You actually think the American people will go for this. I think the American people would support keeping Club Gitmo open indefinitely than tinkering on the idea of using nuclear weapons. Democrats believe using the nuclear option as a deterrent and as the first option. What do you think? What is the point of an American response if Israel is wiped off the map by a nuclear blast? We would be countering a nuclear response with another nuclear retaliation. I would think this type of aggression would only alienate us from the world. I would think it will start a nuclear war. Isn't Obama going to deliver a speech to apologies to the Muslim world for our intolerance and arrogance? It kind of contradicts his initial intentions- "I apologies for our aggression and being a bully, but if you piss us off we will nuke your ass."

Obama should learn that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Why procrastinate before the problem gets worst? Haven’t the Democrats learned from their mistakes with Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, the auto bailout, and the mortgage crisis yet? In fact, Obama is way over his head with his overall idiotic intentions.

But hey! You voted for him because that’s the change you can count on.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Obama is a Muslim and Will Apologies to the World

Barack Obama plans to apologies to the Islamic World as soon after taking office. Why? I have no freaking idea! Let me get this straight. Obama is seeking to appease the Muslim world that America is not the barbarians that hates Muslims. I would say that it would be the other way around. Base on the Quran, Islam is the truth, while all religions are not. My problem to this propaganda, Obama is trying to distract the real issue at hand and that his administration is starting to fall apart. Since when we have to apologies to the Muslim world, when, in fact, they hate us the most. In this country, Muslims and Christians are able to coincide humanely. There is a religious tolerance here in America that each religious sect respects. Therefore, going to the rest of the world to apologies something we aren’t doing (killing each other for our religious belief) is unfounded and stupid.

If the Muslim world doesn’t understand us, they should screw themselves. If they don't like how we can live in harmony with many religions in one country, they should come to America and realize their dream of prosperity and freedom. To whine and be angry for something we don't have any control of should not be a mandate to kill us. This apologetic trip may just reassure to the Muslim world that we actually hate them.

So, my question is what happens afterwards? Are we going to be hold hands and sing kumbaya?

Obama says, "I think we've got a unique opportunity to reboot America's image around the world and also in the Muslim world in particular." The messiah also says, "I promise an unrelenting desire to create a relationship of mutual respect and partnership in countries and with peoples of good will who want their citizens and ours to prosper together. The world is ready for that message." So, Obama didn’t realize that the people of France, England, Germany, and Italy voted for leaders who are pro-American. I guess Obama is blindsided in his fantasy world full of drugs. He thinks the world hates America. They may be envied of us, but that doesn’t mean they should hate us.

So, am I assuming Obama thinks we are the bad guys and the terrorist attack in India was our fault? Since Americans were there vacationing in India, these Islamic wackos gives them the right to target us. You think Obama's "save the world” speech will make a difference. I would think it will embolden the enemy by making us scared to their demands. The world knows that we don't have the guts to finish the job. Even Osama Bin Laden said that al Qaeda can't win militarily, but they can destroy the will of the American people with a couple of IEDs.

This is the first national security blunder Obama has committed. Appeasement does not work. This speech will weaken our stance against terrorism. It gives the go ahead to those terrorist around the world that USA will just turn a blind eye, just like the Clinton Administration. Like the attack in India that caused 6 American deaths, Obama just give condolences with no solutions how to bring justice. Even though Bush is being proactive, Obama could encourage President Bush to do something, but didn't. This window of opportunity to show the nation that Obama as a leader is lost. This shows the lack of insight of the president-elect.

Get this! To show his Muslim heritage, Obama will be sworn on January 20, 2009, by his full name, Barack Hussein Obama. Throughout the campaign season, nobody was allowed to use his middle name. Now, it is apparent that he is proud of his Muslim heritage. To those people who thought Obama was a Muslim, YOU ARE RIGHT! If Obama decided to be sworn on the Quran, I will guarantee that there will be hell to pay!

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Obama Wont Be Able to Toss Blagojevich Under the Buss

Oh, it is so convenient and predictable for Obama to say he had not talked, that he was aware of, with Governor Blagojevich (D-Ill). The Governor of Illinois was caught trying to sell Obama's relinquished Senate seat, among other things.

I knew Obama would try to fend the critics, but I found that back in November 28, 2008, Obama did have that conversation with Blagojevich.

On December 9, 2008,
When asked what contact Obama had with the governor about his replacement in the Senate, Obama said, "I had no contact with the governor or his office and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening."

Rewind back to November 23, 2008, Obama's senior adviser David Axelrod said on Fox News Chicago that Obama told Blagojevich he had not expressed a favorite to replace him. Axelrod said, "I know he's talked to the governor and there are a whole range of names many of which have surfaced, and I think he has a fondness for a lot of them."

Another typical lie that I would expect from Obama. But unlike the favoritism by the MSM, this story is not going to die. Every media outlet will dig its teeth till the truth comes out. This type of news is the "kiss of death" for those who ignores it. With the MSM dying every living moment, this story will sell papers.

Even though there is no allegations that Obama had anything to do with Gov. Blagojevich scandal yet, there are serious questions arise about the relationship between Obama and Blagojevich. It is a fact that Obama endorsed Blagojevich gubernatorial bid in 2002 and 2006 and served as a top adviser to the Illinois governor in Obamas first 2002 run for the state house.

In fact, there are indications that Mr. Obama was going to offer a simple "thank you" if Blagojevich appointed Obama's friend Valerie Jarrett to take his U.S. Senate seat.

But there are questions about how Blagojevich knew that Mr. Obama was not willing to give him anything in exchange for the Senate seat. Who did Blagojevich spoke to in those FBI tapes? Did that disgruntled person report the governor to the authorities?

It is early to know what's going to happen, but don't be fooled between their relationship. Like Wright, Resko, and Ayers, there is a long history of support and political alliances built between Obama and Blagojevich. This is very significant that will hurt Obama's political capital. If this transpires that Obama was involved in the scandal, 2009 will be a exceptional year for a nice impeachment proceeding. I just hope this all occurs by Christmas. It would be a perfect Christmas gift.

Obama Implicated to Gov Blagojevich Scandal?

It seems that Illinois politician have a history of corruption as seen today when the FBI arrested Illinois Governor Blagojevich for a list of corrupted dealings. It seems that Obama has a link to this mess, which may implicate the president-elect into this messy scandal.

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich wanted President-elect Barack Obama to give Blagojevich a special favor in exchange for going along with Obama's choice to fill his vacant US Senate seat. This information is damning evidence against Obama according to an FBI affidavit.

The FBI says Blagojevich wanted to be a high paying job as Secretary of Health and Human Services and giving Blagojevich's wife a paid board of director position of a corporation as the price for naming Obama's successor.

Because Blagojevich is hungry for money, he is willing to do anything to get that power he desires. Therefore, he didn't care abusing his seat as governor to get it.

Unknown if Obama spoke to Blagojevich directly or through an aide, the FBI affidavit said Blagojevich had been told that "the President-elect can get ROD BLAGOJEVICH's wife on paid corporate boards in exchange for naming the President-elect's pick to the Senate."

Obama or his aide representing the president-elect said that Obama can arrange something for Blagojevich wife, but unable to give the governor the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

The FBI says it heard Blagojevich complain he has to give this "motherf***er [the President-elect] his Senator. F*** him. For nothing? F*** him. . . I will pick another candidate before I just give f***ing [Senate Candidate l] a f***ing Senate seat and I don't get anything."

Out of frustration, Governor Blagojevich apparently considered appointing himself to Obama's Senate seat, but the Feds interceded and ended this pathetic drama.

It is apparent that Obama had a role in this. Just like his radical association with Wright, Resko, and Ayers, I wonder if Obama is going to throw Blagojevich under the bus. This is getting better each day. This will definitely hamper any presidential re-election ambition for Obama because this is too good to ignore. In fact, forget the birth certificate lawsuit, we can impeach Obama using Blagojevich as the patsy. LOL.

Obama Says The Economy Will Get Worst

I am not sure if Obama has a clue what to do as president. His facial tic is getting annoying and the stress is taking its toll on him. And Obama is not seated behind the president's desk yet. I guess it takes to be the president to understand any idiotic statement prior to the elections is ignorant and unfounded. Now, Obama realizes that this is not a joke and he is responsible for every single person living in America. So, I hope Obama stops his flip-flopping habits and sits down and understand that the seat of the presidency does not lend to on the job training. Therefore, Obama has a little over a month to get up to speed. His recent remark about the economy is embarrassing. You don't tell the American people that the economy is going to get worst. That's not going to help consumer confidence. It's not going to encourage spending and investing. The leader of the free world should give us hope, which I though was part of his campaign motto. I guess it was just a clever bumper sticker slogan.

Flip - October 7, 2008:
Brokaw: Sen. Obama, time for a discussion. I’m going to begin with you. Are you saying to Mr. Clark and to the other members of the American television audience that the American economy is going to get much worse before it gets better and they ought to be prepared for that?

Obama: No, I am confident about the American economy.

Flop - December 6, 2008:
MR. BROKAW: On this program about a year ago, you said that being a president is 90 percent circumstances and about 10 percent agenda. The circumstances now are, as you say, very unpopular in terms of the decisions that have to be made. Which are the most unpopular ones that the country’s going to have to deal with?

PRES.-ELECT OBAMA: Well, fortunately, as tough as times are right now–and things are going to get worse before they get better–there is a convergence between circumstances and agend

Monday, December 8, 2008

Obama is Running George W. Bush Third Term

I had several Liberals comment on my blogs stating I was nuts saying that Obama ran as a moderate or centrist. It is true Obama ran as a left wing Liberal against Hillary and won because the liberal ideology is the platform of the Democrat party. But when it came to the general election, Obama had to run to the middle to attract those naive souls to vote for him. Majority of American, at least 58 million of them, are not Liberal, and in order for Obama to tap that group, he had to tone down his views or ignore it altogether.

What we are seeing now is the descent of the Liberals. They are growing increasingly angry because they are feeling betrayed. Hey, Obama is trying to get re-elected in 2012 and he is trying to throw a temporary smokescreen to pander those voters who voted for him.

Obama's Cabinet positions and policy choices are not in line to his promises from his presidential campaign. For instance, Obama has reversed pledges to immediately repeal tax cuts for the wealthy (he will allow it to expire). He rescinded his windfall profits tax on Big Oil (with oil $45 a barrel, I don't think so). Obama flip-flopped again on his call for a quick drawdown in Iraq (he wants it to succeed before going to Afghanistan).

Doesn't it seem that Obama is running a George W. Bush third term? Even though I love George W, Obama is going to expand the role of government on social issues on grander scale, keep a strong foreign policy, and continue the war against terrorism. It is probably why Obama kept Gates as Secretary of Defense, a Bush appointment, to keep this country safe. Still, I resent Obama's ideology of raising any taxes during weak economic times. We know he will taxes. How would Obama pay for his massive spending spree in a slowing economy without raising taxes? Even though Obama already conceded that cutting taxes will stimulate tax revenues, he is stubborn enough not to listen to his own reasoning. This shows immaturity and his inexperience.

It rather comical that Obama wants to surround himself with a centrist to right cabinet. What is comical is that these new cabinet members have extra baggage and may be a detriment to the position they will hold. I'm curious to see when Obama will get an actual Democratic administration.

I never viewed Liberal blogs, but I was curious how they viewed Obama and it surprised me they are pissed off. These bloggers are on a warpath and going to critique Obamas every move. That's kind of weird. They voted him in and now they are unsure that they chose the right person for the job.

Of course, Obama won't let them down completely. Obama will throw them a bone now and then to keep these left wing morons in check.

So, to summarize, Obama lied that he vowed to tax windfall profits on the Big Oil companies. At $45 a barrel, I don't think there would be any excessive profits to tax. Obama lied about immediately repeal the Bush tax cuts, but sad he would let them expire instead. Obama lied that he will end the war in Iraq by filling his national security positions who supported of the Iraq war (Hillary and Gates). Obama lied that he would not allow warrantless wiretapping on U.S. soil to continue, but instead he voted to support it. Obama lied he would put an economic team who supported the liberal agenda, but instead put in pro-labor supporters on the team.

But I'm not going to jump up and down supporting that Obama will run to the center. There are certain pledges by powerful lobbyist that lines Obama's pocket. I cannot see Obama reneging out his promise for pro-union card check, legalizing all forms of abortion, and putting justices on the Supreme Court that will legislate from the bench.

Obama is still the most liberal senator in the US Congress and will govern with that mentality.

For those Obama supporters, he is asking for patience. Obamas only excuse for his unorthodox manner is that he is only shifting his stance on some issues because circumstances are shifting. Well, like "DUH."

Whether you support Obama or not, he wasn’t quite the change we envisioned.

Highway and Infrastructure Spending Does Not Work to Add Jobs

I cannot understand why Democrats always believe that dumping money immediately into roads, bridges, and other infrastructures are a cure-all to stimulate a depressed economy. During President Eisenhower Administration, his road and infrastructure bill cost $119 billion. FDR's New Deal for road and infrastructure cost $140 billion. Now, the messiah want to dump close to $700 billion to created jobs to rebuild our roads and bridges. Liberal pundits point out that it's important to prevent another bridge collapse like we saw in Minnesota.

Why all of a sudden that every roads and bridges are in desperate repair? The collapse in Minnesota was the states fault that they diverted monetary resources to be used for another state run program. I see construction on a daily bases on our road and bridges. Even though the reconstruction process is very slow, pouring money into this will not do anything besides pissing many drivers off.

This highway spending is a joke and a myth. This so-called 48,000 new jobs creation is just a smokescreen.

Nowhere is the government spending stimulus myth more widespread than in highway spending. Congress and the messiah are already salivating to push billions in highway spending once Obama takes power. For the past several decades, Liberals in Capitol Hill have repeatedly supported their idiotic claim that highway spending is an immediate economic cure. A proposed study, which Liberals and Obama are basing as fact, came from the Department of Transportation stating that every $1 billion spent on highways adds 48,000 new jobs to the economy. This is the figure Obama has been pushing to get enacted.

But like all others, Obama does not give the full story and twist the contents for his expediency. There is one problem that Obama left out. The DOT study made no such claim. It states that SPENDING $1 billion on highways would REQUIRE 48,000 workers. But before the government can spend $1 billion hiring road builders and materials, it must borrow $1 billion from other sectors of the economy, which would then lose a similar number of jobs. In other words, Obama's highway spending is shifting jobs and income from one part of the economy to another. The only way $1 billion of new highway spending can create 48,000 new jobs is if the $1 billion appears out of nowhere. Therefore, this highway spending will give a total negative net effect or wouldn't do anything in improving the unemployment figures.

If you look at the April 2008 DOT update, its reduced the employment figure to 35,000 jobs supported by each $1 billion spent on highways, and stated that the figures refer to jobs supported by highway investments, not jobs created.

Haven't we learned our lesson yet? It is a fact that highway spending has a poor track record of stimulating the economy. When Reagan inherited Carters double digit unemployment, he poured billions of dollars in highway spending. I found an audit by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) stating that highway spending generally failed to create a significant number of new jobs.

To be more accurate, Obama should have said that once the resulting improvements in the nation's infrastructure is completed, only then we may see an increase future job productivity and growth. This is not the same as suggesting that the act of spending money on additional highway workers and materials is itself an immediate stimulant. This can only work if politicians will allocate money to necessary highway projects rather than wasteful pork.

This immature mindset is beyond insulting our intelligence. I just wish Obama and the politicians in Capitol Hill just come out clean and tell us the truth. Using class warfare as their weapon is a weak argument to get a point across. Only the feeble mind will be dupe by empty promises. That is why educating ourselves about the truth will ultimately lead to personal freedom.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

The Government is NOT the Solution but the Problem

It has been said,

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a
permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until
the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts
from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for
the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with
the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal
policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."

It was also said,

"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of
history, has been about 200 years.
During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the
following sequence:
1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage "

I just want to point out to those 64% Obama supporters, who failed in a simple survey testing their knowledge about their candidate, that they stupid. The quote above is the typical ideology of those naïve American who believe the government is the solution to their problem. In fact, the government is not the solution, but the source of our problems. But hey, if you need proof, just wait and see after Jan 20. to understand my point.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Chambliss and Palin vs Martin and Ludicris

I watch this morning on Fox News’ “Fox and Friends” congratulating the newly re-elected Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.

I just want to reiterate that the GOP still has star power. It is laughable to see Ludacris come down to support Chambliss' opponent Jim Martin. What the hell does Ludicris know about politics? I heard his rap song and nothing alludes to a political theme. It just demonstrates that the Democrats wanted to bring the black voters out and thought Ludicris could shore up the base. But alas, it was the most painful and embarrassing sight to see Martin and Ludicris hugging each other at the podium. It was kind of pitiful and probably why they lost.

It is a sign of good news when you have John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and Sarah Palin having the clout to diminish the star power of Obama, Bill Clinton, Gore, and Ludacris. I hope some of Chambliss past mistakes will soon change by understanding that the will of the people wants to come back to the Ronald Reagan's principle. That is Republicans standing for smaller government, fiscal responsibility, more individual rights and freedoms, and lower taxes. We’ve got to get back to those fundamentals.

I really like how Chambliss spoke highly about Palin role during this runoff election. Chambliss said, “You want to peak on the last day, and we had. But Sarah Palin came in on the last day and man, she was dynamite. We packed the houses everywhere we went. I cannot see it diminishing. I can’t overstate the impact she had down here. All these folks did a great job, they all allowed us to add momentum, but when she walks in a room, folks just explode. She’s a dynamic lady, a great administrator, and I think she’s got a great future in the Republican Party.”

I know there are a lot of people out there fearing that a Republican female candidate eyeing her ambitions to be President of the United States, but please get off that sexist bandwagon. Sarah Palin is here to stay. It seems that everybody is looking at Jindal to be the forefront GOP contender. To them, he may be the GOP’s darling, but Jindal needs to prove himself as governor. In contrast to Sarah Palin, she has been there and done that.

Whatever the case, this Senate win in Georgia may be a start of better things to come for Republicans.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Chambliss Win Runoff Election in Georgia

Today, Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss won the runoff Senatorial election in Georgia. By a overwhelming margin, a conservative beat out a liberal and prevented a super Democrat majority in the Senate. It's good news. Now we have to wait to see what happens to the recount in Minnesota.

But most important, we need to see who supported each candidate during the Georgia Senatorial runoff. I am talking about the roles played by President-elect Obama and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

While Obama chose not to campaign for the Democratic challenger, he cut a one-minute radio ad for Martin, and more than 100 Obama field organizers assisted with get-out-the-vote efforts. Martin, meanwhile, has done everything possible to connect himself to the president-elect. That is very important to note. It just shows that the people of Georgia spoke up to denounce Obama and those he supports. Martins loss can be seen that Obama does not have the clout to get the super Democrat majority he desperately needs to get this agenda pass. This opening will allow the GOP to filibuster many idiotic bills that the Democrats will try to sneak to the floor of the Senate.

Palin, the unsuccessful GOP vice presidential nominee, made her pitch and supported Chambliss Senatorial campaign. The enthusiasm is enormous and the votes show it. By making a handful of well-attended appearances with Chambliss on the eve of the runoff, she reminded other aspiring Republican politicians of her ability to excite the base.

Palin also managed to score a lot political points that could prove helpful in 2012. This proves, once again, that her status as a political superstar will be critical in her ambition for the Presidency of the United States. I can't wait and watch Palin take on Obama in 2012.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Condi Rice Plays Piano for the Queen of England

I bet no many of you know Secretary of State Condi Rice is an accomplished pianist who started playing when she was a child.

Did you know that Condoleezza Rice took time out of her busy schedule today to play a private performance at Buckingham Palace for Queen Elizabeth II? It's really cool to know that the talents of Condi Rice extends past her diplomatic expertise.

Condi's performance of Brahms was accompanied by three members of the London Symphony Orchestra. This was indeed a first in American history that a high cabinet member of an Administration to perform for a distinguish dignitary like the Queen of England or the Pope.

A palace spokeswoman stated that Condi Rice's recital was received with the highest praised by the Queen. Now, I wonder what other talent Hillary Clinton possess beside being a pain in the ass and a bore. My guess, I would think she would be a great trumpet player or a tuba player because she has a lot of hot air.

Obama's Annoying Facial Tic

Obama facial tic

What happens when you commit a lie, flip-flop for political expediency, and make unintelligent decisions on the whim? The answer is stress and anxiety.

Throughout a strain and long presidential campaign, the stress and anxiety is finally catching up with the messiah. I finally understand that when you are unable to keep your story together there is something subconsciously that triggers an organic physiological response which causes a tic. With the messiah's problem of flip-flopping and breaking promises, I'm very surprise that this hadn't happen years ago. As I have said, Obama is way over his head and it is starting to show because he has developed a facial tic under his right eye.

The tic on the lower part of his right orbital bone is clearly visible in his recent interview with ABC's Barbara Walters. The Obama camp say it first emerged during the primary season and has now become chronic. For those Obama supports who wanted the "perfect" president, what do you think of your messiah now? How will he be taken seriously when he presents himself to world leaders with a facial tic? How will he look presenting the state of the union address on national television? Base on Michelle Obama's rant that this country is a mean country in 2008, I have a funny feeling the America people will be dissuaded to support the "perfect" president with a physical flaw because we become accustomed as a society to embrace the materialistic physical beauty of the person above everything else. It's a pity that the message is drowned out by judging the physical aspect of the person. We are a flawed society, which can be blamed on what we see on TV and read in magazines.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

What Great Depression

I can recall the messiah's provoking words, "We only have one president at a time." But failed to mention, "But at the same time we can't hide." The audacity emanating from the Obama camp beginning to move into the Oval Office before the present president moves out. Is this the Chicago-thug "lets evict everybody" mentality? Giving these "fireside" news conferences, empty radio speeches, and teasing America of his cabinet picks is a bit of a stretch. I would think this is unprecedented for a man with no experience and arrogance that would top Donald Trump. Though, I am impress that the Bush Administration finds all of it very amusing. Bush could easily snipe, mock, or undermine Obama's transitions with a snap of a finger, but will not. I think Bush realize that Obama will undo his credibility when he enters office on Jan. 20, 2009. Why spoil his folly now?

You may ask, "What folly?" If you had listen to Obama speak, he always refers the current state of the economy as the worst economic environment since the Great Depression. It is the most over exaggerated misnomer for someone so inadequate to run this country. There may be a few of us out there who remembers the Great Depression, but honestly, we are not in one. To hear the media use the words "crisis", "meltdown", and "cataclysm" to "we are in a Great Depression", "million of job will be lost", and "we will never get out of it", I can only imagine if such diatribes were really true. We are not in a classical definition of a Great Depression. No one talks about 15 millions of jobs being created, but instead, they talk about a million jobs lost. No one talks about the gains in the stock markets over a period of 25 years, but yet, these same people are disheveled of temporary drop in the market this year alone. The only person to blame is you. The recession that many of you classify yourself is your own doing. No one told you to flip houses, take out a home equity loan for those extravagant trips, amass a huge credit card bill, and make bad financial decision. That is your fault. Where is self responsibility of our own destiny? There is your Great Depression and now, you are finding ways to get out it. There are consequences we choose in life that will either reward us or punish us. Jumping on the bandwagon, giving in to your selfish needs, and catching up with the "Jones" are recipes for disaster.

The problems we have are fixable. I do not need to tell you how. It is your duty as a responsible intelligent human being to fix it yourself.

But the problem that the media bombards us on a daily basis with negativity, death, and sorrow, we tend to forget to walk outside and see that everything looks the same. Nothing changes. I see my neighbors shopping, dressed the same, still packing a few extra pound, and look at ease as they did years ago during a very good economy. You do the same and you will come to the same conclusion.

You don't want to jinks yourself and claiming we are living in a Great Depression. That is unfounded. Look at the pictures during the time of the Great Depression and it is much of a catastrophe than it is today. No jobs, no food, and no fun. The Great Depression last over 12 years and it took WWII to get us out of it. In fact, back then, there are no safety nets or meaningful regulations to protect us from a certain fall. Now, we have unemployment benefits, food stamps, and welfare to keep those affected to stay afloat. Even though all these programs are very expensive, there is some avenue of relief to prevent further dismay. This Great Depression ideology by the mainstream media has affected many households throughout America. From there, the word is spread by wildfire. Consumer confidence drops, worrying about layoffs, and having to eat "SPAM" are contributing factors to be in a Great Depression in the eyes of the worried consumer. I say hogwash! Just go outside and see it for yourself. Perception is not reality. I feel sorry for those who made bad decisions that got themselves into a downward spiral, but changing a certain habit or lifestyle will get them out of the rut.

So, before getting depress, just know that there is always someone out there who is in worst shape than you. Before worrying about people you don't know, it's important to concentrate getting out your own rut. As soon as more and more people are getting back on their feet, we will get out of this Great Depression mentality. You know who really wants to see this Great Depression to continue. It's the politician that runs Washington. The more miserable we are, the better control they have over us.

Black Friday May Be Dangerous to Your Health

What have we become? This society has gone to the dogs. The Media proliferation of sex, drugs, homosexuality, deceit, and many immoral issues has sweep throughout America. We have lost our sense of common sense and our consistent complacency has destroyed the essential fundamental foundation that this country was founded on. No more having a parent taking care of the child when there is television, computers, and video games. No more exposing a child about complexities of life, but instead keeping them in a bubble from the outside world never letting them grow up. No more disciplining a child when it is frown upon by society and the fear of government intervention.



I have talked about this many months ago. Comparing from last year, I see a continual degradation of the family. I see spousal murder, spousal abuse, child abuse, children killing children, children killing adults, and children killing parents as the norm. What is wrong with this picture? A civil-minded individual would be horrid by the fact that we are being more selfish of our own needs and forgetting the needs of others. It doesn't help much when the fuel of the fire is bombarded on a daily basis by what the media feeds us.



Hence, yesterday was Black Friday. It is shopping season galore. The minute feeling of a hint of a recession has been temporarily forgotten since it is the festive season of love, reflection, and giving. I just came back from the mall yesterday to see, for my curiosity, the comparison between what the media calls a recession and how packed were the parking lots. I can say it is a good sign to see people go shopping. In this artificial economic downturn, people are shopping wisely than carefree, but I would never guess to see people acting like idiots. It is insane to see the behavior of a person when they see the word "sale." It is like a once in a lifetime opportunity soon to be lost forever when the supply is exhausted. Some people call it a tradition. I call it stupidity. To the more observant individual, these absurd “sales” only tell us that the actual price of the product is far cheaper than what it actually states.



But it doesn't remove the fact that these absurd "sales" should cause people to act like animals. Yesterday, there are news reports of fighting, shooting, and a horrifying death by stampede. When you have a gun fight at Toys R Us leading toward two deaths, wouldn’t you say that things are getting out of hand? When you have a temporary store clerk being trampled to death by a mob of thousands stampeding into Wal-Mart to get that $300.00 laptop, I think we need to take a step back and relax. When you have people physically yelling and fighting for a discounted 40% off Play Station system, I hope little Billy at home really appreciated the gift that his parents fought tooth and nail to get it.



This is what I call an embarrassment. This is what I call Liberalism. It’s losing ones individual responsibility with all rule of order thrown out the window.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

This Thanksgiving I Learned Something

In this moment while we celebrate Thanksgiving, we should be thankful we are alive and be counting our blessings. While we are floundering and moping because of a minor temporary economy meltdown, we are reminded that life is more precious and usually taken for granted.

This event of terrorism in India should be a reminder that there is something more important than our own self interest. This economy will survive, I promise. But when a life is taken away because of terrorism, we are handicapped physically and emotionally, which will have a direct impact to this economy and national security.

Just realize this. We put ourselves in peril when we voted in an inexperience fool who will help the terrorist to achieve their goal and decimate our will as Americans. Just remember, to keep this world safe from terrorism will impact the economy and our emotional well being in a positive way.

It's not the economy. The economy has no direct relationship to terrorism. It is national security that has a direct role to our economy. While mostly everybody have been thinking micro, a few of us were thinking macro. Only a minority of us sees beyond our self interest, and therefore will overcome the headaches and suffering that everybody is bitching about. We must not panic, we need to voice your concerns, we must prepare for the long term, and we must stop Obama from making it even worst.

Obama Will Take Care of India and Save the World

President-elect Barack Obama and UN chief Ban Ki-Moon led the global community condemnation of the terror attacks in Mumbai, India and called on the nations of the world to work together to root out and destroy terrorist networks. Big mistake! Just watch for the next 4 years how the United Nations and the Barack Obama will screw up our national security. It will be a huge blunder to get the UN involved. They are the most corrupt pansy-ass outfit of an organization, in which the US waste millions upon million of taxpayers dollars to keep it running.

Since the State Department said there were no known American casualties in the attacks, Indian television reported that Western hostages were being held in two five-star hotels where gunmen had carried out coordinated strikes.

More than 300 were also wounded in the highly coordinated attacks Wednesday night by bands of gunmen who invaded two five star hotels, a popular restaurant, a crowded train station, a Jewish center and at least five other sites, armed with assault rifles, hand grenades and explosives. The gunmen appeared to be holed up inside all three buildings on Thursday holding foreign and local hostages. Among those foreigners held captive were Americans, British, Italians, Swedes, Canadians, Yemenis, New Zealanders, Spaniards, Turks, a Singaporean and Israelis. It seems the terrorists appeared to have been targeting Britons and Americans. Base on Indian media reports, an unknown group calling itself the Deccan Mujahedeen claimed responsibility for the attacks.

Joe Biden was right after all. As predicted, it was less than 6 months before an international crisis will occur. I hope this will scare the living “bejesus” in Obama and realize that holding the highest office of the presidency does not lend to on the job training. National security and keeping the economy strong is the two top priorities the president is ultimately responsible. And it seems ironic we got an elected inexperience person to take charge of this country (Obama), who is clueless on foreign policy affairs and partly responsible for the economic debacle (Fannie Mae). It is funny how things come in full circle. Let's say that the horror seen in India is just a small preview of what will be in stored for the Obama Administration on Jan. 20, 2009. The smartest thing wonderboy has done is keeping Gates as Secretary of Defense. At least Obama realizes that putting any of his bozo Democrat friends as Secretary of Defense will compromise his bid for the 2012 elections. Yes, he is already looking that far in the future. Honestly, putting Gates in charge won't help any because Obama will weaken the infrastructure that will compromise everything.

I'm starting to notice that there some activity brewing in Afghanistan, Iran, Russia, and now, India. It seems Obama will have his hands full by the time he is become president on Jan 20. I hope the messiah is not over his head. Obama did say he will cast his hands and heal the world. Let's see it, wonderboy!

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

The Real Story of Thanksgiving (Rush Limbaugh)

The Real Story of Thanksgiving (Rush Limbaugh)
Rush Limbaugh.com November 21, 2006

By Rush Limbaugh



RUSH: Okay, time for the real story of Thanksgiving. I want to precede this by sharing with you -- and I want to bounce off of our last call, Suzie. Sometimes she has trouble being optimistic. Now, I don't know that this would qualify as something about which you can run around and feel really optimistic about. Something struck me the other day. (It strikes me a lot, by the way.) I went to a dinner party on Friday night, and it was a buffet here where I live before I had to go over to the Breakers Hotel and introduce Ann Coulter and give her an award for David Horowitz's Restoration Weekend. There were a lot of people at this bash, and walking through the buffet and looking at all of the food, the shrimp, all the vegetables and everything, the desserts, it just struck me.

[]I started flashing back to my trip to Afghanistan. I saw some of the most unbelievable human living conditions I have ever seen, and I can tell you for a fact that the number of average Afghanis who eat food in the way we take for granted is just astoundingly high. We hear all day long pessimistic stories about shortages of this or that, we're going to deplete the oceans of all edible fish in 30 years or whatever the hell stupid notion it was, and we've been hearing these kinds of stories for years, that we're destroying species. It always amazes me when I actually stop to think about it. Just visit a grocery store. Imagine how many grocery stores there are in this country. Look at the food production in this country alone, and look at the relative cheap price that food is in grocery stores.

You can find high priced items in there, but bare essentials, market basket prices. People have to eat. There's not a whole lot of room for price gouging there unless you go to gourmet places and that kind of thing, but even at that, they're available, if you want it. The amount of food that is produced in this country, the plenty of it, is astounding, when you stop to think that wherever you are, in your one grocery store or at your restaurant when you're having dinner, imagine millions of such places, with the same stuff, and then put it all in somebody's home, where they're having Thanksgiving or what have you, or in restaurants or whatever, it's just astounding to me. The ability of the earth to produce and provide all this, against all these predictions that we're going to starve or going to have a famine, that the population explosion is going to wipe out all of these luxuries and opportunities.

It's just... I don't know. Sometimes it just blows me away, because I don't have anything to do with producing it. There are people that do, and I'm just in awe. When you asked me why I am optimistic and so forth, it's because I am in awe of the country.

Compared to the rest of the world and compared to the attacks that we endure and even our own internal bottles of people in this country that hate this country, still look at it, look at it, if you want just from the bare essentials. Look at how many automobiles there are in a used car lot, look at how many automobiles there are in junkyards. Those are the cars in junkyards that are being driven around in places like Afghanistan or Cuba, anywhere else.

We're just spoiled I think in so many areas that just the basics are often so taken for granted that their value in what they represent is overlooked on occasion.

We can even satisfy oddballs that don't want to eat meat or who don't want to eat fish, whatever your culinary peculiarities are, somebody's out there making sure that you can get what you want, even with all the assaults on the food business that there have been.

Anyway, leads me to the real story of Thanksgiving as written by me in my book "See, I Told You So!" We're on Chapter Six here: "Dead White Guys or What Your History Books Never Told You," page 70.

On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs.

Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work.

"But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness," destined to become the home of the Kennedy family. "There were no friends to greet them, he wrote. There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning.

During the first winter, half the Pilgrims – including Bradford's own wife – died of either starvation, sickness or exposure.

"When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats." Yes, it was Indians that taught the white man how to skin beasts. "Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper! This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. "Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives, rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments.

Here is the part [of Thanksgiving] that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share.

"All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well. Nobody owned anything. They just had a share in it. It was a commune, folks. It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California – and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way.

Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives.

He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage, thus turning loose the power of the marketplace.

"That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened?

It didn't work! Surprise, surprise, huh?

What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation!

But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years – trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it – the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently.

What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future.

"'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years...that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing – as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote. 'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.'

Why should you work for other people when you can't work for yourself? What's the point?

"Do you hear what he was saying, ladies and gentlemen? The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property.

Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result?

'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'

Bradford doesn't sound like much of a... liberal Democrat, "does he? Is it possible that supply-side economics could have existed before the 1980s? Yes.

"Read the story of Joseph and Pharaoh in Genesis 41. Following Joseph's suggestion (Gen 41:34), Pharaoh reduced the tax on Egyptians to 20% during the 'seven years of plenty' and the 'Earth brought forth in heaps.' (Gen. 41:47)

In no time, the Pilgrims found they had more food than they could eat themselves.... So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians. The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London.

And the success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans and began what came to be known as the 'Great Puritan Migration.'"

Now, other than on this program every year, have you heard this story before? Is this lesson being taught to your kids today -- and if it isn't, why not? Can you think of a more important lesson one could derive from the pilgrim experience?

So in essence there was, thanks to the Indians, because they taught us how to skin beavers and how to plant corn when we arrived, but the real Thanksgiving was thanking the Lord for guidance and plenty -- and once they reformed their system and got rid of the communal bottle and started what was essentially free market capitalism, they produced more than they could possibly consume, and they invited the Indians to dinner, and voila, we got Thanksgiving, and that's what it was: inviting the Indians to dinner and giving thanks for all the plenty is the true story of Thanksgiving.

The last two-thirds of this story simply are not told.

Now, I was just talking about the plenty of this country and how I'm awed by it. You can go to places where there are famines, and we usually get the story, "Well, look it, there are deserts, well, look it, Africa, I mean there's no water and nothing but sand and so forth."

It's not the answer, folks. Those people don't have a prayer because they have no incentive. They live under tyrannical dictatorships and governments.

The problem with the world is not too few resources. The problem with the world is an insufficient distribution of capitalism.


HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

Obama Whines Because His Blackberry Will Be Taken Away

The hypocrites who attacked Sarah Palin for keeping a personal Yahoo! email account aren't making a fuss about Obama wanting to keep his precious Blackberry. I really wonder what is so important for Obama to keep his personal Blackberry. It is a national security risk to keep connected to people outside his immediate White House circle. I can't believe he is whining to keep his cell phone. The audacity of the messiah to do something that no president in the history of the White House is able to do.

I know that he won't have a direct line to his friends back in Chicago, but I know that Bill Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, George Soros, Tony Resko, Jeremiah Wright, and Louis Farrakhan will have an open door policy to the White House. So, what is the big deal?

But get this! You know what Obama said why he needs a personal Blackberry? He said that he was concerned that the isolated life of a president would limit his access to information from outside the bubble of the White House. It seems so obvious to the layman why it would be important to restrict Obama on his personal Blackberry use. For one thing, it is a national security issue because the president is limited in his electronic correspondences for fear of hacking. Additionally, presidential communications are strictly monitored and archived for historical purposes.

Obama stated, “One of the things that I’m going to have to work through is how to break through the isolation — the bubble that exists around the president. I’m in the process of negotiating with the Secret Service, with lawyers, with White House staff … to figure out how can I get information from outside of the 10 or 12 people who surround my office in the White House.”

Who the hell does are those 10 to 12 people outside the White House that he needs contact besides his radical associates? Is there something the messiah would like to share to the American public?

If he wants to contact his illegal aunt or his half brother, I think Obama can make an arrangement? Well, he is the messiah, I mean, president. For goodness sakes, it is only a cell phone. Obama, we will get you another nice new black cell phone you can use. Don't cry.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Colmes Breaking Up With Hannity at Fox! Good Ridden

My only source for news 24/7 is FOX News Channel (FNC). It is the only fair and balance 24-hour general news service covering breaking news as well as political, entertainment and business news.

It was announced on Monday that longtime talk show duo Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes will be parting at the end of the year. Hannity will remain in his current spot but Colmes will be moving on to other programs at the network.


The press release issued Monday by FOX News Channel’s (FNC):

Alan Colmes will relinquish his role as co-host of Hannity & Colmes at the end of the year. Colmes will continue to have a presence on FNC as he will serve as a liberal commentator on a variety of FOX News programming, including Foxnews.com’s The Strategy Room and continue hosting his radio program, The Alan Colmes Show on FOX Talk, a division of FOX News Radio. He will also begin developing a weekend program.


Since the show has ran for 12 years, it catapulted to number one in 2003 and never relinquishing the top spot. It is the second highest-rated program in cable news behind only The O’Reilly Factor.

But as Conservative talk radio thrived for decades, so too will Conservative TV programs. Colmes had no chance and portrayed very weak against Hannity. Colmes talking points were minute and twisting a context to expedite his rhetoric. It was pathetic to watch him debate with Hannity and their guest.

Honestly, I'm glad Colmes is out. Now, we will see a true Conservative attack his Liberal guest without stupid comments from Colmes. That what we need. It will allow Hannity more time to divest his questions in depth to scrutinize these idiotic Liberals, who have the gut to go on the show.

I am hedging that the Hannity Show will produce a larger viewing audience since we no longer have to hear the lunacy of Alan Colmes. Good ridden!

Obama a House Negro? Yeah? and.....

I need to interject the obvious stupidity of the month. This past week was abuzz with the news that Al-Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al Zawahri called President-elect Barak Obama a House Negro, a racially-charged term used by 1960s black American Muslim leader Malcolm X to describe black slaves loyal to white masters. I'm just impress that Al Zawahri knows anything about American Black History. I'm not perturb that an Al-Qaeda leader called Obama a "House Negro," but I'm annoyed by those hypersensitive morons who literally took the comment as an outrage.

Please get a life. To call him a "House Negro" would be missing the entire point of just who a "House Negro" is, and what he represents. Throughout the blogosphere, I read the protest like America overcame the evils of slavery, we still struggle with racism, but our system grants equal rights to people of all color, and Obama is a product of that struggle and an example of just how equal we are. Yada, yada, yada.

These Liberals and crazy Democrats must have forgotten their tirade using this racial epithet when they called Secretary of State Colin Powell a "House Negro" and when they called Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a "House Negro" and "Aunt Jemima?" I guess the Liberals had an absentminded moment. Hey, Al Sharpton publicly suggest that Powell and Rice as "House Negro". Does that make it right for anybody to call these racial epithet? It is yes or no and not maybe.

So before we get all outraged, let's remember this:
Al-Qaeda has murdered 3,000 Americans inside of 45 minutes to an hour-and-a-half; they have beheaded American journalists and a American citizen; they have committed all kinds of atrocities all over the world.  And now the American left (MSM and Al Sharpton particularly) is finally upset at Al-Qaeda dare to say something racist!  The Liberals turned a blind eye and allowed Al-Qaeda to kill whoever they want, and whenever they want. In return, Liberals will do their best to understand them, but when these enemies of the United States start using racist language, this is when Liberals put their foot down!  The media has toned down and even condone the actions of our enemy. From condemnation of Club Gitmo to showing sympathy of a child murderer, it reminds me that this society doesn't have their priorities in the right order.

Obama may be a "House Negro" not in the literal sense, but what else is new. Obama will be a puppet with a symbolic stature. The Democrat Majority and the special interest group that got Obama the White House will set his agenda to follow. Let's agree that Obama is the most Liberal Senator based on his record in the state legislator in Illinois and the US Senate. He ran way left during the Democrat primary and tried to run as a moderate during the general election. He funded a campaign from unknown scrupulous donors like Mickey Mouse and Howard Hughes. Obama is influence, by his own choice, radical associates ranging from a terrorist to a corrupt businessman, who supported his campaign. It seems that there are a lot of people Obama owes for winning the White House.

Don't be fool by his leadership. His good fortunes are pure coincidences. It is incredible that a man, who was a community organizer turned to an ineffective state senator then to a 3 year term US Senator, who only served 1 year while running for presidency, is able to achieve highest job in the land without any experience. It is now what you know; it's who you know. That is how Obama will govern this country. Obama owes so many people that he will be an lame duck president. We are seeing Obama returning the favor back to his "master." Obama's policy will be ramrod unbeknownst to the public eye. Already, he is planning to return the favor of his donors like the unions with the Employee Free Choice Act and the Pro-Choice movement with the Freedom of Choice Act.

So, Al-Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al Zawahri is not completely wrong with his statement.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Employee Free Choice Act is what Obama Wants. He is such a Typical Thug

In April 2008, then-Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said in Philadelphia, “I’ve fought to pass the Employee Free Choice Act in the Senate. And I will make it the law of the land when I’m president of the United States of America.”
 
President-elect Obama will move into the White House with increased Democratic majorities in both the House and Senate, which also support legislation designed to end of the declining union membership.
 
The bill replaces the secret ballot by allowing union organizers to publicly ask workers to sign a card in favor of unionizing. If a bare majority of employees approve, then an employer would have to recognize the union. Also, under the proposed bill, if parties can’t settle a dispute within 120 days, the dispute goes to an arbitration panel that can impose a contract that is binding for two years. Opponents of the bill say that would take away any incentive for either side to negotiate.
     
Card check passed the Democratic House last year but died in a Republican-led filibuster. As long as Republicans have 40 votes in the Senate, they can stop the bill.
 
It is not the Employee Free Choice Act, but rather, it is the forced choice act. There is no problem with the private ballot. If you eliminate that, it opens it up to coercion.
 
If Obama supported the proposal right away, it would cause uproar from small business owners across the country.
 
This could be a great opportunity for Obama to stand up against an issue that is bad for the country and would be bad for him, but this would be impossible, since his campaign was hugely funded by union supporters. Also, labor unions contributed about $400 million this year to congressional candidates who support the bill, according to the Workforce Fairness Institute. If the bill passes, the institute states unions can anticipate a rise in unionization to 80 percent.
 
I found a Heritage Foundation study citing evidence of coercion at workplaces where card check was used. An example of coercion was a card check campaign at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Union organizers said that workers who did not sign union cards would lose their jobs. Another example was a case with a United Steel Workers of America official threatened to report migrant workers to federal officials if they did not sign the cards. Well, I think that was self explanatory and very obvious of the abuse.

If you are unsure what Obama supports, just wait an see. I coming in bits and pieces, but shortly you will be shocked of his Socialistic views. Suppression and oppressing the voice of the American people is what you can expect from a thug-like Obama administration.

That's the change you can count on!

Friday, November 21, 2008

I May Not Own A Pet But I Do Love Dogs

I May Not Own A Pet But I Do Love Dogs

I'm going to digress from my political format and talk about something that majority of Americans can relate to emotionally and with sincere empathy.

For many of those who know me, I don't own a dog or cat. I am probably one of those outsiders who just don't understand the attachment between owner and pet. It wasn't until a good friend of mine brought to my house a cute puppy. It was a 10 week year old Shiba Inu. Watching this puppy grow up to a full size dog, my whole attitude and opinion about dogs and cats dramatically changed.

Being a pet lover, even though I don't own a dog or cat, the joys and therapeutic effects of having a pet also bring pain and undo psychological stress. I finally understand what pain and sadness feels like when a close friend of mine from Pennsylvania called me today and told me that the family decided to put down their dog. I actually shed a tear over the phone. It was a weird experience. Ask me ten years ago, I probably would had given you a different reaction.

This gut check I experienced made me realize that losing someone you love is the same whether it is human or animal. I finally understand that the connection to a pet has a stronger affinity than the relationship to other people. This is because animals provide us a special type of companionship and emotional intimacy that humans are unable to provide for each other. Tell me if I'm wrong. I believe that humans have a difficult time to give themselves freely to another person without expectation or judgement. The bond we have to a pet is indescribable and beyond words. It explains the way we feel when we hold a pet in our lap, the pleasure we get in watching them enjoy life, and their uncanny ability to know when we need comforting.

This special bond between owner and pet holds a great level of intimacy. It is this close bond that they share, which makes it impossible to cope when a pet dies. Like losing a loved one, a death of a pet can bring a huge emptiness and loneness in a home.

In today's society, pet have gone from the dog house to the bedroom. Our culture has accepted that the relationship between owner and pet are extremely important. We actually humanize our pets. We care for them much the same way parents care for their children. We feed our pets with the right food, provide medicine and medical care, and give them plenty of toys. There are owners that take their pets to daycare, take them for long walks, and let them run crazy at a dog park. I would call this relationship between owner and pet as "pet parent."

The only problem I find is that there isn't a lot of support groups for the grief process that results from a loss of a pet. I think talking to someone who has a pet or understand the gravity of the matter are the only choices that we have under our disposal. My only suggestion for my friend to help cope with his loss is a holding memorial service, make a scrapbook, donating money to a local shelter in his pet's name, and keeping something that was special of his dog like her favorite toy or keeping her ID tags.

I am not sure if my suggestions help, but he was grateful that he was able to talk to someone who can empathize with his loneness and pain. I am just grateful to be there for him and being part of his dogs life. Her name was Shelby and she was a gorgeous German Shepherd.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Never Allow a Crisis to Go To Waste

Never allow a crisis to go to waste

This is a real crisis that cannot be ignored. I don't feel sorry for Obama, but for the idiot voters that voted for him. As I said in my first sentence, we are in a crisis. I wonder if the voters now believe they had made a mistake. I wonder if these Obama supports honestly trust that their messiah can fix the economy, trade, the credit market, Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, the automaker bailout, the pirates hijacking oil tankers for ransom, the slumping stock market, Russian Putin wanting to come back in power, Israel and Palestine conflict, and Iran achieving enough nuclear material to make an atomic bomb.

In these trouble and uncertain times, I wonder if the American people made the right choice. With majority of Obama supports showing a lack of intelligence base on a Zogby's comprehensive poll after the election, I highly doubt the American people knew the implications of their decision in putting an inexperience man in office.

The market flocculation can be blamed on Obama's presidency. I don't want to hear the mumbo-jumbo of the metrics of the economy. This market is a psychological device showing how the American people feel. The market is run base on pure emotions. If you know owning a business, it is based on preparing for tomorrow. When you have a president who will raise our taxes, these companies will prepare for it. The will cut down on payroll, equipment, and change the way they invest. This is what we are seeing now.

The only way to solve most of our economic woe is to have the messiah make an announcement that he will not raise any taxes during this economic downturn. If he did that, you will see the market jump 1000 points and we will get out of this recession, but that is only a fantasy.

WHERE THE HELL IS OBAMA? I know he is not president yet, but he can talk to the American people of his plan. He can talk to the automakers and help resolve the crisis. Obama can start discussing among the leaders in Washington the direction he wants to lead. I though Obama would heal the world and it seems there is a world crisis that needs comforting. Heck, the American people needs reassurance and stabilize their confidence.

We already know what's going to happen. The market is reflecting on our current crisis and how we feel. Let me fill you in for those who are clueless. Obama's Chief of Staff said that they are planning big things because our current crisis provides an opportunity to get it done. Yeah, that is what Rahm Emanuel said.

The actual quote Emanuel said, "Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste. They are opportunities to do big things."

Under this view, the need to accomplish big-government action is the problem, and the crisis is the solution.

Keep this in mind, people of America. Is Obama's goal to fix the crisis -- or to use it to accomplish other things that he wanted to accomplish anyway?

So, I pose to the intellect Obama supporters this question. What do you think Emanuel meant? Let me help with the answer. Obama will allow the market to tank in order that he can spend like a drunken sailor to get out of it. It is a short term solution with a devastating long term effect. In other words, Obama will tax like crazy to get out of this mess.