Friday, October 31, 2008

From $250,000 to $120,000 Obama Is Not Serious About His Tax Cuts

Obama said that he won't tax anybody making less than $250,000. Then, Obama refines that number to $200,000. That is fine. Refining a position is okay.

Then Biden states $150,000.

Now, Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM) says that Obama will not tax anybody making $120,000.

This tells me that Obama will do crap regarding to tax breaks to the middle class. Obama will give in to Pelosi and Reid and will raise everybody's tax.

The warning is there. Obama and his cronies are telling us point blank of their intentions. We are stupid if we ignore the obvious.

Obama is Wrong to Call Us Selfish Not Giving More in Taxes

Obama tried to explain his tax increase is not socialism.

He said at a rally in Sarasota, Fla., yesterday,

"The reason that we want to do this, change our tax code, is not because I have anything against the rich. I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the American dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific."

"The point is, though, that -- and it’s not just charity, it’s not just that I want to help the middle class and working people who are trying to get in the middle class -- it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise. That’s what happened in the 1990s, that’s what we need to restore. And that’s what I’m gonna do as president of the United States of America."

"John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic. You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness."

Obama is extremely misguided. Socialism is a redistribution of wealth from one class to another. It is Socialism when a thug-like Obama government will force the sweat that we worked for and give it to those who don't. Is it wrong for those who want to keep their hard-earned tax dollars as "selfish?"

Last I checked, this has been done before to no avail! Everyone should take responsibility for their own lives. We are not trying to keep poor people poor, but there is a lot of opportunity out there, one has to make their way! We are taught to not give our kids everything, to let them "earn" their way, and that is what all of us need to do in America!

Secondly, we are not to work for the government, it is supposed to work for us! How dare someone in the Government tell me what I am supposed to do with my hard earned money! So, if everyone else is a victim, then it is time for those who work hard to become the "new" victim? I don't think so! We are all unique, and we all need to earn our way!!! This is the American way, and the American dream!

Obama wanting to go back to the broken tax promises of the Bill Clinton's presidency is an obvious tall tale sign that Obama will raise taxes in this economic downturn.

First off, many think of a small business making $300,000 would be able to give an additional $2300 in taxes. And yes you are right, if I was the employer and you work for me, I couldn't hire someone for $2300 a year. But guess what, when it comes time for me to give you a raise, I'll give you a raise less the $2300 I will have to pay to Obama. Or instead of giving you an extra $2300 worth of health insurance, I'll send it to Obama. Or if I don't have employees instead of spending that extra $2300 I will send it to Obama. And that $2300 won't be spent at a restaurant or at a furniture store or on a vacation. And guess what? The restaurant or furniture store or hotel will need one less employee (or fraction of employee via reduced hours) because it won't have me as a customer.

In the 90s the Democrats decided to put a tax on yachts. Since you know, only the rich buy yachts and they could afford it. Except guess what happened? Rich people stopped buying yachts and within 2 years 7600 jobs in the yacht business were lost. It was so severe that the tax was repealed.

You'd think Liberals would have learned a lesson from that. Sadly of course they didn't.

So, before calling people who work and earn their keep as selfish, I would like to pose this question. Is it right for the government to raise our taxes so they can give it to those who don't pay any taxes? Call it welfare, a handout, or Socialism, it is all the same thing.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Even Whoopi Goldberg Admits Democrat Politicians Will Raise Taxes

I would put Academy Award-winning actress Whoopi Goldberg as the poster child of every American who support the Democrat party. It would be fair to say she represents Hollywood, the Mainstream Media, the left wing nuts, and the angry Democrats, who are sick of George W. Bush.

She gave a revealing interview that demonstrates the public opinion among Democrats.

She said,

“Whenever Democrats get in, taxes do go up. . . I believe that it doesn’t matter who gets into office, taxes are going to go up. We have two wars and a lot of stuff to pay for, and a lot of unanswered questions --so it’s not surprising to me.”
Again, she repeats herself,

“As you know, whenever Democrats get in, taxes do go up. . . And if they go up and they work the way that Bill Clinton’s tax plan worked, I’m okay with that.”

Then, she finally said,

“Everybody’s taxes are going up and, you know, nobody wants to raise taxes, nobody wants to pay more taxes, but if we want the freedoms that we talk about having, we want them for everybody. . . We want everybody to be able to go to the doctor. We want everybody to be able to do all the things they want to do. Then somebody’s got to pay for it, and it’s people making a lot of dough, and that’s the way the American system has always been.”

Well she is right in a way. Someone will have to pay for it. What she is not telling you is that the Democrat Majority in Congress will take away our deductions from our 401K and other deductible retirement accounts and will permanently repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), a tax that will be paid nearly exclusively by 25 million middle-class families. Whoopi is right that it will be people with lots of dough who will pay for the freedom that we talk about having. Those people she is referring to is YOU. It will be people who holds a pension plan and those who holds a good job. That is practically everybody in America.

Hey, Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden was criticized by Republicans, and others, for saying it is “patriotic” for the rich to pay higher taxes. We already heard Obama told Joe “The Plumber” in Ohio that he wants to “spread the wealth around” with his tax plan. Doesn't that tell you something?
Beside Obama and Biden's gaffe, Whoopi is not immune to make the same mistake.

During her interview she said, "The more you make, the more you pay and that’s not socialism, that’s not anything but the American way.” Yet she forgets to say that it wrong for the government to take more money from us and redistribute that to those who don't pay any taxes. That is called Socialism.

If the Democrats really believe in this crap, supports Obama in this election, and Obama wins, I hope that every single Obama voter gets the shaft. We will see young voter unable to get a job because Obama will ruin the economy. We will see working people get screwed when the Democrats take away the deductions from our 401K and other retirement account. Therefore, it will make it hard for us to save. We will see the elderly abandoned by an Obama Health Care Plan. Socialize medicine will ration the medical needs of our elderly. By nationalizing our health care system, the idea is take care of those who will get well faster. Therefore, the elderly will understand why socialize medicine failed in Canada, UK, and Australia.

Obama is wrong for America. Why take that chance?

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Phillies Win the World Series so Will John McCain this November

I will predict this election. Tonight, the Philadelphia Phillies won the World Series. The last time the Phillies were the World Champs was back in 1980.

Do you remember who won the Presidential Election that year?

A Republican named Ronald Reagan.

Can this be a good omen? I am going to say Mcain will win this election and will shock the world just like the miracle that the Phillies gave us tonight.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

$250,000 $200,000 $150,000. MAKE UP YOUR MIND OBAMA

Obama said that no one will get tax making less than $250,000. Then Obama modified his position by saying that no one will get tax making $200,000. Now, Biden just said that no one will be tax less than $150,000.

MAKE UP YOUR MIND!! This should tell you that Obama is saying anything to get elected.

I'm waiting what the next magical number will be tomorrow.


Michael Savage Tells Independent Voter to Vote McCain

I have never been a fan of talk show personality Michael Savage because of his constant rant against the Bush Administration and his typical segue into topics nothing related to politics. I find it boring, but when Michael Savage talks against Liberalism and radical Islam, he is one of the most intelligent speakers on talk radio.

Savage is not a conservative, but a free wheeling Independent that holds the key to the majority of Independents in America. He has done something that I never would have guess. I actually heard him endorse John McCain.

Savage told listeners of his nationally syndicated radio show today: “I intended not to endorse anyone for this election prior to this week. But the more I have learned about Obama, the more I realized I cannot sit on the sideline. So I have to officially say, and sadly so, that I am going to endorse John McCain, for whatever it’s worth. I have put my own ego aside and I have to say what’s best for America. I’ll take my chances with the old war horse and even with Sarah Palin, who I’m not really a big fan of, by the way, over this naked Marxist revolutionary, because I don’t want to see what the next Pol Pot’s liable to do to the world.”

I have heard a past program of Michael Savage many months ago of a listener who said that the Independents in America are asking for some kind of signal. Finally, Savage, the man who represents many Independents and undecided voters, gave that signal and said he will support McCain over that Marxist renegade (Obama).

Many are wondering to themselves why this is significant? Well, Michael Savage may not get the notoriety like Rush or Hannity, but he does command 8 million listeners per week on his radio show and 2.4 million hits per month on his website.

I consider it very significant and increasingly helpful for the McCain campaign. As Rush Limbaugh once said, "one way or another, we will drag McCain over that finish line."

If a One party System with Republicans Failed, Democrats Won't Fair Any Better

That dumbass DNC Chairman Howard Dean said yesterday that he’s real excited working with a one party system controlling all aspects of government.

Dean said on MSNBC, “Republicans had a chance to rule. They failed miserably. I think it’s time to give the other party a chance.”

Can we agree that two wrongs don't make a right? Look at the statement Dean made. Actually, Dean is saying that a Republician one party system screwed up America. Now, it's the Democrats turn. But let me remind everybody that Democrats are the problem child. They are the cause of the woes we experience. The Democrats lead us to the Great Depression. Their ineptness in the 90's gave us 9/11. Their corruption with Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac gave us the economy we are suffering today. Now, by giving them the tri-fecta on November 4, it would be a utterly disastrous.

If Dean's argument is saying that “You cannot trust Republicans with your money. They will borrow and spend, borrow and spend, borrow and spend,” then it would be fair to say, "You cannot trust Democrats with your money. They will redistribute your money to everybody and they will spend like no tomorrow because they have no discipline to save."

Pelosi Promise Bipartisanship. Yeah, Heard That Before

Recently, Pelosi gave talk in promoting the Democrat agenda, which includes education and rebuilding the nation's infrastructure with green technology.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi promised that the new majority Congress will "Grow the economy, create good paying jobs, in the future in a way that is a green recovery, geared toward Main Street and is fiscally sound."

Then she address not to worry of a super Democrat Majority. As she is anticipating a Democrat Majority in both chambers of Congress, Pelosi wanted to reassure the audience's concern of a one party system in Washington.

Pelosi said:
"Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you that if the Democrats win, and have substantial majorities, Congress of the United States will be more bipartisan."


Bipartisan? Surely, you jest! If she is anticipating a Democrat filibuster-proof Congress, why does she need Republican approval. We know the Democrat Majority will ramrod every single wasteful program. So let them and piss us off and get them voted out next year. Republicans might as well not show up for work.

I cannot stand listening to her. What the hell did the Democrat Majority do for the past two years as the Majority. I will say, "Jack S**T!"

McCain said it best to point out that the threesome of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid is a dangerous combination. The three are the most Liberal leaders in Washington, D.C. I can guarantee chaos and corruption that we have to stomach for another 12 months till the next election.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi promised that Democrats will do a better job. Yeah, I heard that before.

Obama Finds the Constitution Flawed

Obama is stating that the taped interview of his Socialist views regarding to the Supreme Court is a plan by Drudge Report, FoxNews, and the right-wing Conservative party to distort and take the words out of contexts. How can that be? It was his own words and he was over 8 years old when this interview occurred. This bozo said it and changing this into a distraction won't work.

Obama stated that he wants the Supreme Court to venture into issues of wealth redistribution and more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. As I said it in my last blog, this is SOCIALISM.

There is one more clarifying thought I like to add .  Barack Obama complains that the Constitution is a “charter of negative liberties." That’s because the Constitution was intended as a limiting document, to curtail the power of the federal government vis-a-vis the states and the individual.  The founders intended at the time to limit the reach of the federal government, and built the Constitution accordingly.

I guess Barack must been asleep during Constitutional law class because this is basic Law 101. And this is the guy who taught Constitutional law as a law professor. If he read the Federalist Paper, Obama wouldn't made this kind of mistake, unless he truly favors Socialism like Senator Sanders from Vermont.

If Barack Obama wants to be president, how the hell is he going to defend the Constitution if he thinks it's flawed? It seems Barack Obama wants to reverse that entirely. That will happen by putting Fascist Judges in the Supreme Court.

And you know what? That’s a radical change you’d better believe in.

Monday, October 27, 2008

This Election is about the Supreme Court. Dont Let Obama Take It

Yesterday, I wrote a blog of my predictions of an Obama presidency, and today, my one of my predictions have been confirmed from the Drudge Report.

I mentioned that Obama will have an opportunity to put 2-3 Justices to the Supreme Court tilting the views of their rulings radically to the left. In the Drudge Report, there is a YouTube video purporting the views how Obama would like to see the Supreme Court be conducted.

The 'Joe the Plumber' remark about spreading the wealth was no gaffe. Obama meant it and that was no accident. He wants to see the Supreme Court to favor spreading the wealth for fairness to all. Obama went on say that the Supreme Court under Justice Warren was not radical. Yeah, right! It is more like not radical enough because Obama feels that giving rights to the convicted is not sufficient. Remember, we had a glimpse of Obama's adamant view in the Democratic primary debate when Charles Gibson asked him why he didn't support the fact that cutting corporate tax increase revenues. Obama conceded, but added, "I wants to see an increase in capital gains tax for fairness to the American people." My friends, that is called Socialism.

With 7 judges in the Supreme Court in their 70's, including Justice Ginsberg and Steven's mentioning retirement in the next Administration, Obama will definitely get that chance to radically screw the court system and take this country to the wrong direction. Under the surface, this election is all about the Supreme Court and selection of judges. The economy will eventually rebound, but the rules that make the laws of this land are permanent.

Are you ready to see a major crisis turned into a horrible nightmare?

Sunday, October 26, 2008

In this Economic Crisis there is Some Good News

Let me tell you some good news. The national survey shows gas prices continue to decline, tumbling nearly 53 cents a gallon in the last two weeks. The national average price of a gallon of regular gasoline $2.78.

Besides gas prices dropping, not as quickly compared to the price of a barrel to oil, we are seeing an inverse relationship to the dollar. Guess what? The strength of the dollar is getting stronger. This improvement will bode well to the American people and the investor.

Another strange benefit to this economic crisis is what's happening to the illegal aliens in this country. They are leaving in droves because there are no jobs for them here.

I have to say that this is a drastic measure to get positive results. If the Democrats claim credit, it would be the most embarrassing moment in the history of their party.

All these recent developments are artificial and temporary. Once conditions improve, all these gains will reverse. That's why we need to do things to be less dependent on foreign oil, strengthen the dollar, and close the borders. By doing that, we will see more permanent results.

My Predictions if Barack Obama Gets the White House

I have been getting complaints that I write most of my blogs against Obama, but I feel that it's of dire importance to voice a realistic view of events that will affect each one of us.

I will never understand the psyche of anyone who supports Obama. Is it guilt? Is it something you really haven't put much thought? Is it because you feel it's a civic duty?

Whatever moronic reasons you can conjure up, let me predict for you what will happen with an Obama presidency.

- If a super Democratic majority in the Senate, House, and the White House are realized, you will see suppression of the conservative talk radio and the new media outlet.

- Barack will double capital gain tax rate, which will cause a major sell off in the stock market. Currently, we are seeing the results of panic in Wall Street because fear of an Obama presidency.

- Like Bill Clinton reneging not to raise our taxes, Obama will have no choice, but do the same. With all those Socialist plans that Obama wants, he needs money to fund it.

- This $250,000 magic number we have been inundated for weeks is a crock of crap. You will see every American family making $100,000 pay close to 60% of their income in taxes.

- The do-nothing Congress will continue to do what they do best - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, except for spending more than any Congress in American History.

- Obama will weaken the Patriot Act and would increase our vulnerability to terrorist.

- Assure that a major international crisis will occur months after Bush leaves office under a Obama. presidency

- Obama will socialize medicine in America though federal insurance that will include illegal aliens

- Obama will pull troops out of Iraq immediately causing for the next president to clean up the mess Obama left.

- You will see that recession that every doom and gloom idiots were hoping for the past several years.

- Obama will allow the Bush tax cuts to expire.

- Obama will fix Social Security by raising Social Security, income, and payroll tax.

- Obama will end the tax deductions that we enjoy in our contributions to our retirement.

- Obama will allow illegal immigration to run amuck and give these illegal aliens the right to vote.

- Obama will have the opportunity to nominate 2 to 3 Liberal Supreme Court Justices and revert the Supreme Court to the radical left.

- Obama will screwed up health care system that will ration medicine like England and Canada. The elderly will be affected the most

- We will end up a big-time nanny welfare state.

Is that what you really want? Please believe what I say. Barack Obama has no experience to be President, Senator, or a community organizer. He is a crooked politician.

A Super Democrat Majority WILL Bring Anguish and Despair

McCain said having Democrats in control of the White House, the U.S. House of Representatives under Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and the Senate under Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, would give Democrats unlimited power.

The Democrats are expected to increase their majorities in both houses of Congress on election day.

There are hints that the Democrat will propose cutting the military budget by 25%, immediately withdraw military support in Iraq, let most of Bush's tax cuts to expire, reinstate the AMT in 2009, and eliminate the tax deduction from our 401k and all retirement plans. Besides that, every single wasteful projects dating back from the 70's will be ramrod though a super Democrat Majority. Thus, we will see huge revenues created from being over tax and failed programs that will inundate the American people.

McCain said that Obama's tax policies have been used before during the 70's and failed. Why would the same policies that failed over 30 years ago would work today? Any tax increase will not create jobs. Government does not create jobs. That is not what the founding fathers had in mind for this country. The answer to a strong economy is not higher taxes, and during this economic crisis, it is STUPID to raise taxes on anybody.

McCains summed up everything I said and he adds, "But that is exactly what's going to happen if the Democrats have total control of Washington. We can't let that happen. Are you ready for Obama, Pelosi and Reid?"

If the American people allows an unchecked super majority of Democrats to control Washington, be prepared to witness the next 12 month of anguish till the next election. Don't bitch and whine if you allow it to happen. Just blame only youself.

Obama and Biden Cherry Pick Their Interviews

Laura K. McGinnis, Central Florida communications director for the Obama campaign, stated, "This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election."

This was a backlash from the Obama campaign because WFTV-Channel 9's Barbara West gave two questions that pissed off Sen. Joe Biden.

I know that the mainstream policy is to generally pick and choose softball questions during interviews with Obama or Biden, but I think this reporter shocked Biden because she wasn't compliant to the norm.

My concern about Obama is that he will cherry pick who interviews him and tell these interviewers what questions they can ask. If Obama wins, I can see another Woodrow Wilson Administration remerge into another nightmare.

My only criticism about Bush is his lack to explain his plans in detail. This is no difference with Obama. Unlike Bush, whose greatest achievement is keeping this country safe, Obama will be suppressing the media and subdue the critics and jeopardize the safety of this country.

If Obama gets elected, be prepared for a real Fascist government. If left uncheck, a Obama, Pelosi, and Reid control will ruin this country. I don't believe in polls. I hope the American people have the common sense not to make that mistake. If your belief is that it's nice to vote a black man to the White House, please make sure it's the right one. Obama is not right for this country. Don't tell me about change and helping the middle class. It's a bumper slogan used since FDR.

I just want to understand why would anybody vote for Obama? If the reasons are Bush failed policy, don't want another Bush term, McCain will raise our taxes, or anything related to Palin, you are a "fcuking" idiot!

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Democrats Wants to Control Your Retirement Account

The Democrat Majority is beginning the preparations for an Obama presidency. We are seeing Congress talking about taking over America literally. They are talking about bailing out the banking industry, the mortgage market, the insurance company, and now, they want to take over your pension.

I want to talk to all of you who have a pension or retirement vehicle like a 401(k)s, IRA, or SEP/Keogh plans. The first thing I want to do is share with you something that Joe Biden said on the campaign trail in Colorado. Biden vowed that an Obama presidency will target executives of failing companies who draw big salaries.  Biden said, "Their pensions go first." Now, I want you to stop for a moment and consider what Joe Biden said.

Biden is talking about something the Democrats in Congress are willing to tinker and that is toying with your 401k plan.

The greed that Liberals have for your tax dollars, as evidenced by Obama, who cannot wait to get his paws on your money, is striking. If you allow the Democrats to take away CEO pensions, then don't be surprise they take away yours too. 

Guess what. They are doing it in Argentina. They are nationalizing everybody's pensions.  Did you know that because of Argentina nationalizing the peoples pensions, they lost 26% of the value of their stock market? And that was only in one week. If you don't believe me, then look it up.

The failures in the private sector are minuscule compared to the continued massive failures of Big Government.  Everything the government touches have unintended consequences. When things goes wrong, they get to act like innocent bystander and point fingers at everybody else. Can you say Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac? 

I want to remind you, two weeks ago a long time Democrat Congressman George Miller from California, who chairs some congressional committee, said, "We're going to have to do something about the tax deductibility of contributions to people's 401(k)s because government's losing money.  We're losing money on this." So, this idiot is proposing to eliminate the deductibility of whatever you contribute to your 401(k) or any form of retirement. 

Now, we don't know if Obama would go along with this, but the odds are pretty good that he will. So you can talk about all of this private sector greed and so forth, and government going out and take some CEO's pension, but understand what the Democrats are planning to do. Your 401(k) is no longer deductible.

If you are weary of my statements, read the piece from James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal titled "Are 401(k)s Safe from Congressional Democrats?"  

I know you're scared to look at your 401(k) statements when they come in, but are your 401(k)s safe from congressional Democrats?  NO!! They're not safe from Democrats right now because Democrats are the cause what we're all experiencing. Now, they want to radically change how we invest. The market turmoil has some politicians on Capitol Hill eyeing the end of the 401(k) as we know it.

There is a plan that the Democrats are considering to convert your 401(k) and administered them by the Social Security Administration. Your private retirement plan becomes owned by the government.  From my understanding, the money in turn would be invested in a special government bonds that would pay 3 percent a year, adjusted for inflation.

Now, the Democrats thinks we would go for this because we cannot stomach the wild market swings, and seeing our 401(k) plunge. I want to say, "it is a scam." We weathered the stock market crash in 1987 and 9/11. What makes you think a bankrupt system like Social Security will save us? Would you like a guaranteed 3% a year return on your 401k plan by the Social Security Administration for giving up the tax breaks on your 401(k) contributions and earnings?

This is one of many ways how the Democrats will screw the American people to fund Obamas new spending spree. This is one area in my life that I detest any government to manipulate my retirement plan. This infringement is unconstitutional to my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit toward happiness and this idiotic scam needs to stop! The government has no right to be in total charge of my retirement. Hell, I rather take my chances and forego the 401k contribution and let a broker make my money grow. If there is no benefit to a 401k or any other retirement vehicle, why put money in it?

Don't you see what the Democrats want? They want to eliminate any form of tax deduction in our retirement account. They will take that deduction, which should be ours, and spend it! While the Democrats spend it, we will have one less vehicle to lower our adjustable gross income and guess what? Our tax rate's going to go up because our adjusted gross income is not going to have our retirement deduction, and guess what this is going to do?  It's going to push more people into Obama's new tax increase bracket.  It's going to push more people over the $250,000-a-year magic number.  Right now this is not an Obama proposal. I want to make sure that you understand, this is a Democrat Party proposal, but either way, we are still screwed.

If you don't believe me, ask an Argentinian if they are satisfied with their retirement portfolio. You are not going to get many happy faces.

Let me tell you the Democrat Philosophy

I take offense to Barack Obama's comments that he feels we grow the economy from the bottom up.

You know, one of the first rules of life that I learned is if you're going to go out there and speak about something, you first better know your stuff. Obama has no idea about small businesses because he & Michelle never ran a business. He thinks making over $250,000 is "rich."  It's not.  Besides paying workers' comp, liability, health care, yearly bonuses, and sick time, Obama does not take into consideration the financial risk small business owners take every day to open their door.

But Obama doesn't care about the greedy business owner, he wants the struggling employees. Those are the votes he wants.  Obama wants these employees resenting the employer.  He wants employees resenting big corporations. This is where the 'messiah' comes in to praise the word that he will promote change.

Can you see a pattern? It is the foundation of the Democratic Party. It is to suppress an individual to the point that they become dependent on the government. That's what Democrats want, and when that happens, they want to be able to blame on the small or big business, as they have been for years, for being greedy and selfish and not sharing their wealth and so forth, even after they go out of business.

This class warfare has consequences.
According to Obama's plan not taxing anybody making less than $250,000, it would be smart not exceeding that number. Therefore, to prevent giving that extra tax to Obama, there will be people who will lose their jobs. Also, if the idea for business not to exceed over $250,000 and the 4% surtax that's attached to it, how are small businesses going to grow? It's damn if you do or damn if you don't. No matter how you look at it, if Obama gets elected, we are screwed.

So to my Democrat friends, who feel that they're going to get this "change" when Barack Obama's elected, let me tell you what will happen. We must get rid of the notion of this socialist belief that employer & employee needs to be equal. Obama's tax plan will not elevate the employee to the level of their employer, but the other way around.

What Obama is going to do is take away from everybody above you and 'redistribute' that so that everybody will be equal with you.  Your life is not going to change, but a lot of other people's will change and they will be brought down to your level. Then let's see what they say when they find out change does not mean that their own economic circumstance improves.

Democrats punish achievement, and they think everybody's should be on the same playing field. Well, the only way that can happen is if we're all miserable.  Everybody will be equally miserable, and that's what the Democrats are going to do. If you think Obama's change involves you getting happy, forget it - unless you want to be happy because other people are getting screwed.  That's the Democrat philosophy.

That is why I'm a conservative Republican & will vote for McCain because I don't agree with the Liberal Socialist ideology. Besides, Obama is not suppose to run because he is not an American citizen.

Friday, October 24, 2008

Obama Take Pro-Choice to a Radical Extreme

To my Christian friends, we are living proof that being pro-life is the foundation of our moral existence. I believe that every human life begins at conception. It is a medical fact that a heart beat can be heard at 16 days and a brain wave can be measured at 44 days. Life does not being with nothing. Therefore, a baby's life begins at the point of conception. That is why I am proud to be pro-life.

The election is in ten days, and our moral virtues are threatened by a man who disregards life. Barack Obama has displayed as a person who not only is pro-choice, but radically anti-life.

Obama has demonstrated his intent to split this nation in half. His claim to be a uniter is bogus. Instead, he will divide the moral structure of this society to the left.

Obama said the following:

"The first thing I'd do as president is to sign the Freedom of Choice Act"- Obama speaking before the Planned Parenthood Action Fund on July 17, 2007. If enacted, the Freedom Choice Act would nullify any state or local restrictions on abortion.

Pastor Rick Warren asked Obama, "At that point does a baby get human rights in your view?"

Obama answered, "Well, you know, I think that whether you're looking at it from a theological perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade."- Obama interviewed at a presidential forum hosted at Warren's Saddleback Church Aug. 16, 2008.

"Look, I got two daughters- 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."- Obama campaigning in Johnstown, Pa., March 29, 2008

This is a man whose moral judgement to represent the United States is questionable. His character flaw is something we cannot truly accept as a society that believes in life, liberty, and the pursuit toward happiness.

So, in November, please do not allow temptation to select Barack Obama because he utterly disregards the sanctity of life, and also, he is not an American citizen base on a recent court ruling.

Obama Pelosi and Reid Will Give Us a Fascist Government

The term fascist is define "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition."

Now, I feel there a relationship between this definition and to Obama's policy & ideology.

Can you explain my concerns?

-Why Obama has called for a national police at least as strong as the military?
-Why Obama’s supporters have personally trashed anyone and destroy individual lives who criticizes their candidate, including the media?
-Why has anybody disputed Freddie/Fannie’s role in our economic crisis, which Obama had a direct role?
-Why is Obama’s relationships with unrepentent domestic terrorists of no consequence but Sarah Palin’s husband belonging to the Alaska Independence Party is big news?
-Why did Obama told his supporters to get in our faces to intimidate us in order to get us to vote for him?
-Why would Obama gave ACORN $800,000 of his campaign funds to “Get out the vote”, in spite of the fact ACORN has been under scrutiny for a number of years for voter registration fraud?
-Why did Obama vows to change the world?
-Why did Obama vows to remake America?

You can call it Fascism, Socialism, or Communism, but we can agree that it's not what our founding fathers intended this country to follow.

To see the Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and House would be a horrible thought. I will assure you that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid will destroy America. When you have a one party system controlling both branches of government, it has been proven it will cause more corruption and misdeeds.

Unlike other Administrations, an Obama presidency with the most left leaning Liberals controlling both chambers of Congess will be destructive to every living American.

Don't let Barack Obama win, let him steal it because he is not an American citizen. Lol!

Thursday, October 23, 2008

The October Surprise is that Obama is NOT an American Citizen

I have been following a story since August about rumors flourishing around Obama's status of citizenship of the United States. I thought of it being a joke, but I was reading to damning evidence that Barack Obama may not be a citizen of the United States.

There is a Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg, who filed a lawsuit demanding Sen. Barack Obama present proof of his American citizenship. Before you say that he is a Republican hack, Berg is a prominent laywer and a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who is also a die-hard Democrat.

Phillip Berg filed suit in U.S. District Court in August, alleging that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and is thus ineligible to serve as president of the United States. The lawsuit is simple. Obama has to answer to the charges and dispute them, or base on legal procedures, he defaults and accepts the accusation.

This is called Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that unless the accused party provides written answer or objection to charges within 30 days, the accused legally admits the matter.

Therefore, if Obama doesn't respond in 30 days, which was October 15, 2008, he legally admitted to the lawsuit's accusations, including the charge that the Democratic presidential candidate was born in Mombosa, Kenya, registering in the state of Hawaii four days after his birth, lying about his place of birth, faking his birth certificate, fraudulently running for office and accusing the DNC for not properly vetting its candidate.

Wouldn't it be easy to produce a birth certificate? Even though Obama has posted an image of a Hawaii birth certificate online, I really question of its authenticity. It looks fake to me. What Berg is asking is that the court verify the birth certificate, which the Obama campaign has not provided.

The only peep from Obama came with a filed motions to dismiss, but he has not actually answered the charges in the lawsuit. According to the Rule 36, Obama has legally admitted he is not a natural-born citizen.

Berg is a smart cookie. He was able to cover all base to prevent his lawsuit from falling apart. Berg filed a Requests for Admissions on Sept. 15, 2008, meaning Obama had until Oct. 15 to answer or accept the consequences of Rule 36.

And since the deadline has past, Berg made a public statement. He said, "Obama and the DNC admitted, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is not qualified to be president and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for president and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate."

Recently, Berg filed two additional motions at the district court in Philadelphia. The first asks the court to notify Obama and the DNC that they have now legally admitted to the charges, and the second asks for an expedited ruling before the Nov. 4 election.

Base on "Fight the Smears" section of Obama's website, it states:

"Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn't have a birth certificate aren't actually about that piece of paper. They're about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen. The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America." The website provides an images of a Hawaii birth certificate bearing the name Barack Hussein Obama II, which is highly questionable.

The irony about this is based on the fact that no media outlet nor the Obama machine are willing to challenge Berg's accusations. That itself gives merit that Obama doesn't want this to become an issue just weeks before the general election.

By not voicing the lawsuit, Obama has admitted to everything. Therefore, Obama admits he was born in Kenya. Obama admits he was adopted in Indonesia. The birth certificate posted online is a phony. And he admits that he is constitutionally ineligible to run for president of the United States.

I wonder if this is the October surprise that Obama was concerned about.

What say you?

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Statement of Speading the Wealth Will Haunt Obama for a Long Long Time

Barack Obama had to make a public announcement and do some damage control on behalf of Joe Biden controversial remarks. Obama knew that Biden is a loaded gun waiting to go off, but he needs Biden and Colin Powell to make up his short-coming in foreign policy. So, this press conference was to clarify what Biden said at a private fundraiser and to defuse "Joe the Plumber" popularity.

Obama is going to have a hell of a time explaining his Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden prediction that within 6 months of an Obama's presidency, an international crisis WILL happen.

Obama said, "Joe sometimes engages in rhetorical flourishes, but his core point is that the next administration is going to be tested regardless of who it is because of the fact the next administration is inheriting a whole host of really big problems."

I think Obama made himself looking weak with his lame excuse for Biden and the headaches of "Joe the Plumber." Like Biden, Barack Obama has a tendency to flap his mouth to try to sound important. I think the lasting impression that will stick to Obama is his infamous line to "Joe the Plumber." In the exchange, Obama said, "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

Obama told reporters that his tax plan doesn't spread wealth, but does involve spreading around opportunity. He also said that it does mean people like myself making more than $250,000 will pay a little bit more.

After the press conference, a conservative pundit said, "Obama believes that raising taxes to spread the wealth will create opportunity. If Obama does not prescribe to socialism, then what economic theory does he follow? Obama apparently believes government creates jobs, which is why he wants to raise taxes on hard-working Joes."

I call it the beginning of Communism.

Did You Hear an Obama Supporter Attacking a McCain Supporter?

I always believe Liberals are unhinged. The ignorance of Liberals are the cause of their frustration, which leads to their violence. I found this report in the internet about a McCain supporter being attacked by an idiot Obama supporter.

This occurred on a Monday afternoon, September 15, 2008, when three McCain volunteers were holding campaign signs and distributing leaflets on a busy corner of 51st Street and Lexington Avenue in New York City. As these McCain workers were doing their job peacefully, they were approached by a man who, ripped a McCain sign out of the hands from one of a McCain supporter and beat her in the face with the wooden stick to which the sign was attached.

The District Attorney of New York has indicted the Obama supporter. In the indictment briefing, the complaint reads, “Defendant grabbed the sign [informant] was holding, broke the wood stick that was attached to it, and then struck informant in informant’s face thereby causing informant to sustain redness, swelling, and bruising to informant’s face and further causing informant to sustain substantial pain.”

And do you know who is this victim? The victim is a small middle-aged woman. So, a grown man, who cannot comprehend nor articulate any of Obamas issues, had to resort to his Liberal instinct and beat up an innocent women. Now, that shows some manhood.

Throughout this whole incident, my question is, "where the hell was the media?" This is worth reporting than finding out that "Joe the Plumber" had a tax lien. If it took the media less than 24 hrs to find dirt on "Joe the Plumber" and Sarah Palin, why are they so late in reporting on Jerimiah Wright, Frank Raines, and now this?

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Obama Tax Plan Will Screw the American Worker and the Senior Citizen

I enjoy taking to Liberals who have no idea what they are talking about. My encounter with one at work ended with educating the individual with concrete facts. The problem is that these liberals don't understand the issues. It is confusing when the candidates repeat the same rhetoric without clarification. But breaking down the issues to the simpliest form, one can easily understand their rhetoric.

In regards to Obama's tax cut to 95% of working American, he is really referring to a refundable tax credit going to the 44% of working Americans who don't pay income tax.

Whether you make less than $250,000 a year or more, I can guarantee that Obama’s plan will actually increase taxes on the vast majority of Americans. And these taxes will be guised as a refundable tax credit.

Now, what Obama hasn't told you is who will pay for these tax credits and who will get screwed the most. To make something refundable, something has to be funded in order that a check can be distributed. Therefore, since tax credits are tied to income, the more you make, the less credits you can earn. In other words, to get a refundable tax credit, more people would be discouraged from earning more, which means no yearly raises and no over-time.

Worse still, millions of Americans who pay no taxes are also entitled to these credits. Thus, people who are paying no taxes at all will still receive a check from the government.

That means 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers would have no income tax liability and they would also get a check from the IRS. According to the Tax Policy Center, the cost of these tax credits would cost the tax payers over $1 trillion in the next 10 years.

Now, ontop of Obama's $1 trillion spending proposal, do you expect the top 5% of the rich to make up for this huge outlay of cash benefit? Yeah, right! So where is this $1 trillion going to come from?

The answer to that question will answer the second part of my premise. The people who will be screwed by this is the working American and the senior citizens collecting Social Security.

Yes, Social Security will be affected. If the idea that these tax credits will benefit to those who work less, then expect a decrease in payroll taxes, which funds Social Security. Get it! Since people are going to get a tax credit refund based on what they pay into Social Security, and to get the refund is to work less, then the tax credit is not about income tax relief, but cutting payroll taxes. The same payroll taxes that fund Social Security. That means it will affect every retiree who collects a Social Security check. The Obama tax credit means billions of dollars in lost revenue for Social Security. Since the Social Security system is already in trouble, this scam will threaten the lives of millions of senior citizens.

To make matters worst, since 90% of small business making less than $250,000 will get tax at the regular income tax rate, and those companies who make over $250,000, who will get a 4% surtax on their payroll tax, then every business at every level will be affected. Therefore, many business would have to cut jobs in order to pay less in payroll tax, which will decrease funds toward Social Security, and would kill this economy.

But according to Obama, “When you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

Monday, October 20, 2008

Biden Warns that an International Crisis WILL Happen if Obama is President

Did you hear what Biden said? 

Democrat Vice-Presidential Biden said on Sunday, "I guaranteed that if Sen. Barack Obama gets elected, he will be tested by an international crisis within his first six months in power and he will need supporters to stand by him as he makes tough, and possibly unpopular, decisions."

Wow! Did he make a revelation about a foreign policy matter? Is Biden forewarning the American people so that we are better prepared? Did a Senate briefing revealed a potential problem in the near future? It's making me wonder.

It seems Biden is guaranteeing trouble under an Obama Administration. Remember, what Biden says should not be taken for granted. He says it would be patriotic to pay higher taxes and that this country is going to face an international crisis or two only if Obama is elected. 

Notice that Biden supports higher taxes and suggested we will not face an international crisis if McCain is elected.  See, under McCain what we would get is lower taxes and apparently a far more peaceful world.  John McCain has been tested and we all know that no one will screw with him, according to Biden. 

It seems when Biden gaffes, he is telling the truth.  Biden says the world is going to test Obama.  What's it going to be, China taking Taiwan?  Iran taking on Israel?  Russia invading Georgia again or the Urkraine?  Israel being wiped off the map?  All the above?  What is it?  Biden's guaranteeing something like this. 

First time in a long time I'm going to agree with Joe Biden.  He's exactly right. We are going to get tested if Obama is president. Man, I love Joe Biden. Thank you so much.

Now, it's your turn. So what's it going to be, people? Don't waste your vote! Do the right thing. This is very real. If you pick a rookie that needs on the job training to be president, then be prepare that our best days are behind us because there is no future for America. 

Not covinced? Biden's historical remark reminds us of past presidential challenges. Remember Jimmy Carter and the Iran Hostage Crisis? Then came Reagan and bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon. As soon Clinton took over, we saw a series of events that tested an unproven and inexperienced leader. In 1993, we saw the first WTC bombing. In 1994, we saw the reality of "Black Hawk down" in Mogadishu. In 1996, we had the Khobar Tower bombing and later we saw the embassy bombing in Kenya-Tazania. To cap Clinton's failure happened in 2000 with the bombing USS Cole. Of course, we cannot forget during Bush '43, we endured the horror of 9/11. So, Biden is using historical facts to anticipate a crisis for someone with no experience in foreign policy taking over the White House.

So, are you ready to take that chance? Are you willing to take that risk?

Sunday, October 19, 2008

The Daily Koz is Right to Call Colin Powell an Uncle Tom

It is official. Retired General Colin Powell is an "Uncle Tom." Hey, don't blame me. Every media out and left-wing bloggers coined it because Powell gave damning evidence that we needed to go into Iraq and he was George Bush's bitch.

Ironically, but not surprise, Powell announced Sunday morning that he endorses Obama. Powell, who was a field soldier during the Vietnam War, is a sub-level general that gained status through the connections he made during the Reagan, Bush '41, and George W. Bush's Administration. I don't mind if Powell endorses Obama, but tell the truth of the reasons why.

Hey, it is a black thing and that's the fact "jack"!

Powell states:

"I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain... McCain has been a good friend for 25 years but I expressed disappointment in the negative tone of McCain's campaign, as well as in his choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as the Republican vice presidential nominee. I don't believe she's ready to be president of the United States."

Well, personally, I find Powell full of crap and a hypocrite. The Daily Koz was right to call him an "Uncle Tom." Powell just showed that his racial preference trumps his political affiliation, which I don't have a problem. I see him as an opportunist and I'm curious what the Obama camp gave Powell to get his endorsement. I want Powell to "fess-up" and say that he supports Obama because of skin color. So far, Powell's reasoning not to support McCain is lame.

I thought military men had a code of honor and respect. Powell and McCain both served in Vietnam. While Powell served as a field soldier and McCain was being tortured in Hanoi Hilton, Obama's buddy Ayers was bombing the Pentagon and the Capitol. While Powell was endorsing the war in Iraq, Obama stood firm against it and later wanted immediate troop withdrawal. If Powell suggested that it's not a black thing, which he is lying, then why did he say it would be energizing to see an African-American in the White House.

I'm perplexed that Obama is boasting that he got a Republican cabinet member to endorse him. The media has been on over drive getting this news out. I say, "big freaking deal." McCain got the endorsement by former vice presidential Democrat candidate Joe Leiberman, but don't expect any mention of it by the dinasuar media.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Get Ready to be Called UNITED STATES of the SOVIET REPUBLIC

In weeks leading to the election, I am hearing more of the political buzz by "Joe" American on the streets. In the old adage, it's rude to talk about religion and politics in any public or private venue, but it seems the current condition of state of this economy is extremely dire that it is the major talk around town.

I will never understand an Obama supporter. Are these individuals not informed and reckless? Do they feel in bad times, throw the candidate of the in party out and put the candidate of the out party in? My concern to their irrational thinking is very simple. Ousting the old party out during the bad times and putting a new party in does not necessarily mean it will improve the situation. How can you improve the situation by putting a Communist ideology in a Democratic society? Are we that stupid?

I hear the comparison that Obama is like Reagan, who himself didn't have the experience to be president, is laughable. At least, Reagan was a governor of a huge state and made executive decisions, compare that with Obama's experience as a community organizer. I would like to remind everybody that putting Obama in the White House would be another Jimmy Carter failure and a Woodrow Wilson's police state. We are already seeing it through Obama's associations being involved in the credit, housing, and financial mess and Obama's thug like mentality to supress those who say negative things about him. Yes, Obama is a thug. For example, Obamas camp got a rude remark by a private citizen when a Obama pollster canvassed a small town in Texas. Well, that family on the following day got a visit by Secret Service accused of death threats to a potential presidential candidate. Wow, I didn't know being rude was a federal offense? Now, that is what we call abusing one's power

If the young college kids come out to vote Obama, I want these young idiots to understand what awaits for them. NO JOBS! Let's see how they will like that. Raising taxes DOES NOT create jobs. It is a job killer. It will be a trickle down effect that will punish all Americans. We DO NOT need government to take care of us and run our lives. Their role should be limited in order that WE can prosper in America.

The notion of spreading the wealth is stupid and unfair. Obama tax "cut", which is a refundable tax credit, plan is to take the money of those fortunate and give it to 43% of those Americans who don't pay taxes. Now, is that fair?

We are going to be a nanny state with big brother watching over us. Get ready America to be called the United States of the Soviet Republic! We will be saying, "Hi, comrade! Please pass the vodka!"

If Obama gets elected, I think we should start learning Russian, or the Obama goons will come after us.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Joe the Plumber Exposes Obama and Obamas Goons Take Revenge

It's pathetic to see the Obama machine, which includes the screwed up mainstream media, go to work right after the last debate. I have never seen the MSM work so hard to find dirt on Joe the Plumber.

I can recall the very same thing when McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate. It took the media less than a day to find dirt on these two individuals than it took to the time to find a blurb on Rev. Wright, Resko, and Ayers.

It seems to be so unfair, but it shows that the American people are not stupid to notice the hypocrisy. I don't understand why Obama and his goons are after Joe the Plumber? It's Obamas fault that he said, "spreading the wealth is good for everybody." To punish Obama stupid comment, the goons go after a private citizen. Just leave the plumber alone. After all, Joe the Plumber isn't running for office; he's just trying to make a living.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

McCain and Obama Roasted Each Other at a Charity Event

At a Alfred E. Smith charity dinner, it is a tradition for the respective presidential candidates to give a humorous speech.

Both McCain and Obama roasted each other, but McCain really gave it to Obama. Mccain is very funny. Obama can only do is laugh, but inside he is saying, "what the hell am I doing here."

Youtube this and enjoy this hysterical event.

Joe Biden Cannot Spell Four Crap

Lol! Senator Joe Biden showed his extreme high IQ by spelling out Obama's priorty to the American people.

Biden says that Obama is interested in helping all Americans and it's 3 letters "J-O-B-S".

Wow! Biden is a figgin idiot. It shows that going to an ivy league school does not make anyone more intelligent.

This is a guy who is a heart beat to the presidency. Biden is another JACKASS!

Its Time to Oust that Jackass John Murtha

If Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha did a disservice to his office, he did it yesterday and he did it to his own constituents.

Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha gave his Republican rival some fresh ammunition Wednesday when he called his own constituents "racist" in an interview with his local newspaper.

Rep. Murtha said that western PA are racist, so don't expect them to vote for a black man. Today, he apologies. When can we say enough is enough. Why are Pennslyvanians giving this 'ass' a pass? Murtha's continuous and overt liable statements stretch way back when he slandered a group of marines in an act of vicious atrocities.

I hope karma brings the justice that this pathetic soul deserves. Murtha sold his soul to the satanic abyss of the Democrat Party.

My advice to Pennsylvania. It's time to vote this jackass out of office and open the ABSCAM file and indict him.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

McCain FINALLY Open a Can of Whoopass!


McCain waited this long to this moment to body slam Obama!


Tuesday, October 14, 2008

An Obama Presidency Intends to End Israel Support

Jessie Jackson, who calls Obama part of the family, gave insight of the intentions of a possible first black president Barack Obama. Jackson, who is an anti-Semite, said the following:

"The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where decades of putting Israel's interests first would end."

Jackson says, "I believes that, although Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House."

Jackson also said, "Obama is about change, and the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Again, Jackson later said, "On Iran, I strongly supports Obama's idea of opening a direct dialogue with the leadership in Tehran. We've got to talk to tell them what we want and hear what they want. Nothing is gained by not talking to others."

Jackson finished his tirade by saying, "Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims. Thanks to his background and ecumenical approach, he knows how Muslims feel while remaining committed to his own faith."

To my Jewish friends, you put Obama in the White House, you can see Israel's exisitence end with a blink of an eye.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Florida Democrat Congressman Using Tax Payer Money to Silence Mistress

Florida Democrat Congressman Using Tax Payer Money to Silence Mistress

We got proof of the circle of corruption in the Democrat party. In the span of many months, we seen Obamas economic advisors, Jimmy Johnson and Frank Raines, having ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Congressman Barney Franks conflict of interest having a male lover with Fannie Mae, Senator Chris Dodd getting sweet mortgage deals and huge payoffs from Fannie Mae, and Congressman Rangel with IRS problems.

To round this off, we have a Democrat Florida congressman seeking to probe himself after being caught in a immoral marital affair.

Today straight from the Associated Press, reporter Brian Skoloff gave this revealing article showing misconduct of a congressman who ran a campaign on ethics and reform. It upsets me to know that two wrongs don't make a right. In this example, Foley was ousted for a non-sexual relationship with a male page, which was wrong, while Mahoney used tax payers money to silence the girl who he had a sexual affair. When will this culture of corruption end? It's non-stop. Please continue to read Skoloff article.

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Democratic U.S. Rep. Tim Mahoney, married with a child, declined to say Monday whether he had carried on an affair with a former aide and paid to keep her quiet, then called for an investigation by the House ethics committee into his own conduct.

Mahoney issued his statement hours after ABC News reported on its Web site that he had agreed to pay $121,000 in March to a former mistress and staff member after being threatened with a sexual harassment lawsuit. Mahoney said he would be vindicated.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also called for an investigation.

The network, citing unnamed current and former Mahoney staff members, said the congressman began his affair with Patricia Allen, 50, in 2006 while he was campaigning for Congress, promising to return morals to Washington.

Mahoney won the race after former Republican U.S. Rep. Mark Foley resigned when it was revealed he sent lurid Internet messages to male teenage pages who had worked on Capitol Hill.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Obama Busted! Admits to Spread the Wealth

Obama Busted! Admits to Spread the Wealth

Category: News and Politics

Obama got busted! The 'messiah' over the weekend was caught in public talking to a group of people. A plumber stated frankly, "you are planning to raise my taxes."

Obama, a Socialist in a Democrat garb, told the plumber that he wants to take those taxes and help those who are less fortunate. Then Robin Hood Wonderboy said to "spread the wealth around." Actually, Obama said, "When you spread the wealth around, everybody wins."

This is wealth redistribution and it's the basic fundamental of Socialism. It is wrong and this form of rhetoric is destructive to this country and the economy.

The wealth belongs to the people who earned it, and the government can't spread it around without first seizing it. Of course seizing that wealth from the high-achievers is something that appeals to a huge number of voters in this country, but taxing the rich who are the businesses that provides jobs and services will only screw the American people

To solve this, we need tax reform. We need the Fair Tax. This will end the corruption of Washington politicians from manipulating the class warfare in getting the votes.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Obamas Tax Cut for 95% of Working Americans is Full of Crap

Obamas Tax Cut for 95% of Working Americans is Full of Crap

With the Dow Jones showing its worst performance in so many years, it doesn't compare to the Carter Administration and the horrific economy of 1980, 1981, and 1982. Double digit inflation, 18% mortgage interest rates, and double digit unemployment was what I could remember during that time and wish never to see it ever again.

All I can say is not to panic. The market will rebound. Don't fall prey with today because the near future will be very promising. I saw how the market rebounded during the 1987 mini market crash and September 11. Just hang in there and don't do anything drastic. We are experiencing the fear factor among the gutless investors in Wall Street. This is an artifical drop, and as fast the market can drop, it will always rebound back past the pre-fall numbers.

I have noticed something that would be worth mentioning. Have you notice when Obama poll number jump higher, the market drops? It is known that over 74% of Wall Street is dreading of an Obama presidency. They know what the economy will be like when we have Pelosi in the House, Reid in the Senate, and Obama in the White House. There wouldn't be any check and balance. You will have Liberals run wild in Washington. As an example, this can be seen with the ineffective Democrat majority, who took over in 2006. They found a way to bring down the price of gas and the barrel of oil. Democrats saw that screwing up the economy will decrease the price of oil and strengthen the dollar. Well, they are right and it just happened. Price of oil dropped below $80 per barrel, and conversely, the dollar strengthened over the Euro. I call it a drastic means, but at the end, the American people still suffer. Ironically, the American people still feel Democrats could do better with the economy than Republicans. ROLMFAO! People! Wake up!

I always insist that raising any taxes during these tough time is foolish and naive. Therefore, i want to point out Obamas plan in cutting taxes for 95% of working families, which is a full of crap, and to restart the economy.

An article by Kimberly Strassel pays tribute to Obama's magic in a column that usefully summarizes the internal contradictions of Obamanism:

To kick off our show tonight, Mr. Obama will give 95% of American working families a tax cut, even though 40% of Americans today don't pay income taxes! How can our star enact such mathemagic? How can he "cut" zero? Abracadabra! It's called a "refundable tax credit." It involves the federal government taking money from those who do pay taxes, and writing checks to those who don't. Yes, yes, in the real world this is known as "welfare," but please try not to ruin the show.

For his next trick, the Great Obama will jumpstart the economy, and he'll do it by raising taxes on the very businesses that are today adrift in a financial tsunami! That will include all those among the top 1% of taxpayers who are in fact small-business owners, and the nation's biggest employers who currently pay some of the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world. Mr. Obama will, with
a flick of his fingers, show them how to create more jobs with less money. It's simple, really. He has a wand.

Just think what we would endure if Obama is president. You don't need to go far and see what the current state the market is doing now. It would take us back to the Jimmy Carter era, but worst.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

What does Bin Laden and Barack Obama have in common?

What does Bin Laden and Barack Obama have in common?

Category: News and Politics

They both have friends who "bombed" the Pentagon. LOL.

Ayers is now the talking point of the week. The media is trying to report on it & put their spin. No matter what Obama say's, he's toast!

McCain put out a tv ad pitting bad judgement & suspected moral character to describe Obama's relationship with Ayers.

For Obama to say Ayers is a neighbor, & was 8 years old when Ayers was committing terrorist act is a joke.

Here is a question to those undecided voters and confused Democrats. Would you befriend someone or allow your child to be near someone you know, who was a pedifile in the past?

I didn't think so.

I am certain that the last debate we will see the gloves coming off, & finally, see some fireworks.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Palin is Related to FDR & Princess Di

Palin is Related to FDR & Princess Di
Category: News and Politics

I always believe that strong genes will pass on through generation to generation. It seems funny that Obama and Cheney share the same family tree. If there are strong similarities between these two men, then it is worth debating.

I am so impress to hear that Sarah Palin has direct lineage to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Britain's Princess Diana.

It has been researched that FDR is a distant cousin of Palin, the Republican vice presidential nominee. According to, Roosevelt is Palin's ninth cousin once removed. Also, Palin is a 8th cousin of the late Princess Diana.

Now we know why Sarah Palin is the darling of most Americans. It's her firery and persuasive personality of a FDR with the elegance and grace of Princess Diana that took America by storm.

A great combination to be a great leader.

Boring Debate but Looking Closely McCain Gave Substance That We Needed

Boring Debate but Looking Closely McCain Gave Substance That We Needed
Current mood: optimistic
Category: News and Politics

Last night debate was very boring, but it showed me that "The One" can be rattled very easily. Besides that, while Obama continue to give the same talking rhetoric from the first debate and his stump talks, McCain took the courage to give his solution to restart the economy.

McCain's fresh idea is to buy up all the bad mortgage and change the term of those loan at the current market price in order to keep those homeowners in their own homes. Instead of Mainstreet bailing out Wallstreet, McCain wants to help rescue Mainstreet, who are the engine of this economy. Whether or not this is a good idea is up to debate, but at least its an idea that we can chew on. Obama did not offer anything new.

I think Obama didn't hurt himself, but he didn't convince those undecided to join his bandwagon. This is why the race remains close.

McCain made a huge jump up from the first debate in that he was more personable and human, serious when he needed to be, but he worked in some humor at several points.

While McCain has been in many townhall forum, I felt embarrassed for Tom Brokaw in reminding Obama to keep his rhetoric within the allowed time limit. If these candidates signed an agreement on the rules of the debate, I expect it to be followed. This is where Obama showed is inexperience. Obama seemed to repeatedly break the rules simply to ramble on past the time limits, even after being indirectly admonished by Brokaw. It seems when McCain struck a nerve, Obama took the liberty to ignore all rules to try and distract the viewer with his charm and grace. At least, I can say that many others saw what I saw and won't be duped by it.

While Obama spent much of the 90 minutes repeating the same phrases and attacks from the first debate, I did enjoy to hear something fresh from McCain. I am sure McCain gave a few conservatives an angina episode with his new idea, but that stood out a little more to keep my interest in the debate.

I thought McCain generally improved his performance on the economic crisis and other domestic matters. He sounded more thoughtful, instead of constantly repeating talking points.

Obama didn’t make any obvious mistakes, except for some makeup lies, but McCain gave undecided voters a slightly improved view than they’ve seen before, while Obama looked pretty much the same. As I said before, this could make a big difference since this race remains to be very close.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

An Damning Email Against Obama from rILEY *pwxk* [God's Warrior]

An Damning Email Against Obama from rILEY *pwxk* [God's Warrior]
Category: News and Politics

I got a email from a myspace friend
'rILEY (pwxk) [God's Warrior]' and it's a fabulous work that took patience and good research. I couldn't said it better myself. I am posting the email he sent to me. Brilliant work Riley!

So i just spent hours compiling this because it's stuff that drives me crazy. Either nobody knows about it, or they just don't care. I'm determined to prove to people just how much of a fool Barry Obama is. Cy, let me know if this sounds good to you! Sadly i can't blog it for some reason! I can't even read your blogs! I'm frustrated! [correction- Riley was able to fix the problem]
And it just get's uglier folks. The wonderboy many of you have picked to save this country will be the one who ruins it from the inside out. Inexperience, wishful thinking, unrealistic, the most liberal senator currently... these are all words that describes Mr. Barry Obama. There's so much most of you don't know about him, and if you knew it you'd refuse to believe it. So here's some facts. Wait let me say that again- FACTS about Barack.
He is pro-choice. He has voted 100% for pro-choice in the past three years EACH time. He doesn't even know when life begins, "This is something that I have not come to a firm resolution on. I think it's very hard to know what that means, when life begins. Is it when a cell separates? Is it when the soul stirs? So I don't presume to know the answer to that question. What I know is that there is something extraordinarily powerful about potential life and that that has a moral weight to it that we take into consideration when we're having these debates." (2008 Democratic Compassion Forum at Messiah College Apr 13, 2008)

Another thing, "In 1997, Obama voted against SB 230, which would have turned doctors into felons by banning so-called partial-birth abortion, & against a 2000 bill banning state funding. Although these bills included an exception to save the life of the mother, they didn't include anything about abortions necessary to protect the health of the mother. The legislation defined a fetus as a person, & could have criminalized virtually all abortion." (The Improbable Quest, by John K. Wilson, p.147-148)

I can't side with someone who wants to allow murdering of children just because it's inconvenient. He said he didn't want his daughters "punished" with a baby if i recall correctly?? And if his daughters DO get pregnant, they would have been able to cross state lines to get an abortion. The law did not pass but was rejected 49/49 with two senators absent. They would also have been protected by law to not have to inform their parents if they decided to have an abortion
William Ayers. He was a figurehead of a group call Weatherman or the Weather Underground. They were a radical left group that aimed at terrorist acts. They bombed a police statue in 1969, bombed new york city's police headquarters in 1970, the U.S. Capitol building in '71, and the Pentagon in '72. He made a bunch of statements about this all on September 10, 2001 and were published the day of the 9/11 attacks. He was quoted as saying "we didn't do enough" and "i don't regret setting bombs." When asked if he would do it again, he said he "didn't want to discount that possibility." And in 2004, he responded to this question, "How do you feel about what you did? Would you do it again under similar circumstances?" His reply: "I’ve thought about this a lot. Being almost 60, it’s impossible to not have lots and lots of regrets about lots and lots of things, but the question of did we do something that was horrendous, awful? ... I don’t think so. I think what we did was to respond to a situation that was unconscionable."

Obama had said that he only knows Ayers. But it's not that simple. He’s appeared on panels with Ayers, Obama served with him as chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (which Ayers co-founded), and held a 1995 campaign event at the home of Ayers and his wife, who was also a member of weather underground. Ayers even gave money to Obama to help his campaign efforts.

Plain and simple, if Obama has a "friendly" relationship with Ayers, as he has said, it makes me a little uncomfortable to know the two have a history together.
You've probably heard about Barack's church and his pastor Jeremiah Wright, who idolizes Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan has referred to Jews and other races as blood suckers and he has referred to Judaism as a dirty or a gutter religion. He also said, "White people are potential humans - they haven't evolved yet," in the Philadelphia Inquirer, March 2000. He also blamed Jews for the War in Iraq, for promoting filth and contolling Hollywood.

What does that have to do with Obama? Wright presented Farrakhan with the "Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award" and said that the man epitomized greatness. Wright even went to Libya with Farrakhan to visit dictator Moammar Khadafy. By the mid-1980s, Khadafy was widely regarded as the principal financier of international terrorism. He funded attacks on a German dance club that killed three and injured 200 (mostly which were U.S. servicemen) and an attack on the '72 olympics that was dubbed "black september movement" in Munich. He even claimed to have a weapons of mass destruction program after we invaded iraq.

He even said this about Obama... "Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency. But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother, who is an American national, made statements that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the Islamic world. We hope that this is merely an elections 'clearance sale,' as they say in Egypt -- in other words, merely an elections lie. As you know, this is the farce of elections -- a person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him, and afterwards, when they say to him: 'You promised this and that,' he says: 'No, this was just elections propaganda.'"

So what i'm getting at is Obama attended this church that's pastor was idolizing islamic radicalist, black liberationists, black power, anti-semantic attitudes if you will, for over 20 years. That would be like me attending a church that's pastor finds the company of klan mambers and neo-nazis to be enjoyable. Barack even told Wright that he preferred him not to come to his campaign announcement because he could "get kind of rough at sermons." and then Khadafy says that Obama is a Muslim, but he lied about it. Hoping that when he wins, Obama will tell the truth. I'm not sure this guilty by association thing should be ignored.
Obama's foreign policy experience is next to nothing! By thinking we can sit down and convince Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to be nice to Israel or to take back the statement that "the countdown to the destruction of the U.S. has begun," is crazy. If he doesn't believe the holocaust happened or that we were attacked on 9/11, how is Barry Obama gonna convince him to allow israel it's right to exist where it is now?

(Ahmadinejad said that the only thing that happened on 9/11 was a building collapsed and the death toll was never published, nor any victim's names. He also stated, "I will only accept something as truth if I am actually convinced of it," referring to the holocaust.)

Obama doesn't have the ideology to address these situations! The Washington Post reported, “European officials are increasingly concerned that Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign pledge to begin direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program without preconditions could potentially rupture U.S. relations with key European allies early in a potential Obama administration.” So Obama is gonna screw us over on that issue.
Obama wants to go back to the policies of pre 9/11 by granting habeas corpus to terrorists captured. He is against detaining them for long periods of time. That would put us back to the 1990's when the USS Cole was attacked and our embassies were bombed in Africa. We haven't been attacked since 9/11 and neither has a place of American interest since 2004! Something must be working, but he thinks that our policy of detainment will just make more people mad and think we dislike muslims. Obamas interest is obviously in what other people think of us and not what is best for us.
This is just the start of my arguments against Barack Obama. I can provide more reasons later. It's 5 a.m.
I think it's bed time!

http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Bill_ayers
http://www. usnews. com/blogs/barone/2008/09/24/mainstream-media-should-pay-attention-to-obamas-ties-to-william-ayers. html
http://americanpowerblog. blogspot. com/2008/04/obamas-ties-to-ayers-and-dohrn-arent. html
http://www. denverpost. com/harsanyi/ci_8440768
http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Louis_Farrakhan
http://www. adl. org/special_reports/farrakhan_own_words2/farrakhan_own_words. asp
http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Muammar_al-Gaddafi
http://www. rushlimbaugh. com/home/daily/site_090908/content/01125108. guest. html
http://www. ontheissues. org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion. htm

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Obama Spreading Lies That Bailout Profits Will Go to the American People

Obama Spreading Lies That Bailout Profits Will Go to the American People
Category: News and Politics

I read the bailout bill that was sign by the Senate, the House, and by President Bush. My opinion of it is "Bullcrap!"

Beside the billions of pork or earmarks hidden inside the bill, I kept hearing that the profits of this bailout will come back to us the American people.

Even the false 'messiah' is out there speading these lies. Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) statement on the Senate floor that “every penny” of the profits derived from the government’s purchase and resale of troubled mortgage-backed securities “will go directly back to the American people.”

To quote, Obama said, “If this is managed correctly, and that is an important ‘if,’ we will hopefully get most of our money back, and possibly even turn a profit on the government's investment -- every penny of which will go directly back to the American people.”

The truth is that the law says the money will go to pay off federal debt.

Therefore, what Obama and the majority members of the House and Senate, who supported this bill, their claim that the money will go to the American people is false.

In reality, the bill states that the government will get all of its money back. I do not see anywhere that any profit will be returned directly to taxpayers.

The bill states:

Under Section 106(d) of the bill, entitled “Transfer to the Treasury,” “(all) revenues of, and proceeds from the sale of troubled assets purchased under this Act . . . shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury for reduction of the public debt.”

This means if any money realized by this bailout would go directly into the federal treasury.

This bailout may help free money for banks to lend to another and be able to give out loans to the American people, but who says that the bank has to do it. We are fixing the problem and rewarding bad behavior by throwing money on it.

Heck, this is the Democrats way of fixing any problem. I can't wait to see if the Speaker of the House from California will bailout its financial woes of her own State

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Biden Talks Stupid During The VP Debate

Biden Talks Stupid During The VP Debate
Category: News and Politics

From the debate, Biden not only wouldn't shut up, he started to spew idiotic lies and misinformation. I start to notice when he enjoyed throwing out unrealistic facts and figures out of thin air. Did you notice some of the following that was so obvious to me?

* Biden said, "It's simply not true that Barack Obama said he'd meet Iran's president without preconditions."

Yet when Obama was asked if he would in a debate during the primaries, he said yes. Even Biden back then called Obamas remark "naive."

* Biden said during the debate he's "always supported" clean-coal technology, but after stammering emphatically just last month, "I do not support clean coal."

* Biden repeatedly asserted that the US spends more money on three weeks' combat in Iraq than it's spent in Afghanistan since the war began.

Well, that claim's maybe true if he limits Afghan expenditures merely to US rebuilding efforts. But according to State Department numbers, Joe Blow - would been off by a factor of three.

* Biden repeatedly insisted that "our commanding general in Afghanistan said the surge principle in Iraq will not work."

Actually, Sarah Palin corrected Biden's dangerous statement by saying, "What Gen. David McKiernan had said was that tribal realities in Afghanistan are very different than in Iraq, which requirie a different form of cooperation of more troops and local tribal support." In other words, Biden and Obama supports an Afghanistan surge. The same SURGE in Iraq that Biden and Obama opposes.

* Then there was the classic Bidens "WTF??" moment. Biden said,
"When . . . along with France, we kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and Barack said, 'Move NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don't, Hezbollah will control it."

Huh? What the hell??

A friend of mine helped with with this one. Alfonzo said that Biden was referring to 2005,when American and French gave pressure to help the Lebanese people kick Syrian troops out of Lebanon. NATO never occupied in that deeply divided country as if America's NATO allies would have gone in the first place. But hey, it wouldn't be a Biden moment to opine and bloviate into a 5 minute leture.

You gotta love Biden, who is just a heart beat away to the White House. OMG, that is a scary thought. LOL.