Thursday, June 9, 2011

If Killing Camels Will Help Global Warming, Can We Kill a Liberal



The stupidity among Liberals are astounding. It has been proven that global warming is a hoax. It seems the government is the only entity who thinks otherwise. Since there are more humans than camels, I have a wonderful ideal. To support the absurdity, instead of killing camels, why can't we kill Liberals instead? Since Liberals produce more manure than camels, it is only logical to get rid of a group that produces more methane equivalent to one ton of carbon dioxide a year.

(Breitbart) Australia is considering awarding carbon credits for killing feral camels as a way to tackle climate change.

The suggestion is included in Canberra's "Carbon Farming Initiative", a consultation paper by the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, seen Thursday.

Adelaide-based Northwest Carbon, a commercial company, proposed culling some 1.2 million wild camels that roam the Outback, the legacy of herds introduced to help early settlers in the 19th century.

Considered a pest due to the damage they do to vegetation, a camel produces, on average, a methane equivalent to one tonne of carbon dioxide a year, making them collectively one of Australia's major emitters of greenhouse gases.

In its plan, Northwest said it would shoot them from helicopters or muster them and send them to an abattoir for either human or pet consumption.