Saturday, November 29, 2008

What Great Depression

I can recall the messiah's provoking words, "We only have one president at a time." But failed to mention, "But at the same time we can't hide." The audacity emanating from the Obama camp beginning to move into the Oval Office before the present president moves out. Is this the Chicago-thug "lets evict everybody" mentality? Giving these "fireside" news conferences, empty radio speeches, and teasing America of his cabinet picks is a bit of a stretch. I would think this is unprecedented for a man with no experience and arrogance that would top Donald Trump. Though, I am impress that the Bush Administration finds all of it very amusing. Bush could easily snipe, mock, or undermine Obama's transitions with a snap of a finger, but will not. I think Bush realize that Obama will undo his credibility when he enters office on Jan. 20, 2009. Why spoil his folly now?

You may ask, "What folly?" If you had listen to Obama speak, he always refers the current state of the economy as the worst economic environment since the Great Depression. It is the most over exaggerated misnomer for someone so inadequate to run this country. There may be a few of us out there who remembers the Great Depression, but honestly, we are not in one. To hear the media use the words "crisis", "meltdown", and "cataclysm" to "we are in a Great Depression", "million of job will be lost", and "we will never get out of it", I can only imagine if such diatribes were really true. We are not in a classical definition of a Great Depression. No one talks about 15 millions of jobs being created, but instead, they talk about a million jobs lost. No one talks about the gains in the stock markets over a period of 25 years, but yet, these same people are disheveled of temporary drop in the market this year alone. The only person to blame is you. The recession that many of you classify yourself is your own doing. No one told you to flip houses, take out a home equity loan for those extravagant trips, amass a huge credit card bill, and make bad financial decision. That is your fault. Where is self responsibility of our own destiny? There is your Great Depression and now, you are finding ways to get out it. There are consequences we choose in life that will either reward us or punish us. Jumping on the bandwagon, giving in to your selfish needs, and catching up with the "Jones" are recipes for disaster.

The problems we have are fixable. I do not need to tell you how. It is your duty as a responsible intelligent human being to fix it yourself.

But the problem that the media bombards us on a daily basis with negativity, death, and sorrow, we tend to forget to walk outside and see that everything looks the same. Nothing changes. I see my neighbors shopping, dressed the same, still packing a few extra pound, and look at ease as they did years ago during a very good economy. You do the same and you will come to the same conclusion.

You don't want to jinks yourself and claiming we are living in a Great Depression. That is unfounded. Look at the pictures during the time of the Great Depression and it is much of a catastrophe than it is today. No jobs, no food, and no fun. The Great Depression last over 12 years and it took WWII to get us out of it. In fact, back then, there are no safety nets or meaningful regulations to protect us from a certain fall. Now, we have unemployment benefits, food stamps, and welfare to keep those affected to stay afloat. Even though all these programs are very expensive, there is some avenue of relief to prevent further dismay. This Great Depression ideology by the mainstream media has affected many households throughout America. From there, the word is spread by wildfire. Consumer confidence drops, worrying about layoffs, and having to eat "SPAM" are contributing factors to be in a Great Depression in the eyes of the worried consumer. I say hogwash! Just go outside and see it for yourself. Perception is not reality. I feel sorry for those who made bad decisions that got themselves into a downward spiral, but changing a certain habit or lifestyle will get them out of the rut.

So, before getting depress, just know that there is always someone out there who is in worst shape than you. Before worrying about people you don't know, it's important to concentrate getting out your own rut. As soon as more and more people are getting back on their feet, we will get out of this Great Depression mentality. You know who really wants to see this Great Depression to continue. It's the politician that runs Washington. The more miserable we are, the better control they have over us.

Black Friday May Be Dangerous to Your Health

What have we become? This society has gone to the dogs. The Media proliferation of sex, drugs, homosexuality, deceit, and many immoral issues has sweep throughout America. We have lost our sense of common sense and our consistent complacency has destroyed the essential fundamental foundation that this country was founded on. No more having a parent taking care of the child when there is television, computers, and video games. No more exposing a child about complexities of life, but instead keeping them in a bubble from the outside world never letting them grow up. No more disciplining a child when it is frown upon by society and the fear of government intervention.

I have talked about this many months ago. Comparing from last year, I see a continual degradation of the family. I see spousal murder, spousal abuse, child abuse, children killing children, children killing adults, and children killing parents as the norm. What is wrong with this picture? A civil-minded individual would be horrid by the fact that we are being more selfish of our own needs and forgetting the needs of others. It doesn't help much when the fuel of the fire is bombarded on a daily basis by what the media feeds us.

Hence, yesterday was Black Friday. It is shopping season galore. The minute feeling of a hint of a recession has been temporarily forgotten since it is the festive season of love, reflection, and giving. I just came back from the mall yesterday to see, for my curiosity, the comparison between what the media calls a recession and how packed were the parking lots. I can say it is a good sign to see people go shopping. In this artificial economic downturn, people are shopping wisely than carefree, but I would never guess to see people acting like idiots. It is insane to see the behavior of a person when they see the word "sale." It is like a once in a lifetime opportunity soon to be lost forever when the supply is exhausted. Some people call it a tradition. I call it stupidity. To the more observant individual, these absurd “sales” only tell us that the actual price of the product is far cheaper than what it actually states.

But it doesn't remove the fact that these absurd "sales" should cause people to act like animals. Yesterday, there are news reports of fighting, shooting, and a horrifying death by stampede. When you have a gun fight at Toys R Us leading toward two deaths, wouldn’t you say that things are getting out of hand? When you have a temporary store clerk being trampled to death by a mob of thousands stampeding into Wal-Mart to get that $300.00 laptop, I think we need to take a step back and relax. When you have people physically yelling and fighting for a discounted 40% off Play Station system, I hope little Billy at home really appreciated the gift that his parents fought tooth and nail to get it.

This is what I call an embarrassment. This is what I call Liberalism. It’s losing ones individual responsibility with all rule of order thrown out the window.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

This Thanksgiving I Learned Something

In this moment while we celebrate Thanksgiving, we should be thankful we are alive and be counting our blessings. While we are floundering and moping because of a minor temporary economy meltdown, we are reminded that life is more precious and usually taken for granted.

This event of terrorism in India should be a reminder that there is something more important than our own self interest. This economy will survive, I promise. But when a life is taken away because of terrorism, we are handicapped physically and emotionally, which will have a direct impact to this economy and national security.

Just realize this. We put ourselves in peril when we voted in an inexperience fool who will help the terrorist to achieve their goal and decimate our will as Americans. Just remember, to keep this world safe from terrorism will impact the economy and our emotional well being in a positive way.

It's not the economy. The economy has no direct relationship to terrorism. It is national security that has a direct role to our economy. While mostly everybody have been thinking micro, a few of us were thinking macro. Only a minority of us sees beyond our self interest, and therefore will overcome the headaches and suffering that everybody is bitching about. We must not panic, we need to voice your concerns, we must prepare for the long term, and we must stop Obama from making it even worst.

Obama Will Take Care of India and Save the World

President-elect Barack Obama and UN chief Ban Ki-Moon led the global community condemnation of the terror attacks in Mumbai, India and called on the nations of the world to work together to root out and destroy terrorist networks. Big mistake! Just watch for the next 4 years how the United Nations and the Barack Obama will screw up our national security. It will be a huge blunder to get the UN involved. They are the most corrupt pansy-ass outfit of an organization, in which the US waste millions upon million of taxpayers dollars to keep it running.

Since the State Department said there were no known American casualties in the attacks, Indian television reported that Western hostages were being held in two five-star hotels where gunmen had carried out coordinated strikes.

More than 300 were also wounded in the highly coordinated attacks Wednesday night by bands of gunmen who invaded two five star hotels, a popular restaurant, a crowded train station, a Jewish center and at least five other sites, armed with assault rifles, hand grenades and explosives. The gunmen appeared to be holed up inside all three buildings on Thursday holding foreign and local hostages. Among those foreigners held captive were Americans, British, Italians, Swedes, Canadians, Yemenis, New Zealanders, Spaniards, Turks, a Singaporean and Israelis. It seems the terrorists appeared to have been targeting Britons and Americans. Base on Indian media reports, an unknown group calling itself the Deccan Mujahedeen claimed responsibility for the attacks.

Joe Biden was right after all. As predicted, it was less than 6 months before an international crisis will occur. I hope this will scare the living “bejesus” in Obama and realize that holding the highest office of the presidency does not lend to on the job training. National security and keeping the economy strong is the two top priorities the president is ultimately responsible. And it seems ironic we got an elected inexperience person to take charge of this country (Obama), who is clueless on foreign policy affairs and partly responsible for the economic debacle (Fannie Mae). It is funny how things come in full circle. Let's say that the horror seen in India is just a small preview of what will be in stored for the Obama Administration on Jan. 20, 2009. The smartest thing wonderboy has done is keeping Gates as Secretary of Defense. At least Obama realizes that putting any of his bozo Democrat friends as Secretary of Defense will compromise his bid for the 2012 elections. Yes, he is already looking that far in the future. Honestly, putting Gates in charge won't help any because Obama will weaken the infrastructure that will compromise everything.

I'm starting to notice that there some activity brewing in Afghanistan, Iran, Russia, and now, India. It seems Obama will have his hands full by the time he is become president on Jan 20. I hope the messiah is not over his head. Obama did say he will cast his hands and heal the world. Let's see it, wonderboy!

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

The Real Story of Thanksgiving (Rush Limbaugh)

The Real Story of Thanksgiving (Rush Limbaugh)
Rush November 21, 2006

By Rush Limbaugh

RUSH: Okay, time for the real story of Thanksgiving. I want to precede this by sharing with you -- and I want to bounce off of our last call, Suzie. Sometimes she has trouble being optimistic. Now, I don't know that this would qualify as something about which you can run around and feel really optimistic about. Something struck me the other day. (It strikes me a lot, by the way.) I went to a dinner party on Friday night, and it was a buffet here where I live before I had to go over to the Breakers Hotel and introduce Ann Coulter and give her an award for David Horowitz's Restoration Weekend. There were a lot of people at this bash, and walking through the buffet and looking at all of the food, the shrimp, all the vegetables and everything, the desserts, it just struck me.

[]I started flashing back to my trip to Afghanistan. I saw some of the most unbelievable human living conditions I have ever seen, and I can tell you for a fact that the number of average Afghanis who eat food in the way we take for granted is just astoundingly high. We hear all day long pessimistic stories about shortages of this or that, we're going to deplete the oceans of all edible fish in 30 years or whatever the hell stupid notion it was, and we've been hearing these kinds of stories for years, that we're destroying species. It always amazes me when I actually stop to think about it. Just visit a grocery store. Imagine how many grocery stores there are in this country. Look at the food production in this country alone, and look at the relative cheap price that food is in grocery stores.

You can find high priced items in there, but bare essentials, market basket prices. People have to eat. There's not a whole lot of room for price gouging there unless you go to gourmet places and that kind of thing, but even at that, they're available, if you want it. The amount of food that is produced in this country, the plenty of it, is astounding, when you stop to think that wherever you are, in your one grocery store or at your restaurant when you're having dinner, imagine millions of such places, with the same stuff, and then put it all in somebody's home, where they're having Thanksgiving or what have you, or in restaurants or whatever, it's just astounding to me. The ability of the earth to produce and provide all this, against all these predictions that we're going to starve or going to have a famine, that the population explosion is going to wipe out all of these luxuries and opportunities.

It's just... I don't know. Sometimes it just blows me away, because I don't have anything to do with producing it. There are people that do, and I'm just in awe. When you asked me why I am optimistic and so forth, it's because I am in awe of the country.

Compared to the rest of the world and compared to the attacks that we endure and even our own internal bottles of people in this country that hate this country, still look at it, look at it, if you want just from the bare essentials. Look at how many automobiles there are in a used car lot, look at how many automobiles there are in junkyards. Those are the cars in junkyards that are being driven around in places like Afghanistan or Cuba, anywhere else.

We're just spoiled I think in so many areas that just the basics are often so taken for granted that their value in what they represent is overlooked on occasion.

We can even satisfy oddballs that don't want to eat meat or who don't want to eat fish, whatever your culinary peculiarities are, somebody's out there making sure that you can get what you want, even with all the assaults on the food business that there have been.

Anyway, leads me to the real story of Thanksgiving as written by me in my book "See, I Told You So!" We're on Chapter Six here: "Dead White Guys or What Your History Books Never Told You," page 70.

On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs.

Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work.

"But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness," destined to become the home of the Kennedy family. "There were no friends to greet them, he wrote. There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning.

During the first winter, half the Pilgrims – including Bradford's own wife – died of either starvation, sickness or exposure.

"When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats." Yes, it was Indians that taught the white man how to skin beasts. "Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper! This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. "Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives, rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments.

Here is the part [of Thanksgiving] that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share.

"All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well. Nobody owned anything. They just had a share in it. It was a commune, folks. It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California – and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way.

Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives.

He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage, thus turning loose the power of the marketplace.

"That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened?

It didn't work! Surprise, surprise, huh?

What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation!

But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years – trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it – the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently.

What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future.

"'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years...that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing – as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote. 'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.'

Why should you work for other people when you can't work for yourself? What's the point?

"Do you hear what he was saying, ladies and gentlemen? The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property.

Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result?

'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'

Bradford doesn't sound like much of a... liberal Democrat, "does he? Is it possible that supply-side economics could have existed before the 1980s? Yes.

"Read the story of Joseph and Pharaoh in Genesis 41. Following Joseph's suggestion (Gen 41:34), Pharaoh reduced the tax on Egyptians to 20% during the 'seven years of plenty' and the 'Earth brought forth in heaps.' (Gen. 41:47)

In no time, the Pilgrims found they had more food than they could eat themselves.... So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians. The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London.

And the success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans and began what came to be known as the 'Great Puritan Migration.'"

Now, other than on this program every year, have you heard this story before? Is this lesson being taught to your kids today -- and if it isn't, why not? Can you think of a more important lesson one could derive from the pilgrim experience?

So in essence there was, thanks to the Indians, because they taught us how to skin beavers and how to plant corn when we arrived, but the real Thanksgiving was thanking the Lord for guidance and plenty -- and once they reformed their system and got rid of the communal bottle and started what was essentially free market capitalism, they produced more than they could possibly consume, and they invited the Indians to dinner, and voila, we got Thanksgiving, and that's what it was: inviting the Indians to dinner and giving thanks for all the plenty is the true story of Thanksgiving.

The last two-thirds of this story simply are not told.

Now, I was just talking about the plenty of this country and how I'm awed by it. You can go to places where there are famines, and we usually get the story, "Well, look it, there are deserts, well, look it, Africa, I mean there's no water and nothing but sand and so forth."

It's not the answer, folks. Those people don't have a prayer because they have no incentive. They live under tyrannical dictatorships and governments.

The problem with the world is not too few resources. The problem with the world is an insufficient distribution of capitalism.


Obama Whines Because His Blackberry Will Be Taken Away

The hypocrites who attacked Sarah Palin for keeping a personal Yahoo! email account aren't making a fuss about Obama wanting to keep his precious Blackberry. I really wonder what is so important for Obama to keep his personal Blackberry. It is a national security risk to keep connected to people outside his immediate White House circle. I can't believe he is whining to keep his cell phone. The audacity of the messiah to do something that no president in the history of the White House is able to do.

I know that he won't have a direct line to his friends back in Chicago, but I know that Bill Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, George Soros, Tony Resko, Jeremiah Wright, and Louis Farrakhan will have an open door policy to the White House. So, what is the big deal?

But get this! You know what Obama said why he needs a personal Blackberry? He said that he was concerned that the isolated life of a president would limit his access to information from outside the bubble of the White House. It seems so obvious to the layman why it would be important to restrict Obama on his personal Blackberry use. For one thing, it is a national security issue because the president is limited in his electronic correspondences for fear of hacking. Additionally, presidential communications are strictly monitored and archived for historical purposes.

Obama stated, “One of the things that I’m going to have to work through is how to break through the isolation — the bubble that exists around the president. I’m in the process of negotiating with the Secret Service, with lawyers, with White House staff … to figure out how can I get information from outside of the 10 or 12 people who surround my office in the White House.”

Who the hell does are those 10 to 12 people outside the White House that he needs contact besides his radical associates? Is there something the messiah would like to share to the American public?

If he wants to contact his illegal aunt or his half brother, I think Obama can make an arrangement? Well, he is the messiah, I mean, president. For goodness sakes, it is only a cell phone. Obama, we will get you another nice new black cell phone you can use. Don't cry.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Colmes Breaking Up With Hannity at Fox! Good Ridden

My only source for news 24/7 is FOX News Channel (FNC). It is the only fair and balance 24-hour general news service covering breaking news as well as political, entertainment and business news.

It was announced on Monday that longtime talk show duo Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes will be parting at the end of the year. Hannity will remain in his current spot but Colmes will be moving on to other programs at the network.

The press release issued Monday by FOX News Channel’s (FNC):

Alan Colmes will relinquish his role as co-host of Hannity & Colmes at the end of the year. Colmes will continue to have a presence on FNC as he will serve as a liberal commentator on a variety of FOX News programming, including’s The Strategy Room and continue hosting his radio program, The Alan Colmes Show on FOX Talk, a division of FOX News Radio. He will also begin developing a weekend program.

Since the show has ran for 12 years, it catapulted to number one in 2003 and never relinquishing the top spot. It is the second highest-rated program in cable news behind only The O’Reilly Factor.

But as Conservative talk radio thrived for decades, so too will Conservative TV programs. Colmes had no chance and portrayed very weak against Hannity. Colmes talking points were minute and twisting a context to expedite his rhetoric. It was pathetic to watch him debate with Hannity and their guest.

Honestly, I'm glad Colmes is out. Now, we will see a true Conservative attack his Liberal guest without stupid comments from Colmes. That what we need. It will allow Hannity more time to divest his questions in depth to scrutinize these idiotic Liberals, who have the gut to go on the show.

I am hedging that the Hannity Show will produce a larger viewing audience since we no longer have to hear the lunacy of Alan Colmes. Good ridden!

Obama a House Negro? Yeah? and.....

I need to interject the obvious stupidity of the month. This past week was abuzz with the news that Al-Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al Zawahri called President-elect Barak Obama a House Negro, a racially-charged term used by 1960s black American Muslim leader Malcolm X to describe black slaves loyal to white masters. I'm just impress that Al Zawahri knows anything about American Black History. I'm not perturb that an Al-Qaeda leader called Obama a "House Negro," but I'm annoyed by those hypersensitive morons who literally took the comment as an outrage.

Please get a life. To call him a "House Negro" would be missing the entire point of just who a "House Negro" is, and what he represents. Throughout the blogosphere, I read the protest like America overcame the evils of slavery, we still struggle with racism, but our system grants equal rights to people of all color, and Obama is a product of that struggle and an example of just how equal we are. Yada, yada, yada.

These Liberals and crazy Democrats must have forgotten their tirade using this racial epithet when they called Secretary of State Colin Powell a "House Negro" and when they called Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a "House Negro" and "Aunt Jemima?" I guess the Liberals had an absentminded moment. Hey, Al Sharpton publicly suggest that Powell and Rice as "House Negro". Does that make it right for anybody to call these racial epithet? It is yes or no and not maybe.

So before we get all outraged, let's remember this:
Al-Qaeda has murdered 3,000 Americans inside of 45 minutes to an hour-and-a-half; they have beheaded American journalists and a American citizen; they have committed all kinds of atrocities all over the world.  And now the American left (MSM and Al Sharpton particularly) is finally upset at Al-Qaeda dare to say something racist!  The Liberals turned a blind eye and allowed Al-Qaeda to kill whoever they want, and whenever they want. In return, Liberals will do their best to understand them, but when these enemies of the United States start using racist language, this is when Liberals put their foot down!  The media has toned down and even condone the actions of our enemy. From condemnation of Club Gitmo to showing sympathy of a child murderer, it reminds me that this society doesn't have their priorities in the right order.

Obama may be a "House Negro" not in the literal sense, but what else is new. Obama will be a puppet with a symbolic stature. The Democrat Majority and the special interest group that got Obama the White House will set his agenda to follow. Let's agree that Obama is the most Liberal Senator based on his record in the state legislator in Illinois and the US Senate. He ran way left during the Democrat primary and tried to run as a moderate during the general election. He funded a campaign from unknown scrupulous donors like Mickey Mouse and Howard Hughes. Obama is influence, by his own choice, radical associates ranging from a terrorist to a corrupt businessman, who supported his campaign. It seems that there are a lot of people Obama owes for winning the White House.

Don't be fool by his leadership. His good fortunes are pure coincidences. It is incredible that a man, who was a community organizer turned to an ineffective state senator then to a 3 year term US Senator, who only served 1 year while running for presidency, is able to achieve highest job in the land without any experience. It is now what you know; it's who you know. That is how Obama will govern this country. Obama owes so many people that he will be an lame duck president. We are seeing Obama returning the favor back to his "master." Obama's policy will be ramrod unbeknownst to the public eye. Already, he is planning to return the favor of his donors like the unions with the Employee Free Choice Act and the Pro-Choice movement with the Freedom of Choice Act.

So, Al-Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al Zawahri is not completely wrong with his statement.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Employee Free Choice Act is what Obama Wants. He is such a Typical Thug

In April 2008, then-Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said in Philadelphia, “I’ve fought to pass the Employee Free Choice Act in the Senate. And I will make it the law of the land when I’m president of the United States of America.”
President-elect Obama will move into the White House with increased Democratic majorities in both the House and Senate, which also support legislation designed to end of the declining union membership.
The bill replaces the secret ballot by allowing union organizers to publicly ask workers to sign a card in favor of unionizing. If a bare majority of employees approve, then an employer would have to recognize the union. Also, under the proposed bill, if parties can’t settle a dispute within 120 days, the dispute goes to an arbitration panel that can impose a contract that is binding for two years. Opponents of the bill say that would take away any incentive for either side to negotiate.
Card check passed the Democratic House last year but died in a Republican-led filibuster. As long as Republicans have 40 votes in the Senate, they can stop the bill.
It is not the Employee Free Choice Act, but rather, it is the forced choice act. There is no problem with the private ballot. If you eliminate that, it opens it up to coercion.
If Obama supported the proposal right away, it would cause uproar from small business owners across the country.
This could be a great opportunity for Obama to stand up against an issue that is bad for the country and would be bad for him, but this would be impossible, since his campaign was hugely funded by union supporters. Also, labor unions contributed about $400 million this year to congressional candidates who support the bill, according to the Workforce Fairness Institute. If the bill passes, the institute states unions can anticipate a rise in unionization to 80 percent.
I found a Heritage Foundation study citing evidence of coercion at workplaces where card check was used. An example of coercion was a card check campaign at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Union organizers said that workers who did not sign union cards would lose their jobs. Another example was a case with a United Steel Workers of America official threatened to report migrant workers to federal officials if they did not sign the cards. Well, I think that was self explanatory and very obvious of the abuse.

If you are unsure what Obama supports, just wait an see. I coming in bits and pieces, but shortly you will be shocked of his Socialistic views. Suppression and oppressing the voice of the American people is what you can expect from a thug-like Obama administration.

That's the change you can count on!

Friday, November 21, 2008

I May Not Own A Pet But I Do Love Dogs

I May Not Own A Pet But I Do Love Dogs

I'm going to digress from my political format and talk about something that majority of Americans can relate to emotionally and with sincere empathy.

For many of those who know me, I don't own a dog or cat. I am probably one of those outsiders who just don't understand the attachment between owner and pet. It wasn't until a good friend of mine brought to my house a cute puppy. It was a 10 week year old Shiba Inu. Watching this puppy grow up to a full size dog, my whole attitude and opinion about dogs and cats dramatically changed.

Being a pet lover, even though I don't own a dog or cat, the joys and therapeutic effects of having a pet also bring pain and undo psychological stress. I finally understand what pain and sadness feels like when a close friend of mine from Pennsylvania called me today and told me that the family decided to put down their dog. I actually shed a tear over the phone. It was a weird experience. Ask me ten years ago, I probably would had given you a different reaction.

This gut check I experienced made me realize that losing someone you love is the same whether it is human or animal. I finally understand that the connection to a pet has a stronger affinity than the relationship to other people. This is because animals provide us a special type of companionship and emotional intimacy that humans are unable to provide for each other. Tell me if I'm wrong. I believe that humans have a difficult time to give themselves freely to another person without expectation or judgement. The bond we have to a pet is indescribable and beyond words. It explains the way we feel when we hold a pet in our lap, the pleasure we get in watching them enjoy life, and their uncanny ability to know when we need comforting.

This special bond between owner and pet holds a great level of intimacy. It is this close bond that they share, which makes it impossible to cope when a pet dies. Like losing a loved one, a death of a pet can bring a huge emptiness and loneness in a home.

In today's society, pet have gone from the dog house to the bedroom. Our culture has accepted that the relationship between owner and pet are extremely important. We actually humanize our pets. We care for them much the same way parents care for their children. We feed our pets with the right food, provide medicine and medical care, and give them plenty of toys. There are owners that take their pets to daycare, take them for long walks, and let them run crazy at a dog park. I would call this relationship between owner and pet as "pet parent."

The only problem I find is that there isn't a lot of support groups for the grief process that results from a loss of a pet. I think talking to someone who has a pet or understand the gravity of the matter are the only choices that we have under our disposal. My only suggestion for my friend to help cope with his loss is a holding memorial service, make a scrapbook, donating money to a local shelter in his pet's name, and keeping something that was special of his dog like her favorite toy or keeping her ID tags.

I am not sure if my suggestions help, but he was grateful that he was able to talk to someone who can empathize with his loneness and pain. I am just grateful to be there for him and being part of his dogs life. Her name was Shelby and she was a gorgeous German Shepherd.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Never Allow a Crisis to Go To Waste

Never allow a crisis to go to waste

This is a real crisis that cannot be ignored. I don't feel sorry for Obama, but for the idiot voters that voted for him. As I said in my first sentence, we are in a crisis. I wonder if the voters now believe they had made a mistake. I wonder if these Obama supports honestly trust that their messiah can fix the economy, trade, the credit market, Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, the automaker bailout, the pirates hijacking oil tankers for ransom, the slumping stock market, Russian Putin wanting to come back in power, Israel and Palestine conflict, and Iran achieving enough nuclear material to make an atomic bomb.

In these trouble and uncertain times, I wonder if the American people made the right choice. With majority of Obama supports showing a lack of intelligence base on a Zogby's comprehensive poll after the election, I highly doubt the American people knew the implications of their decision in putting an inexperience man in office.

The market flocculation can be blamed on Obama's presidency. I don't want to hear the mumbo-jumbo of the metrics of the economy. This market is a psychological device showing how the American people feel. The market is run base on pure emotions. If you know owning a business, it is based on preparing for tomorrow. When you have a president who will raise our taxes, these companies will prepare for it. The will cut down on payroll, equipment, and change the way they invest. This is what we are seeing now.

The only way to solve most of our economic woe is to have the messiah make an announcement that he will not raise any taxes during this economic downturn. If he did that, you will see the market jump 1000 points and we will get out of this recession, but that is only a fantasy.

WHERE THE HELL IS OBAMA? I know he is not president yet, but he can talk to the American people of his plan. He can talk to the automakers and help resolve the crisis. Obama can start discussing among the leaders in Washington the direction he wants to lead. I though Obama would heal the world and it seems there is a world crisis that needs comforting. Heck, the American people needs reassurance and stabilize their confidence.

We already know what's going to happen. The market is reflecting on our current crisis and how we feel. Let me fill you in for those who are clueless. Obama's Chief of Staff said that they are planning big things because our current crisis provides an opportunity to get it done. Yeah, that is what Rahm Emanuel said.

The actual quote Emanuel said, "Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste. They are opportunities to do big things."

Under this view, the need to accomplish big-government action is the problem, and the crisis is the solution.

Keep this in mind, people of America. Is Obama's goal to fix the crisis -- or to use it to accomplish other things that he wanted to accomplish anyway?

So, I pose to the intellect Obama supporters this question. What do you think Emanuel meant? Let me help with the answer. Obama will allow the market to tank in order that he can spend like a drunken sailor to get out of it. It is a short term solution with a devastating long term effect. In other words, Obama will tax like crazy to get out of this mess.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Fancy Words Wont Get The Automakers Any Bailout Money

If you are pissed at this current economy, you need to know what the unions at the Big Three automakers want. These unions are the clandestine whore to this economy.  They are looking for a way to grab a nice chunk of the bailout package, and I hope they really fail. Even though the automakers want to keep these unionized benefits viable for their employees, the bailout may be a simple fix, but it won't solve their problem. Give them the funds to bail them out and they will come back for more 8 months later.
Did you know that an average unionized worker earns about $75 an hour in wages and benefits? That's more than $130,000 a year. That's about three times as much as the typical American worker. Did you know that employees at a Japanese auto plant in America makes between $42 and $48 an hour? It may not be chump change, but I think one could live on $80,000? In contrast, did you know the average American working in the private sector on average earns about $25 an hour?  OMG! I must be in the wrong business
So when you see the executives for General Motors, Ford and Chrysler pleading their case for a piece of the bailout, I would not feel sad or sorry for their current state. It's worth remembering that the UAW is the main cause for this mess. The union and these high salaries are chocking the Big Three. Rather than fixing the mess internally, the union wants the government to pony up the money.
What I am trying to say is that if the taxpayers are being asked to bailout for the Big Three automakers, the UAW should dissolve itself from the automakers. Maintaining this rate of pay is unsustainable in the current economic environment. Is it me or does everybody get the message except for Detroit?

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Lieberman wins and Libertards are Rioting

The Democrat Majority are bunch of wimps. They control everything. They own the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. But since it seems that Republican Senator Norm Coleman may win a re-election recount and Senator Saxby Chambliss is favored to win a Georgia run-off,  the Democrat Majority is scared that if they lose Lieberman, he would caucusing with the Republicans. Besides, if by chance the Democrats get that super Majority, they don't want to lose Lieberman and the moderate Democrats who sides with him.

In order to save face, the Senate Democrats are stressing that they need a pro-McCain Joe Lieberman in the caucus to have any chance at a super majority.  So instead of punishing Lieberman, the Democrat caucus voted to give the former Democratic VP candidate a wrist slap for continually attacking Obama during the campaign season.

From The AP:

"Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential campaign.

The Connecticut independent will lose a minor panel post as punishment for criticizing Obama this fall.

Lieberman's colleagues in the Democratic caucus voted 42-13 Tuesday to approve a resolution condemning statements made by Lieberman during the campaign but allowing him to keep the Homeland Security Committee gavel. He will leave the Environment and Public Works panel, however."
What a bunch of wimps.
Look for the tirade of screams from the nutroots to begin

Zogby Poll Showing How Obama Voters Are Idiots

On November 4th, 2008, we witnessed millions of Americans were shocked, but not surprised, that a man of Barack Obama's limited experience, who is extremely Liberal, and has radical associations could be elected President of the United States. For many of these Americans, we knew how he won. It's the mainstream media, who simply refused to do their job to vet him, being completely entranced with Obama.
On Election Day twelve Obama voters were interviewed extensively right after they voted to learn how the news media impacted their knowledge of what occurred during the campaign. These voters were chosen for their apparent intelligence, verbal abilities and willingness to express their opinions to a large audience. Even though these twelve Obama supports fail miserably, this small sample was integrated into a broader poll by Zogby, who polled high school graduates and college graduates.

Zogby Poll

512 Obama Voters 11/13/08-11/15/08 MOE +/- 4.4 points
97.1% High School Graduate or higher, 55% College Graduates
Results to 12 simple Multiple Choice Questions

57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing)

81.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)

82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)
88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)

56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).
And yet.....

Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes

Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter

And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her "house," even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!

Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.
Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we "gave" one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)

Therefore, on Election Day, the reason why Obama won the election is because stupid voters voted for him. I mean, there were lots and lots of stupid voters who voted for someone that would have failed this Zogby poll.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Polls Show Obama Voters Are Idiots

As part of his forthcoming documentary, "Media Malpractice... How Obama Got Elected," John Ziegler released a new web video along with the findings of a nationwide Zogby poll of Obama voters he commissioned. Ziegler appeared on Fox News Channel's "Hannity and Colmes" and gave them the exclusive story before Zogby's official release tomorrow.

Let me clue you in on the random polls conducted to these Obama voters. THEY ARE MORONS! Simple questions from who is currently the majority party in Congress to which candidate had a pregnant child, their answers will surprise you. Find out how these idiots didn't know Obama said he campaigned in 57 states, but expressed with confidence that they knew Palin was the candidate who spend $150,000 in clothes.

It's pathetic that they let these imbeciles into the voting booth. Oh, if you are saying that I'm suppressing the right to vote, I'm sorry. I thought you were going to call me a racist. Morons!

The purpose of the video/poll was to examine the impact of the news media on what Obama voters knew (or thought they knew) about the campaign.

All of the shocking results can be found at

The YouTube version of the video is below. Please feel free to spread the video as much as you can!

Obama Gave Israel to the Terrorist

I have always said from day one that the Jewish people, who voted for Obama for president, are fools. To believe anything Obama says is unfounded because he tends to flip-flop his views for political expediency. Now, this messiah has decided to end the state of Israel under the hands of its enemies.  According to Obama's senior adviser, Obama said, "Israel would be crazy to reject such a plan, since it would give them peace with the Muslim world.
What president-elect Obama is proposing to revert Israel back to its pre-1957 borders, in order to gain diplomatic favor among the Muslim world. Can you say, "Suicide?" This has been Obama's Mideast peace policy. Hey, he flipped-flop his view by saying that he would like to see the capital of Jerusalem to be divided and shared between Palestine and Israel. And this is the guy who says he sides with Israel?
Obama Mideast Peace Policy is based on supporting behind a 2002 Saudi peace initiative. Now, don't let any Obama supporters fool you by say that the Saudi peace initiative is the right plan because it was endorsed by Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, the Arab League, and Israeli President Shimon Peres.  Obama, in his infinite wisdom of distorting the truth, is correct that this was supported by high levels of the Israeli government, but it doesn't mean it was a good plan.
Do you consider a plan that would allow Israel to restore the Golan Heights to Syria and give Palestinians to establish a state capital in east Jerusalem? Well that is the 2002 Saudi Peace Initiative that Obama is endorsing.
I will stand my original ground that Obama never been on the side of Israel. Instead, he has calculated the destruction of Israel.
Yeah, that's the change you can count on.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Oh No! Obamas Change is Reliving the Clintons 90s

Do you want to catch a glimpse of an Obama Administration and see what the future hold? You don't need to look far and check out Obama choices and those considered to be part of his administration. I can confidently say that the bulk of Obama's cabinet will be old-time Clinton cronies and recycled Washington insiders, who are currently running the transition team to his new style politics of change?

Can't the anti-Washington-insiders and the president-elect find anyone who isn't a Beltway losers? There are far better individuals with experience who are well apt to fulfill those positions. But judging by the appointments to his transition committee and leaks about possible Cabinet choices, Obama appears to be practicing the politics of status quo, not the politics of change.

What happened to the messiah's message of innovation and emphatic commitment to change the culture of Washington and bring in new people, new ideas, and new ways of doing business. To the people who vote for Obama, don't you feel stupid and duped. Idiots!

Well, it seems your messiah has decided to bring back the old Washington hacks, party regulars, and Clinton cronies that Obama once had frequently criticized. As a soon to be president-puppet elect, Obama has reached out to the same old folks who dominate the Democratic Party and represent the status quo for decades.

His transition committee consist of chairman, John Podesta, a former Clinton's chief of staff who presided over outrageous last-minute Clinton pardons, and Carol Browner, who was Clinton's former EPA administrator and whose husband was part of the Fannie Mae mess.

Also on the transition team, we have Bill Daley, Clinton's former secretary of commerce and the brother of the mayor of Chicago, is the epitome of the old Democratic establishment. Clinton appointed him to the Fannie Mae board and his son worked as a lobbyist for the agency. Aren't these the kind of folks that Obama ran against?

The first Cabinet appointment is a brash speaking, Rahm Emanuel, the new White House chief of staff. Rahm is also a former Clinton White House staffer, who is blatant and obnoxious. He spent his White House years leaking to The Washington Post whenever he didn't like what the president was doing. Even Bill Clinton stopped trusting him. So any rumors within the Obama presidency in the next four years can be trace to the chief of staff. Besides, Rahm's is known for his strident demeanor laced with the 'F' word in every sentence and that will match well with Bidens gaffe and stupidity. The smartest move is trying to appoint Hillary Clinton to the Secretary of State. That would keep her away from any aspirations for the presidency 2012. Yeah, it seems Obama is forming his Cabinet just fine.

If anything that history had taught us, an Obama Administration mimicking the Clinton Administration will be a disaster. While Obama's eloquence will carry him so far, he will raise taxes like Clinton and allow our national security to weaken. Remember, under Clinton, we had at least 5 attacks by terrorist. So, if Obama is trying to relive the 1990's all over again, I hope the messiah really have something up his sleeve because it's going to get ugly.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Bailout Will Be Used to Purchase Employees Viagra

If I were to tell you that bailing out the automakers will give those employees the proper access to medications to "get it up," what would you say? Have you seen the benefits these employees get while working at the auto industry? It's obscene!

I was at a pharmacy buying a few over-the-counter necessities and I overheard an older gentleman arguing with the cashier at the pharmacy department why his auto union card doesn't cover his Viagra. I had to stop and eavesdrop. LOL. This older gentleman said that the union pays for Viagra. So, the cashier reprocessed his insurance card. A co-pay was generated and the man was yelling why did his co-pay go up. I had to leave the pharmacy before I couldn't restrain myself in laughter.

I had to do some internet research and found out that one of the benefits the automakers gives to their employees are medications for impotence.

Although I am unable to find Ford nor Chrysler's disclosure on the amount spent on erectile dysfunction drugs, I found out that GM recently raised the co-pay for erectile dysfunction drugs to $20 under an agreement with the UAW.

The automaker spends over $11 billion each year on health care. While lifestyle drugs are a small fraction of the total medical bill, it has been estimate that it cost $1500 per car to pay the companies healthcare expenses. Given the large number of aging autoworkers in the U.S., the industry's Viagra tab and bill for other erectile dysfunction drugs is certain to continue rising.

While many government and company health plans have eliminated the "special blue pill" drug from coverage plans, GM has more than two retirees for every active worker on its payroll, and in order be must viable, the auto industry must negotiate eliminating the "Viagra" drugs from the union health plan with the UAW.

So, while we are mulling over this bailout of the auto industry, their main priority is figuring how to keep these old geezers stiff and happy. Let end this and make the auto industry seek a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, end the unions, and move them to a Right to Work state. This is one area which mismanagement, poor decision, and corruption has lead to the downfall of the American automaker.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Let the Auto Industry Seek Bankruptcy

Can you tell me what ownership this Federal Government managed that has been a success? Social Security sucks. Medicare Sucks. Postal Services sucks. Fannie Mae/Freddie mac sucks. The DMV really sucks. Actually, I don't think there is a government program that worked.

So, we can assume that when the government owns a business, it will never be as successful than the private sector. Therefore, when the government wants to own banks, oil companies, and the auto industry, you can guarantee with certainty a disaster.

Today, Congress is very aggressive to bailout the auto industry by loaning them our tax payers money with no guarantee that it would work. And the reason it won't work is due to greedy unions that represent these automakers. I'm not blaming these automakers. I own a Ford Mustang and I love my car. I blame the union idiots that have handcuff the whole industry. These unions have raised overhead to the point the companies cannot sell at competitive prices.

Throwing a big bailout check at an industry is simply throwing money into the fire. It's not going to solve the financial problems that the unions mishandled. It's not going to produce cheaper and efficient cars. The answer to this is to get rid of the unions. To bailout using our tax payers money, we are just propping up a failing industry.

If the auto industry can stop these blood sucking unions, the industry can move shop into a Right to Work state, allowing companies to merge, or let it go into bankruptcy.

I would prefer to see bankruptcy proceedings to occur. I think it would benefit for the industry and the tax payer. Bankruptcy is not the end of a company. The most important point is that filing bankruptcy would allow the companies to rid themselves of the union contracts and start fresh with a free market labor force. By this restructuring, there will more freedom to hire the right workers to produce a better product for a lot less money without the constraints of a counter productive union.

If you feel skeptical, look what happened to the airline industry? Many of them went through bankruptcy, and yet, they are still here. So, lets do what is right? Congress has wasted $4 trillion dollars of our tax dollars. Do us a favor. Let the auto industry seek bankruptcy and let them learn from their mistakes. Enough is enough.

Welcome to the Fourth Reich.

I am so flabbergasted to hear poll stating that 72% of the American people voice confidence that newly elected tyrant will make the necessary changes to revive the economy. What sickens me is that 44% of Republicans joined nearly all Democrats and most independents in expressing that belief.

Well, I call them Republican Moderates and they don't express the philosophy of the Conservative party. I am able to back my statement because history tells us that taxing anyone during these darkest economic times is a recipe for disaster. A good example was during the Great Depression under FDR. To see how the majority of the American people are desperate to see an improvement of this wretched economy is a big undertaking of Mein Furor Obama. It will be a major disappointment if Mein Furor doesn't deliver. At least I belong to a Minority of educated people who understands this economy and will be prepared when Mein Furor screws it further.

In the same poll, it showed that 68% said they think that when Mein Furor takes office in January, the new dictator will be able to enact the policies he pushed during his presidential campaign. Now, this will be interesting to watch and I am going to laugh my ass off when Obama is unable to deliver.

I'm interest how this tax cut for the 95% of the working Americans will be implemented. Obama has not once gave a detail assessment how this particular policy will work. Base on these polls, I can see that income tax cut is lesser of a priority and more emphasis on strengthening the economy. And how would you strengthen the economy? The answer is creating JOBS! And how do you create jobs? Well, it won't be by raising taxes and that is what Obama is going to do.

This is not rocket science. Mein Furor will collapse this economy and say it's not his fault. Then he will expand the Federal Government and open the flood gate to his Socialist agenda.

Welcome to the Fourth Reich.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

The Democrat Majority Spent Close to $4 trillion this Year Alone

Please stop the lunacy of Secretary of Treasury Paulson with our money. It is now a month since his plea that he needs $700 billion to fix this economy or it will collapse. Well, it is now one month past and his dire message was a blatant lie.
Back in October, the purpose of his bailout was to buy up toxic mortgage assets to spur fresh lending, but one month later, that same $700 billion bailout will be used in making direct investments to the financial institutions to shoring up the consumer credit markets, which I highly doubt. So, instead of helping the consumer who are suffering, we are going to bail out the banks instead. Oh, that makes a lot of sense (sarcasm).

So, that dumbass Paulson wants to tap the funds to inject capital into banks and ailing insurer AIG. He is talking about wanting to use part of the bailout to help those who give out car loans, student loans, credit cards, and possibly help the auto industry. While being unapologetic, Paulson saying that buying those toxic mortgage would take too long and would not be sufficient to calm a turbulent markets. So, is this the better alternative?

Let's breakdown this $700 billion bailout plan. The Treasury has allocated $250 billion of the bailout funds to inject capital into banks and it has pledged another $40 billion to shore up AIG, leaving just $60 billion to dole out before it would have to ask Congress to release the final $350 billion. If this anger you, guess what the Democrat Majority has done in the past year?

Congress increased total federal spending by 11 percent to nearly $3 trillion. Recently, they enacted $333 billion in "emergency" spending and enacted $105 billion in tax rebates. I cannot believe the Democrat Congress and the Moderate Republican handcuffed the President to push the budget deficit to $455 billion in the name of "stimulus."

So far, these wasteful spending did not increase
economic growth. Now, in addition to passing a $700 billion financial bailout package, lawmakers have decided to double down on these failed spending policies by proposing a $300 billion economic stimulus bill. I guess Congress seem to have convinced themselves that the next $300 billion will succeed. I was told that the total spending from Congress will amount to $4 trillion and that is 25% of our GDP. To make a comparison, the US spent 4% of our GDP in the military to keep us safe.

If you don't feel my rage and pissed off, you are an idiot. Make your voice heard and don't let these elected idiots waste our hard earn money on an idea that won't work.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Obama WILL Halt Public Drilling For Oil. Here We Go Again

I read this from

Yesterday's announcement that the president-elect would almost certainly use his executive order power to curtail previously authorized drilling on some public lands signals that the Obama Administration will be a friend of rising oil prices.

Recent discoveries in places like Brazil should be powering American exploration efforts forward, as should the forecast for a return soon to triple digit oil prices.

Oil was below $60 a barrel two days after President-elect Obama triumphed last week.  That will be the price on which to evaluate his Administration in two and four years.

Mein Furor Obama Wants to Close Club Gitmo but What About Its Prisioners

Mein Furor Obama has elected his options to close Club Gitmo permanently. To every Kool-Aid drinker out there supporting this idiotic decision, what do we do with the prisoner at Club Gitmo? I guess Liberals can only think small segments at a time. I always wonder how they are able to function on a daily bases. I need to be patient with special needs people. So, to all Liberals, please take it up a notch.

Bringing the terrorists to the U.S. will produce consequences that will begin to roll up immediately, not the least of which will be the cost associated with the merger of the military tribunal system into the criminal justice system. The safety of the terrorists within the U.S. prison population will also become an issue, as will release issues. If they are release, do we let them free within our own borders? Do we allow them to mingle in general population with other criminals. I can see a major upheaval within our prison system that could cause irreversible damage.

The rhetoric of "closing Gitmo" is just the first instance where the reality of governing will prove much more difficult than that of campaigning.  While aspects of the aftermath of the Boumediene ruling remain to be worked out via the habeas proceedings underway, a rush to close Gitmo laced with rhetoric about "kangaroo courts" is a certain way to launch the new Administration in the wrong direction when it comes to national security.

This will be a major problem that will assist in destroying America. Putting suspected terrorists in our prison system will only grow the anti-American sentiment among the general population. So, if Mein Furor Obama's intent to seek reparation of the injustices among the blacks, this is not the way. Annihilating this Nation is not the answer.

Mein Furor Obama Cannot Keep A Secret! Heil Obama!

I just wrote a blog about Obama pretending to be presidential, and I saw this article at the Drudge Report.

In a private meeting, Bush gave Obama a tour of the White House and both sat down in the Oval Office to discussed how to proceed a smooth transition and talk basic shop.

If this meeting is private with no aides or anyone in the room, you can assume that what was said between them does not leave the room. But right after the meeting, Obama ran to the press. It is obvious that Obama is making this leak as an effort to undermine the president's remaining days in office. It was only Obama in the room with Bush. Who do you think leaked the conservation if no one else was in the room? Duh!

It seem that Obama is disillusioned again pretending he is commander-in-chief. He thinks this is the TV show 'West Wing.' Obama should use his head once in a while. It is an understood tradition that conversations between presidents is a private affair.
So, what would you think when details of their confidential conversation began leaking out to the press? Yes, Bush was pissed.

At least we know one thing, Obama can't keep a secret. Heavens forbid if Obama leaked top secret information to China or other countries that hate us. I see this as a defiant act against Bush. This is pathetic. Obama destroyed the trust and exposed his thug-like persona in front of George W. Bush, who opened the White House doors to the Obamas. Instead of being gracious, Obama acted like a typical Chicago thug politician.

Obama will never change. Obama is as arrogant and disillusioned just like Hitler, who didn't stop till he get absolute power and died trying to get it.

Heil Obama! Heil Obama!!

Obama Needs To Stop Acting Presidential and Be Presidential

I saw how MSNBC is determined to describe the Obama Administration to the TV series 'West Wing'. It is so laughable to hear that there is somehow a connection to potential cabinet members of Obama and the fictitious characters of the TV show.

This is not a reality show. I am starting to get sketched out by the stupidity of the media putting a fog to the American people that this is all a game. I did not expect JFK's Camelot to be handed over to a dictator like Obama to carry the legacy.

But so far, Obama has made gaffes, political missteps, and made a fool by the comics, the TV comedy shows, and the media. The one thing I must agree is that every media outlet has described Obama as acting presidential. So far, I have noticed Obama acting presidential or may look presidential, but never seen him as being presidential.

I wonder if Obama will end his fantasy of being a perfect commander-in-chief and stop acting like a make believe president in 'West Wing.' To be disillusioned is dangerous when a real crisis occurs. So, if Iran bombs Israel, I hope Obama, in his wacky world, doesn't call the president of Iran to knock it off, and everything would be "honky dory." That is not how the world works. This is not television.

So on the one hand, Obama thinks he is playing the lead role in 'West Wing', and the on other hand, he thinks he is a thug-like Chicago politician. I think Obama need to watch less of the big screen and be president for a change.

Mr. Obama, you are not a movie star. You are not the messiah. You are not rock star. You are not a black Mafia. You need to stop acting like Hitler. You need to be presidential. I know it's hard, but at least try. Remember, the United States is the good guys. Okay!

Mein Furor Wants a Gestapo. Heil Obama!

Mein Furor Wants a Gestapo. Heil Obama!

I am jubilant that I am not the only person in America to compare Obama as a fascist dictator. A congressman from Georgia fears that president-elect Obama will establish a Gestapo-like security force and govern this country like Nazi Germany.

Last week, I wrote a very similar blog that supports Congressman Paul Boun (R-Ga.) concern. It may sound nuts, but recent developments demonstrate that Obama has a set of agendas that will set this country back for generations. I'm grateful that Congressman Boun read my blog! Yay!! We want to point out that there is a conflicting problem in Obama's philosophy of radical Marxism with governance of Nazism.

Before you left wingers have a conniption, my Nazi comment is rooted by a July speech by Obama in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military. Now, before one spins this to hide the obvious, this is exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it's exactly what the Soviet Union did. Obama said, "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

To those who are slow understanding, Obama is proposing to have a national security force that's answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. Military. Please tell me that this is not Nazism.

Let's take it one step further. If Obama gets his "Storm Trooper" established, there is no reason to have guns. Why would there be gun ownership if we have a national police force?

How can Obama hold the oath of office if he doesn't respect to the Second Amendment right to bear arms? Obama did say he favors "common sense" gun laws. I would interpret it that Obama will at least limit ownership of assault weapons and concealed weapons. I base my reasoning on Obamas position as an Illinois state lawmaker. Obama supported a ban on semiautomatic weapons and tighter restrictions on firearms. For those who don't believe, look at his record.

I wrote in my last blog that we are a complacent country. We are always late in responding to a crisis. Let me forewarn to the American people that they need to remember what happened in WW2. Typically, history will repeat itself. Do you remember learning in history class about Hitler being elected in a democratic Germany? Do you remember he took a country that was in a deep recession into a superpower? I'm not saying that Obama is a Hitler, but there is the potential.

So far, I have seen how Obama used his minions to suppress the critics on the internet. I have seen the control that Obama has with the media. I have seen the propaganda spread by his supporter throughout television, radio, and the newspaper. I have seen the Liberal ideology of redistribution of wealth. I seen how Obama has the support of Republican Moderates trying to destroy the ideology of a true Conservative in Sarah Palin, even after the election was over.

This type of control is not seen directly. Obama has master this technique with precision. He is trying to keep his messiah-like qualities unscathed, while he indirectly uses his minions to do his dirty work. Similar to Hitler, Obama is a Chicago thug using oppression and repression to one day govern this country.

Monday, November 10, 2008

RNC Getting A Major Overhaul

The Republican National Committee will do a major overhaul of their organization once Mike Duncan's term expire as chairman in January 2009. Michael Steele, former Lt. Governor of Maryland, and Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House, are two major Conservative leaders vying for that prestigious post.

A National publication, American Spectator, gave a hint that former Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) wants to be the General Chairman of the RNC. Fred Thompson's role will be doing public speeches to convey the Conservative Movement.

While the RNC is getting a facelift, rumors are escalating that Governor Sarah Palin will run for presidency in 2012.

This is a positive change for all Republicans. Conservatism will be the national platform. This is why Moderate Republican are scared to death. This is why they are still attacking Sarah Palin well after the election is over. No more weak candidates that are unable to convey a message. The RNC will find a leader with Reagan-like qualities that will galvanize the base.

This is what I wanted to see, and that is a purge of wannabe Republicans in both chambers of Congress. Being a half-ass Republican is obtrusive and degrading to the Conservative Movement.

The Military Never Gets Credited With A Job Well Done

I'm honored to stand next to a military serviceman/woman. I'm honored to shake hands of veteran that I don't know. I am embarrassed by Americans who say one thing and do another. I hear the support of our military, but actions does speak louder than words. I get pissed off when universities and college don't allow the military to canvas on their campus, but allow a Iranian dictator to plead his case to the student body. I get annoyed to see a serviceman in uniform sitting in the mist of civilians in a crowded airport or a food court and get ignored. I get irate when a parent stomps their foot down not letting their sons or daughters serve this great nation. Parents don't own their children.

So, I'm assuming that when a half-dozen off-duty Marines raced through a burning motel and saved sleeping guests in that fire will be downplayed as local news and ignored by the general public.

Well, that just happened yesterday around 8 a.m. at a local Americas Best Value Inn motel in California. These off-duty Marines saved all 6 sleeping guest, including one elderly man who required oxygen after he was carried to safety by one of the Marines.

These Camp Pendleton-based Marines, who were on leave, were also staying at the motel. These young men are heroes, but I only saw one news network talking about it. This is pathetic. I understand the military never gets the credit they deserve and the military understands that the gratitude from us is implied. But why should it?

When you have a majority of the American people wanting to see Gitmo close down, a majority of Democrats wanting to slash the military, and many Americans view our veterans as ordinary people, I see it very clear that the honor we bestowed to the military is being taken for granted. What does it take to change that belief? Another attack? It is sad the our complacency is an inflicted disease that we have to endure. It's is not our fault. The freedom that we have taken for granted is the complacency we are condemned to live with.

I'm embarrassed to be a citizen of this great nation in the mist of pansy, me first, complacent, selfish, tree hugging, ignorant American Soviets.

Hell with the Auto Industry. What about Us?!

This $700 billion bailout has not been implemented yet. It is now close to a month and the government hasn't decided how to divvy up the cash. I understand that the bailout is not a handout, rather it's a specified interest loan by the federal government. More on that later.

Right now, the train of industries asking for this handout is enormous. So far, we have the banking industry, mortgage industry, housing industry, student loan industry, financial industry, insurance industry, and now, the auto industry asking for a piece of the $700 billion bailout. I say screw it! Let them all fail. What ever happen to bailing out the struggling American families that fuels this economy?

The auto industry is close to an agreement with Congress in getting as much as $50 billion in new government loans to help the struggling industry, on top of $25 billion already approved. Enough is enough.

Why should we bailout the auto industry? I don't care if Pelosi and Reid are pleading to save the auto industry by saying that it is the heart of our manufacturing sector and ten of thousands of American jobs on the line.

Who the hell cares? Why throw more money to fix a broken problem?

I blame it on a counter productive auto union, poor management , and an obscene taxes in Michigan. Honestly, a bailout would simply give these clowns more money to line their pockets with. Remember AIG wasting their bailout money for an all expense paid excursion thanks to tax payers money?

I have said earlier that this bailout to the auto industry is really a very low-interest loan that MUST be paid back in a specific time frame. Whether this bailout is intended for the auto industry or any industries that I mentioned earlier, who cares. Let them fail! Capitalism is survival of the fittest. Profit is king, but be responsible to the consequences you undertake.

My concern is to the small business that makes up a good portion of our economy. Why don't we bailout these struggling small businesses instead? It seems there is no way in hell that any small business owner in the United States would ever receive such preferential treatment in the form of a very low interest loan with minimal payback requirements from the government. Is that fair?

The auto industry is failing due to the United Auto Workers union pressure on the automakers.  After all, they are calling for strikes for everything and anything. The pressure is starting to drive many of the big three automakers to move their plants to Right to Work states and abroad because they can afford to do business in states with Right to Work laws. Ask yourself, why pro-union states like Michigan & Ohio have high unemployment & losing business infrastructure compared to those Right to Work states like Florida & Tennessee?

So, if we allow the unions to dominate and let bad fiscal decisions to continue to decline in the auto industry, I would suggest to the auto industry to pack up and leave. Maybe, they need to look at their budget and slash spending.  Perhaps, the auto industry should move to states with a Right to Work law, where production is cheaper.

But I forgot one thing and that is a Barack Obama presidency. The pro-union Obama will endanger the state Right to Work laws. Bailing out industries is not what American government was designed to do.  In fact, Obama should read the U.S. Constitution and The Federalist Papers before assuming the oath of office.  If you bailout Wall Street and Detroit, then the government should bail the rest of us out as well.

Sunday, November 9, 2008


Obama gave his first press interview this past Friday and I notice something peculiar. He took the podium with a handful of high power Democrats behind him. His persona was the same demeanor that I saw that night when Obama took the stage on his presidential victory. It was odd. Obama looked SCARED. He really did look scared. As if he didn't figure on winning, but now wondered what the hell he would do. Obama may try to look presidential, but he look timid and weak. He wasn't as crisp and seems to be out of rhythm. The eloquence was there, but the charisma was lacking. He tried to be someone he wasn't and being funny was not one of them.

For such an historic moment, the atmosphere in the room was not of excitement. Obama never even had to pause for a reaction or adoration from the press. The energy level was low. In fact, Obama wished there was fireworks, balloon drop, and confetti. His speech was not at all inspiring. I remember after Obama's presidential victory speech people left kind of quietly. It was a major letdown after all the hype. It was a sad sight to behold. That's how I interpreted after Obama gave his first press interview. His speech was full of empty rhetoric with no substance and few gaffes.

I saw a very diverse group of people, the mainstream media, with their love for Barack being the one thing to unite them. The media supported him from day one, and now the media realized they made the wrong choice. I think the media over hyped him and he'll never live up to the expectations and he knows it.

When Obama had his first press conference, I sense doubts turned into regret among the media. Yeah, what was up with that stupid sign "office of the president-elect." Why did the reporters stand when he entered the room? Is it because they have been in bed with him from the beginning? You betcha! Obama is a creation of the media. Even he knows it. And maybe he is afraid everyone else is going to find out. I bet Obama is saying to himself, "Crap! Crap! I won and WTF am I going to do now!"

I fear for this country and this is no exaggeration. You have elected an illusion, a empty suit for president. I say to the Obama supporters, "What have you done!" Because you hate Bush, who did not run in this election, you have chosen the final link to the unholy trinity of the anti-christ of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, who will lead us in these troubled times.

You have chosen a reckless trio who will run this government like a Socialist country. The new Democratic order will cut the legs of the fortunate and bring them to the level of the less fortunate in utter misery. This new world order created by the Democrat Majority will force us to be dependent on government handouts. Like being addicted to crack cocaine, this dependency will cause a viscous cycle that will be difficult to break. In order to keep this environment constant, Obama will govern this country like Hitler's Nazi Germany. Obama has talk about creating another peoples army along side the military and the national guard. This has intonation to Hitler's Gestapo, or his personal police. Obama has a legion of 3 million internet goons to police and suppress the critics. Obama owns organizations like ACORN to suppress the voters and manipulate elections. Obama's arrogance and cruelty can be seen by throwing people he cares under the bus. I question his honor that he did not attend his recently deceased grandmother's memorial or funeral services. Instead, he went to play basketball. How would you interpret that? Also, Obama has kicked out 3 members of the press off his plane because Obama found out that the paper these reporters work for supported McCain.

This unholy alliances between this president-elect and the leaders of congress can be seen as a recipe for disaster. If they try to stay center on issues, it will fail because their nature will always go back to their true Liberal self. America better get use to being called "The United States of the Soviet Republic." Heil, Obama! Heil, Obama!

Friday, November 7, 2008

Obama's First Gaffe as president-elect

It is the first gaffe as president-elect. Obama says in his first post-election press conference that he's spoken to all the former living presidents. Why would he talk to dead ones? Idiot! Then catching himself in "a Jay Leno sound bite," Obama had to say something stupid. Whether or not it was intended as a joke, it was very inappropriate. He causally blurted a joke at the expense of the widow of a famous deceased president.

Obama said, "I have spoken to all of them who are living... I didn’t want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any séances."

He was responding to a question, from the Chicago Sun-Times' Lynn Sweet, about whether he'd spoken to all of the "living" former presidents.

First, Nancy Reagan consulted with an astrologer after Ronald Reagan was shot. It was Mary Todd Lincoln who held actual séances for Hillary Clinton, while as First Lady. It was reported that Hillary Clinton held imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt.

We have seen gaffe from Obama throughout the primaries and the general election. I think he is not going to stop while as president.

I am curious to know when the honeymoon will end. I want to see the media show their true ruthless demeanor because it is pissing me off that Obama' gaffe is being overlooked.

Obama Broke His Promise by Supporting The Fairness Doctrine

Barack Obama pick Henry Rivera to head the Federal Communications Commission transition team.

Henry Rivera is a former Democratic FCC commissioner, former lobbyist, and currently a partner at communications law firm Wiley Rein.

Henry Rivera is a longtime radical leftist expected to bring back the Fairness Doctrine and end conservative talk radio. This will play well to those idiot Democrat senators who supports it. Rivera will play a pivotal role in preventing Obama's critics from having a public voice during Obama's tenure in office.

Rivera worked under the Reagan Administration as FCC director and resigned from the FCC because Reagan believes that the Fairness Doctrine as contradiction to civil rights issue. Rivera's departure during the Reagan Administration paved the way for the Fairness Doctrine's repeal when the late president appointed Patricia Diaz Dennis in 1986 to fill out the rest of Rivera's term.

If Rivera did not resigned, talk radio as we know it today would not exist. Now, this idiot is back to reclaim past glory.

Rivera will have the opportunity to end conservative talk radio in June 2009, as the term of Republican Robert McDowell expires. Once Rivera takes over, I can assure you that this idiot will replace with a pro-Fairness Doctrine ideology. He will accomplish this by making the commission all pro-Democrats. By using the Obama goon-like tactic, Rivera will control the commission.

You may ask what will Rivera and the Fairness Doctrine will do? One way is that the FCC will regulate the content of speech on the radio. In other words, the FCC will censor all radio programs base on unfairness complaints.

Another way how conservative talk radio will be screwed is by forcing these station to carry liberal talk programming in order to comply with the law. That means Air America Radio, a liberal talk radio, will benefit from the Fairness Doctrine's implementation.

But my question is wouldn't liberal talk stations also be also required to run conservatives talk radio? Hmm. I would like to pose that this Fairness Doctrine is a violate to the First Amendment. It is unconstitutional and I would challenge anyone who believes I am wrong. Since when the government can control what is said over the 'public' airways.

Yup, that's the change you can believe in. Obama is washing his hands on this because this appointment doesn't need to go through Congress. I have said that Obama is going to govern like President Woodrow Wilson by bullying, suppressing, and being tyrannical.

Hey! To all Independent voters, who supported Obama and against the Fairness Doctrine, what do you think about him now? Idiots!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Harry Reid Punishes Joe Lieberman

It is typical of Democrats to throw one of their own under the bus. Obama demonstrated that talent like a pro when he threw his own grandmother, Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, and Bill Ayers under the bus.

Now, Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid, who has rumors about his leadership questioned by his caucus, had a private meeting with Joe Lieberman and told Joe that his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee may be defaulted to another Senator. Reid is annoyed that Lieberman gave the key note speech at the Republican National Convention and toured with McCain on the campaign trail.

Democrats in the past had tolerated Lieberman's political straddling because he held their slim 51-49 majority in his hands. Now that Democrats have strengthened their hold in the Senate to at least 55 seats as a result of Tuesday's election, Lieberman no longer is vital to their majority control.

It is blatantly obvious of the Democrat Majority's intent of eating one of their own. They showed it when the Democrats left Lieberman for dead when Lieberman lost in the Senatorial primaries in Connecticut, but won as an Independent in the general election with the support of the Republican party.

Right now, the Democrats do not hold a 60 filibuster proof majority. Lieberman can caucus with the Republicans and really make it impossible for Democrats to push their liberal agenda.

Either way, it is a plus for the Republicans because what the Democrats did was not surprising.

The Media Gave Obama the White House? What Next?

Now, the idiot drive-by media are back tracking their orgasmic, tingle up their leg love about Barack Obama. The media has manipulated this election to put an inexperienced black man as president for good ratings and good stories for the next 4 years. Knowing a lot about McCain, the media knew that a 4 year McCain Administration would been boring.

I listened to Charlie Rose and Tom Browkaw talked about not knowing a lot about Barack Obama. They agreed that he is an enigma and mystical. Well, if the media did their job, this would not been an issue after the election.

Now the media is criticizing that Obama is singular and a manipulative guy. The media is scared. They say its scary to see Obama on stage alone without his wife and kids during the victory presidential speech. The media is questioning his qualification as president. The media is questioning his associations. Well, they are 12 months too late.

Now, the media have realized their incompetence. The media have lost their credibility that they once had long past. This turn of event is small, but it will leak into something big. The media got they wanted and now they want to call unaccountability. Next on the media's agenda is to go after talk radio. That is another concern that the drive-by media wants to extinct. By silencing talk radio, the drive-by media will accomplish the monopoly of the news and will be able to structure their Liberal views onto the naïve American people.

All I can say, you idiots who supported Obama, I hope your family suffers. Because your vote to bring this inexperience joke into the presidency, I hope the Democrats increase the capital gain taxes, end coal technology, take away our 401K deductions, weaken our military, allow another attack on our shores, and let the AMT to continue, just to name a few. It will take pain and sufferance to change our point our view. I call them masochist, but that how the weak mind works.

Look here. NYC mayor Bloomberg is reneging out giving rebate checks and will increase the property tax. Mayor Bloomberg wants to decrease the budget deficits by raising taxes and cutting the budget. The NYC mayor wants to cut the fire and police force. This tax increase will drive people out of the city in fuller force and take NYC back before pre-Gulliani. What ever happened to curb the spending?

Now take that to a grander scale with Obama and the state of the economy. He wants to increase taxes and drive our corporations overseas or put them out of business. Let's bring unemployment through the roof. Can't you see what's going to happen? Obama and the left wing idiots want to bankrupt our economy in order to expand the government and grow the national deficit. It is another version of a FDR New Deal. That is the only time you will see the real agenda come into fruition of an Obama Administration.

But hey, it is my opinion and when I'm passionate about something, I am usually right. I said yesterday that an Obama win will tank the markets. Even though today the unemployment report was bleak, the Obamamania took the market into another drop by 400 point (2:15pm today). That is a 10% drop in two day and it is the most post-election drop in history.

I wonder if these Obama voters will one day say, "WHAT HAVE I DONE?" I hope they realize they voted for a person and a party that caused the downturn of this economy. Remember that Obama, Senator Chris Dodd, Rep. Barney Frank and the rest of the Democrat party had a huge part in the subprime mess, housing debacle, and the Fannie Mae crisis.

Well, at least, I don't need to hear anymore about blaming the Republicans or George Bush. I wonder who the Democrats will be blaming now for their stupidity.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Alot Happened in the first 24hrs of an Obama presidency

In a 24 hour Obama presidency, we seen the market tank close to 500 points. That was a prediction I had yesterday. That was not based on emotions, but on facts. The investors are already weary about an Obama presidency and it showed.

The market on the day of the election jumped 300 points due to the excitement of the voting process. Base on this raw emotion, I knew that reality will settle once Obama was named victor and it showed.
The market didn't slipped nor dropped. It was a 500 point tank.

Not only that occurred, Hamas was trying to sent a congratulation letter to Obama, but it didn't stop the terrorist group to launch rockets into Israel, breaking a truce that started back on June 2008.

Then, the Russian President gave a 90 minute state of the union speech and did not acknowledge Obama's presidential victory. Instead, the Russian President are sending missiles near Poland, a NATO ally.

Yup, we have seen an international crisis about to ensue and the market telling us that an Obama presidency is not kosher.

Wow, I never though so much would occur within the first day of an Obama presidency. Dang, we have another 3 year and 364 days to put up with.

It's going to be a long wait to see the light at the end of this tunnel.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

What Will Obama Do? Hamas Just Attack Israel

Wow! It didn't take long after the election was over that the first international crisis occurred. It was warned by Biden and now it starting to happen. Read this heading from the AP:

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) - Israel launched an airstrike on Gaza early Wednesday after its troops clashed with Hamas militants who fired mortars into Israel, leaving six Palestinians dead. It was the first battle since a June truce mostly quieted violence in the volatile territory.

Yup! We B FCKED! What will wonderboy do? Whay next? An al-Qaeda attack? Hey, you voted for the inexperience wannabe president, not me.

This is only the beginning.

Obama Wins. Markets Will Tank. We Be FCKED!

It proves that anybody can run for high office with no experience. I think I'm going to run for the Florida State Senate next year just to prove a point. Hey, Obama has done it for most of his life. So, why can't I.

I want to say to all those young people who voted for Obama that you just screwed yourself. The markets will tank tomorrow or sometime this week and that will cost you jobs.

To the investors and seniors, take your money out of the market. Your 401K and your retirement plan will suffer once Democrats take away the deductions.

To the rest of America, instead of the bottom to rise and have that chance to catch up to the level we desire, we will be thrown into utter misery and share with those who are lazy to make anything of themselves.

Yup, we be FCKED!

The only good outcome is that the Democrats did not get that 60 filabuster proof majority. Thank God!

I shall be there to point out your stupidity when Obama and the Democrat Majority slips up. No more blaming a Republican. So, stop your whining when things go wrong.

Monday, November 3, 2008

The Only Secret for an McCain Win

Just go out and vote. Simple as that!

Washington Redskins Must Win For a McCain Presidency

Since 1936, the Redskins final home game before Election Day had correctly predicted the winners of 17 straight elections until George W. Bush won in 2004, ending the streak.

The Washington Redskins are like the New England Patriots of last year when it comes to predictions of U.S. Presidential election results. Like the Patriots, they were almost perfect. Like the Patriots, it was the last Big Game they were on the losing end of. Like the Patriots, whose dreams and hopes were dashed when they lost the Super Bowl last February, the Redskins first election-predicting loss was huge, too.

With a Steelers win, the Redskins will have the same record in predicting U.S. elections as the Patriots season record last year.

Can the Redskins be an agent of change in the coming election? Or will things remain as they are? With a 94.444% accuracy since John McCain was born in 1936, it is at least worth looking at, even if just for fun.

This election year's final home game for the Redskins is a big Monday Night Football game for both teams. With the Pittsburgh Steelers at the Washington Redskins, who needs to win for your party?

For Barack Obama supporters, the Steelers must get a road win.

For John McCain supporters, the Redskins must win at home.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Obama Says I WILL Bankrupt the Coal Industry

Obama say back in January 2008 in San Francisco, California, that he will kill the coal industry. Obama says that he will allow the coal industry to continue, but it will go bankrupt. Obama says we will see energy prices sky rocket. Duh!

Don't forget Biden said the very same thing not too long ago.

So, this will affect those jobs and business in West Virginia, Missouri, Colorado, Ohio, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Well, look at that. These states are battle ground territory.

Hey, don't blame the messenger. We have it on audio. I think it's the smoking gun that will tip to McCain's favor. I wonder what hidden stories about Obama will surface in the next two days. So far, Obama is spinning to find an excuse of what he said on audio.

Yup, that's the change you can believe in.

Obama against same sex marriage but supports gay marriage in California

Obama told MTV he believes marriage is between a man and a woman and that he is not in favor of gay marriage. Then at the same time, Obama reiterated his opposition to Proposition 8, the California ballot measure which would eliminate a right to same-sex marriage that the state's Supreme Court recently recognized.

Typical Obama. Taking both sides of a position at the same time. It's not flip-flopping. I don't know what to call it beside a used-car salesman. Just say anything , and since you try not to look ignorant, you agree everything that charlatan says.

I call it being "Stuck on Stupid."

What say you?

Newt Gingrich Nailed It on the Head Against Obama

Read this article from Newt Gingrich about Barack Obama. He gives a fantastic insight on the difference between Obama and McCain. From destroying the religious aspect of our society and letting unions run amuck to laywers going sue-happy and judges making crap up, an Obama Administration will ruin the very core of this institution that we call the United States of America.



THERE are profound reasons to believe the McCain-Palin ticket offers a better future for most Americans than the Obama-Biden ticket.

Barack Obama is a very smart and sophisticated liberal who will appoint activist, left-wing judges to the courts. The Ninth Circuit Court ruled that saying "one na tion under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional. Imagine this anti-religious extremism spreading through the rest of the court system in a wave of Obama appointments.

John McCain can be expected to appoint judges who respect the vital role that religion has historically played in American public life.

Beyond the courts, Obama would strengthen and expand opportunities for trial lawyers to sue. McCain would focus on litigation reform to reduce the number of lawsuits.

In a bad economy, McCain would focus on economic growth and job creation. Obama has promised to focus on "spreading your wealth."

Watching the ACORN organization come under investigation in more than a dozen states for voter fraud and illegality, it is sobering to imagine what Obama, a former ACORN trainer and community organizer, would do to give even more of our tax money to this hard-left, corrupt organization. It is also unlikely an Obama Justice Department would prosecute any of the donor-fraud and voter-fraud allegations that are rapidly building up.

Far from protecting our liberty here at home, an Obama administration will join its union allies in stripping us of our right to a secret ballot when voting on whether to join a union, a right that protects us from being browbeaten and coerced by labor organizers who wish to unionize. John McCain can be counted on to protect that right.

Union dominance under Obama will make it much harder to pass school-choice legislation, enact merit pay for good teachers or dismiss bad teachers. The William Ayers connection is a useful warning about the left-wing education propaganda likely to spread through our schools to brainwash our children under an Obama administration.

The recent stories about Obama's friendship with apologists for terrorism are a reminder that we really do not know how radical an Obama administration would be. We do know he has promised to meet with every dictator and anti-American regime. McCain's record on these issues is far sounder.

Finally, on the vice presidency, it is revealing that no national network TV interviewer asked Gov. Sarah Palin about her experiences as governor; her experience writing an $11 billion state budget; her experience leading the 29,000 employees of the Alaskan state government; her experience negotiating a big deal with ExxonMobil, Shell, BP and the rest of Big Oil; her success in giving the money from that negotiation to the people of Alaska as a $1,300 tax cut for every man, woman and child in the state; or her experience in negotiating a natural-gas pipeline that is the biggest civil-construction project in North America, and which three former governors failed to get done.

Contrast the elite media's refusal to ask about Gov. Palin's genuine achievements with their equally clear refusal to pursue Sen. Joe Biden when he has been just plain wrong. The most comical example was Biden's claim that we could go with him to Katie's restaurant to learn about the problems of the middle class. Barely any attention was given to the fact that Katie's restaurant closed in 1986. No elite reporter asked whether Biden had not learned about the middle class since 1986 or whether he is simply out of touch with reality. Between Biden and Palin, I would take Palin any day.

For these reasons and more, the McCain-Palin ticket would lead to a much better future for America than Obama-Biden.

Newt Gingrich, speaker of the House from 1995 to 1999, is the author of "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less."